Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 2:11 am.
Part of Trans Information is getting your conscious mind out of the process. Of particular importance is getting your expectations out of the way. Even after all this, certain bits of information have a higher 'sureness factor' than others. I've compartmentalized the information based on how much I trust it to not be from me. The following tags will clarify this.
VISION (V) - For me, usually from dreams after doing mental exercises and queries before going to bed. Visions are nearly rock solid, but unfortunately suffer from the need to be interpreted. I have many dreams, but only a very few ever feel truly meaningful when I wake up.
HUNCH (H) - A very strong feeling that something is the way it is. For instance, I have a Hunch that not a single magnet device is capable of producing Free Energy unless it also utilises electricity. I could be wrong. It could just be that it's harder to produce Free Energy with Magnet Motors, but if any of yous makes one that really works I swear I'll eat a SMOT! Also Hunches are the type of information that I most often ascribe to 'Arantha'.
FEELING (F) - Like a Hunch but not as strong. More information than a sharp stick in the eye, but not by much.
COMMENT (C) - Usually my thoughts or comments about a Vision, Hunch, or Feeling. Particularly my thoughts on how something I've seen might function. Often used to point out differences between what I would have expected, and what my Vision, or Hunches have told me. In the past I have come to believe information from Visions that greatly differs from what I expect.
RESEARCH (R) - Often after a Vision I'll look for something similar on the web. I must have done a hundred searches for 'plate + x' after my 'Vision of the Brick' (see below). Also I sometimes combine Research with Hunches/Feelings to guide me towards useful data.
Free Energy (FE)/Free Energy Device (FED) - In my original notes (especially the Hunches) I described various processes as '(apparent) over unity' (see theory below). After a while this gets really annoying, so let me just define Free Energy as any process that seems to produce more energy than you put into it. By that definition an un-amplified crystal radio, a solar cell, a thermocouple, a windmill, a nuclear reactor, and a hydroelectric dam are all Free Energy Devices. I think this was to deflect the inevitable criticism of mainstream science. If you copy this and post it somewhere else you may consider replacing 'free energy' with '(apparent) over unity'.
ADDENDUM - Even though I really hate that term, it seems that my source really likes it. My source feels that the device is no different than a solar cell and that the whole concept of 'Free' Energy is very misleading. Ok whatever.
Graviton - A large part of my Hunches concern the nature of gravity (see theory below). One of my major hunches (very strong) is that Gravitons are everywhere and that they push mass not attract it. Almost every standard theory of gravity today postulates that Gravitons are emitted by mass and pull mass to them. When I use the term Graviton I mean "Omni Bountiful Omni Directional Push Gravitons".
This is a rough outline for the generation of Free Energy as detailed by Arantha. Much of the terminology used will be technically incorrect due to my lack of proper vocabulary. I leave it up to the reader to decipher what I'm describing.
This is not so much a blueprint as a sign post to get you going in the right direction. Those with sufficient intuition combined with (but not hampered by) a workable understanding of gravity, quantum mechanics, and electronics should (with a little trial and error) be able to use these instructions to construct an (apparent) over unity device.
The name of the device, which is as basic as an electric motor in civilizations throughout the universe, is purposely omitted. Naming the device (generator, collector, converter, translator, concentrator) often implies a method of it's functioning, which will necessarily change as the understanding of physical laws changes.
Two conducting plates are fixed parallel to each other.
A positive voltage is applied to both plates and released (F). Upon release a 'feedback' charge is produced. When constructed and calibrated correctly the feedback charge will be greater than the energy expended for the initiation charge, by a small but measurable amount.
(The exact way the plates are charged is still somewhat unclear to me, and subsequent visions have only clouded not clarified this. They may be charged like a common capacitor but they may be charged in some other way. I'm not even sure if one can apply voltage to 'both' plates of a capacitor at the same time. I should note that when I 'saw' this I didn't even know that two parallel plates was a capacitor (C/R).)
The magnitude of the feedback charge is based on:
The surface area of the plates (more = more)
The distance they are separated (less = more)
The material between the plates (lighter/vacuum = more)
The waveform of the applied voltage. (square > sinusoidal)
Only a certain initiation charge is necessary to cause the feedback charge. Any power over this threshold level is wasted (F). The charge voltage should pulse as short as possible. Any duration over a certain (very short) time is wasted. With the materials in use now, it is virtually impossible to make the pulse too short. Making the pulse too long is the main cause of the process NOT achieving over unity (H).
This charge pulse/feedback charge cycle can be repeated as many times as possible with no discernable regeneration time. It is only limited by the response time of the components used. This is mainly because using current technology the machine barely taps a tiny percentage of the theoretical maximum (H).
After initiation by an external power source, the device will run indefinitely if it uses its own feedback charge to generate its charge pulse. Common first designs use a rechargeable battery to initiate the process, which then leeches off a small amount of the (apparent) over unity energy to replenish it's charge for the next start. Civilizations that make this discovery early often use a crank and a large capacitor. Earth is NOT one of those 'early risers'. This design may be better for remote and undeveloped areas because the components (the rechargeable battery) will not wear out as quickly (H).
I saw a vision of a simple device last night. It was slick and sleek like something one would buy at the Sharper Image.
It consisted of metal plates with rounded corners about 5" x 8" and stacked together in a cube about 4" high. Each plate was offset from the next plate by discs of black material. The discs were about ½" diameter, ½" high, and about ½" from the (rounded) corners of the plates. The discs on the top and bottom were rounded to make knobs that would keep the 'brick' off of any flat surface on which it was sitting. The plates themselves were about 2mm thick and coated with shiny golden metal (V).
As is the case with visions, I could 'sense' things that would not be apparent just from seeing them. The plates were a hard metal (to me zinc and copper are soft metals (C)), and the coating was electroplated and polished. The discs were something like hard dry rubber. They reminded me of carbon fibre washers that are sometimes used in barbeques. It had a certain 'tightness' (well made) to it. Either it had bolts through the washers/plates, or was made with epoxy and pressure (V). The source of the 'tightness' I couldn't see (C).
On the short (5") end each plate had a small tab in the centre connected to it's own wire, the wire was much thicker than that used for a 9 volt battery, but slightly smaller than one side of that used for a house lamp. The wire was well insulated, perhaps even a bit thicker than would be normal for that gauge. A few inches from the 'brick' the wires were collected in a black corrugated sleeve like cable management tubes used in computer installations. The sleeve ran off to some 'black box' which was not the focus of this vision (V)
This will be a commercial device (VVV). Perhaps a novelty, but functioning nonetheless. It didn't feel like this thing could power a house, but more like a small radio or a nightlight (H). Would you pay $200 at the Sharper Image for a shiny gold brick that can power a small emergency radio and/or an LED flashlight FOREVER with NO BATTEREIS?
Besides, if you're going to look into the future you might as well look at the $200 one instead of the ugly grey $40 one (that works just as good) from Sears (C).
After a few days my only feeling of the black box (for THIS device) is that it's small and simple, being about ¾" x 1 ½" x 2 ½". (I expected it to be big like a car battery charger (C).) It may have had another (simpler) cord leaving from the opposite side that the charge plate wires entered(H).
Since this will be a commercial device (VVV), it will comply with product laws common in industrialized countries (C). Things like Underwriters Laboratories approval, product liability assessments, and FCC radio interference laws would all be the same for this device as for every TV, Computer, Electric Motor, Transformer etcetera (C deduction)
Because of this certain things can be deduced from this information, namely:
It functions in air (V).It doesn't produce arcs, or ozone.
Anyone can touch it while it's operating, even a child. It must not be capable of shocking or hurting anyone. Either the total power is very low or touching the plates causes them to not work (naturally or by safety circuitry). Possibly, (or not) the power is actually collected in the 'black box' and not dangerous until it is collected (C).
The device has no RF shielding. It does not interfere with (nor is it susceptible to) any current (or future) RF products, nor does it hinder pacemakers (no warning sticker) (H).
I was really taken aback by how different this vision was from what I expected (or interpolated) from the first 'Hunch'. For instance I expected the plates to be barely a few mm apart (C), not a huge 10-15mm (V). I also expected the plates to be hooked up every other one to a wire. This would have saved a lot of production costs (C). I can only deduce that the individual wires are vitally necessary in this 'multi plate' configuration (H). Even though I still feel that the effect can be produced in just two plates (H), perhaps complicated pulsing, switching, collecting, and grounding (from the 'black box') dramatically increases the efficiency (C). Since even now I'm still not sure how the charge pulse/feedback charge works it's hard for me to even speculate.
I have no idea what the gold (brass?) plating was for. It might prevent corrosion, but then again it might be for no other reason than marketing. (Remember suckers are going to pay 200$ for this at Sharper Image, it might really even be gold (C).)
One thing that occurred to me is that perhaps this device was purposely made to be low power (remember it's a novelty) (C). Perhaps close plates are more efficient but require a higher charge voltage. Such a device might be a thousand times more efficient and produce a kilowatt or more, but create hazardous amounts of voltage for exposed plates, significant RF noise, and ozone producing ionization. It may not even work outside of a vacuum (C).
I still haven't had any clear visions of the box. I did have one weird and convoluted vision of the charge going into the wires however.
Anyway in my dream I was looking at a grid near the block. Each cube of space had three values: electrical, magnetic, and virtual. Electrical and Magnetic were easy to compute and could be -1,0,1. Virtual was weird, in that it's value was always a letter and not an explicit value, like the imaginary number 'i'. Certain configurations of space blocks with E and M values aligned correctly would yield various multiples of v, like 2v, 3v etcetera Somehow this jumble was the key to the functioning of the device (F- Even though this vision was clear, I feel that I have utterly failed to interpret it correctly, thus it gets an F not a V)
Most of my attempts to get information about the black box have instead led me to hunches and visions of the 'Charge Pulse'. It is significantly more complicated than from the first 'hunch', and subsequent visions have all led me to believe that the 'Charge Pulse' is the major factor in the functioning of the device (H). I didn't realize how much of this material was devoted to the pulse. I don't even remember writing some of this down (C). It might be a little 'messy' because it was compiled from about 8 different Visions, Hunches, and Feelings.
Certain properties of 'The Pulse' seem to be fairly constant across visions. These are:
The pulse is 0 to positive (H). NOTE: I recently learned that in conventional electricity 'current' (electron holes) flows from positive to ground, while the actual electrons flow from ground to positive, so I might have this exactly opposite (or it may not matter) (C). What matters is that an alternating current WILL NOT WORK (H).
The pulse is incredibly short, in the order of micro seconds, perhaps even nano or pico seconds.
The pulse has a very very very fast rise time and it's basic form is a square wave.
The zero time is longer than the pulse time by at least a factor of 3 probably more (F). From 'feeling' the device work it's more around 5-30 pulses per second (H).
The pulse is high voltage, although amperage can be very low (H). Whether it's 500 or 5,000 or 50,000 volts I don't know. It may depend on the size (and spacing) of the plates (C).
I'm starting to get the feeling that the pulse is responsible for 90% of the phenomenon in the device. Whether the 'collector' is plates, coils, spark gaps, or just the wires themselves, it seems the pulse is the critical factor (H). (I still think that my plates vision is the most efficient, but with over unity anything over 100% is 'good enough' (F/C). ) Having the pulse be high voltage (current seems unimportant), positive square, and as short as possible seems to have more effect than almost any configuration of 'collector' (H).
I had a vision of the pulse (more like a 'mind taste' or maybe a dream). If you could hear it, it would sound like a 'tic'. Like a little miniature (super fast) lightning bolt. In the vision I could feel something about space/time itself wrench with the pulse, and the feeling would go right through my dream body. It was NOT a frequency, but rather just a few tics per second (H).
From what I can tell controlling the duration of the pulse is the main 'inefficiency point' in most of these machines. Making the pulse as short as possible, should be a primary goal. With current technology, it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to make the pulse too short. Most solid state devices use a charged capacitor to build the high voltages necessary for the pulse, but conversely discharging the whole capacitor (no matter how small) makes the pulse too long and wastes energy (H).
I've had hunches and twinges but no stark visions or images lately. I did have another fuzzy dream of the pulse. The voltage has to be high in order to 'slam' something. The image I had was of a metal rod slamming into a metal block at incredible speed. The weight of the rod is not so important as it's speed. (Note that this was a metaphorical vision, with the rod being fast rise time, high voltage). After the piston hits the slab (and is removed just as quickly), the slab is momentarily altered. The atoms become 'primed' (in the vision they were 'confused' and 'disoriented'), and in that 'primed' state they perform some process for a very short time. Something enters them or leaves them, with the net result (possibly after several transitions) is that extra energy is imparted to the electrons of the atoms as a potential (V).
Even though I think the 'rod smashed into block' is metaphorical, on second thought it might NOT be so abstract. I was thinking of something similar to the piezoelectric effect that can be produced in almost any solid material violently shocked. Even though I know the 'rod smashed into block' can not be used to produce (apparent) over unity, the effects MAY be similar (F).
__ _________ __ _________
|\ | |\ | | | | |
| \| | \ | | | | |
| \ | \ | | | | |
| |\ | \ | | | | |
| | \ | \ | | | | |
| | \ | \ | | | | |
| | \ | \ | | | | |
| | \ | \ | | | | |
| | \ | \| or | | | | time--->
A B | A / | B /
| / | /
| / | /
| / | /
| / | /
| / | /
| / | /
| / | /
SQUARE: Charge Pulse
DIAGONAL: Feedback Charge
A : (ultra short square pulse, over unity)
energy expended : 36.0 units
energy feedback : 45.0 units
net energy : + 9.0 (125% efficiency)
B : (long square pulse, NOT over unity)
energy expended : 99.0 units
energy feedback : 45.0 units
net energy : -54.0 (45% efficiency)
This is just a mental picture of the Charge Pulse/Feedback Charge. I think that attempting to 'recycle' the Charge Pulse ruins it's efficacy. Also the Feedback Charge graph is more like 1/t.
I have been striving to get a better view of the 'black box' and the way it operates. Also, I've been researching other (alleged) free energy devices. So far the only machines that seem to make sense to me are those that use ultra short, positive high voltage pulses. There are other devices that work in other ways, but they just don't seem 'right' (H). So far there are three that use this type of pulse. They are from Edwin Gray, Tom Bearden, and Floyd Sweet respectively.
Tom Bearden's idea about 'preserving potential' makes my intuition ring full on false (H). (Note: A guy talking to his imaginary friend isn't really in a strong debating position to criticise other peoples theories (C).) There is one thing he said that sounds right he postulates that certain materials would work better (in his system) than others. Namely he ties the functioning of his device to the 'relaxation time' of the conductor. (According to him the relaxation time is inversely related to how long an electron can travel in a conductor without hitting an atom. Thus good conductors have very low relaxation times and don't work very well.) He points out that copper has a virtually zero relaxation time, while other less conductive materials (semiconductors) have (relatively) long relaxation times. His device uses aluminium doped with iron (R/H). Edwin Gray's 'collector' has a spark gap inside a copper cylinder sleeve, but included inside that cylinder is a block of carbon (in series) with the spark gap as a resister, another long relaxation time material (R/H). I get a strong feeling that the material of the plates in my device is a hard coarse grey metal (the cheap 'Sears' version (F)).
| Edwin Gray's 'Collector'
| -----------------> (Extra Collected Energy)
| perforated copper tube