Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter


User talk:SilverThunder/Archive/2007/January

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 2:00 am.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

<pesn type=


I am editing PESWiki:Verifiability.

I would like you to maybe review it. It need more work, but it is an evolving page.

Reddi 15:53, 1 Jan 2007 (EST)

Have a look @ these

If you can, have a look @ these ...

PESWiki:Citing evidence


PESWiki:Point of view

PESWiki:Original research

... and give me some feedback. Reddi 19:04, 1 Jan 2007 (EST)

[from my talk]

The policy pages are only rough drafts .... i thought too that they would be good addition to the site. I will try to loosen the requirements. I canged the verifiable sources thing, with a focus on original source material. I hope the stance the article has now is better ... a stance toward something that is more conducive to the "bleeding edge" material ...

I am not sure if there is a way to not link the policy pages prominently in the support material before you have an opportunity to review them. I can put a pending tag @ the top of the page though ... will do that asap

Reddi 11:20, 2 Jan 2007 (EST)

[from my talk]

I'll do this ...

{| align="center" style=" border: 1px solid #fcc background-color: #fee text-align: center font-size: 100% width:100%"


|style="text-align: center"|

Image:Nuvola apps important-50px.png

The following page is under consideration.


| style="text-align: center"|

This page is in the process of being modified to meet PESWiki standards. It is being discussed and modified, with pertinent issues being considered. This temporary statement will be removed once the necessary adjustments have been made.


... Reddi

What do you think? Reddi 12:23, 2 Jan 2007 (EST)


No worries about the changes, they are for the best. I was just trying to add some stuff from the hopper, but I really didn't have any experience doing so. I will learn as time passes in the future I will try and better emulate how other news is posted. Nseidm1 21:53, 2 Jan 2007 (EST)

That is a rather snazzy "under construction" image above. Nseidm1 21:54, 2 Jan 2007 (EST)

Your welcome

Thank you for your warm welcome. I will be glad to contribute in whatever I am able I'll study the guidelines you mentioned with care. Regards. --Utad3 06:27, 3 Jan 2007 (EST)P.S.:My English level sometimes is not formal enough to edit good articles, so you're welcome to correct my sentences whenever you think it is appropriate. :)

:Btw, may you help me with the following request?: the special page "Book sources", in order to search the books with the ISBN number, contains but not is it possible to add the last one to this special page? I am requesting this link because of the new article on the recent book Creation: The Physical Truth, which is available at all Amazon sites (.ca, .fr, .de, .jp, .uk) but not at .com (donnot know why). Thanks. --Utad3 06:50, 3 Jan 2007 (EST)

<pesn type=


PESWiki:Book sources done. Reddi 00:10, 4 Jan 2007 (EST)

top 100

Hydrogen-Boost is #51 on the top 100 list. #51 should also reference other companies using the same concept. At least Eagle Research, and a few other companies that specifically mention the requirement of varying the air/fuel mixture after enhancement. Nseidm1 20:38, 4 Jan 2007 (EST)

Nature's wheelwork

Just a set of community pages ... centralize discussions .. and keep them seperated ... Reddi 22:40, 5 Jan 2007 (EST)

ala .... Welcome to Nature's wheelwork newcomers and oldtimers! This is where PESWikins raise and try to answer PESWiki-related questions and concerns regarding technical issues, policies, and operation in our community.

Reddi 22:44, 5 Jan 2007 (EST)

Something Despised

I really desipse those HydroStar ads appearing on google. They are extraordinarily misleading, and a blatent attempt to capitalize on the gullibility of the general public. I would like to recommend removing it from the main page. It is obviously your discression, but the ad personally urks me. Although the sub page defines the situation well, having it on the homepage is kinda perpetuating the manipulation inadvertently.

Some Other Thoughts

Recently I have become quite savvy with html coding. It would be a pleasure to have a crack at the homepage. I can download the html code from Internet Explorer as all html code is easily retreivable. I will send it to you once I have something substantial. Obviously your discression and opinion is of the utmost importance.

: I actually just sent an email about the html stuff. In addition a link to the html is below. As I recommended in the email, load the version below, and the actual homepage and flip back and forth to see the difference.

Free Energy News

Articles related to Aspden

Dear admin SilverThunder, please give a look into this user recent contribs Utad3 16:41, 7 Jan 2007 (EST)


It was not and it is not my intention to edit here on the Spirituality subject (not in PowerPedia which is oriented to Science and advanced scientific research), as I have already provided the tiny amounts that I am acquainted with in a multitude of related articles for the past two and such years :-) being aware that those editions changed-opened forever the perception of many individuals worldwide.

That is why I am not able to understand where you saw an inclination to spirituality in my previous editions here :) It may have been in the reference "worlds", "material world" and "etheric [world]" in both articles (?) however, I have studied, still not deeply enough I know, both fields and they just describe exactly the same "object".

Now, I took part in the past in the edition about the Russian astronomer/astrophysicist "Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev" and I sense that his almost unknown huge work has also amounts of useful and pioneer data to give to to science (i.e. in physics and cosmology fields) and has already influenced other current researchers in these "frontiers" of knowledge (related to the aether, tensor fields, causal mechanics and theory of time, etc.). As soon I have some spare time, I would like to edit a more brief an article on him, is it ok? --Utad3 18:46, 7 Jan 2007 (EST)