Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter



Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:34 am.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Discussion page for PowerPedia:Quasiturbine


<pesn type=

Member Remarks"></pesn>

On Oct. 3, 2005, NEC member, Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen wrote:

[This] engine is conventional, though novel. Don't expect high efficiency.

Losses in Crankshaft

On Oct. 5, 2005, former NEC member, Douglas Mann wrote:

ANY engine that has a standard crankshaft rod type system by

design will have very poor efficiency. The percent of force that the

effective cylinder applies to the piston that can be converted to

toqure is less than 20% max point with an over all mean of less than

7%. This factor is why standard engine designs have not been able to

improve. Rotory design offer some improvment with other problems but

even then most design convert less than 25% of the applied force to

the load. Turbo engines can convert 50% of applyed force but the open

combustion is the problem there.

My engine called the Dmannd Engine has a mean conversion rate of

over 90%. It is a very advanced form of the Bourke engine design.

Being a two cylinder op engine with yoke drive crank system.

On Oct. 7, 2005, NEC member, Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen responded to Douglas Mann:

: Nonsense. Engines have been tested by the thousands that achieve 30% absolute efficiency. This is far above your 7 and 20% mechanical transfer figures.

Other Comments

post here

(Just click on the "There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1].)