Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:34 am.
The US Constitution And The War Against It by Congress:Member:Leslie R. Pastor Copyright © 2009
The Sheriff is the only duly authorized police authority allowed by the US Constitution and most State Constitutions, and the control paradigm knows it. They are just now challenging their authority because they do not want the people of the United States to have such authority via their duly elected and authorized representative. They are doing this because of their desire to fast-track the New World Order: Sheriffs Bush-Whacked ~ America's Free Press
Political Sermons from Pastors in the Founding Era - Part 1 News With Views - Roger Anghis - July 21, 2013
Political Sermons from Pastors in the Founding Era - Part 2 News With Views - Roger Anghis - August 4, 2013
Political Sermons from Pastors in the Founding Era - Part 3 News With Views - Roger Anghis - August 11, 2013
'Judge Andrew Napolitano On The US Constitution and Freedom (Part 1 through 6)'
2V016SOXKMY Ah_dW-l5Trw LW9XuBtCsRU fGB1qa-S_7I B_eobl0zbuE k6v91BwD39A SUgECnR21-I W6JxrvIOZIM
Harvard University Professor Speaks Out Against The US Constitution http://www.meetup.com/Campaign-for-Liberty-suffolk-county-long-island-chapter/boards/view/viewthread?thread=9838434
The Constitution of The United States
Most US American Citizens, in general, living upon the soil of the United States of America, are ignorant of their own country, its political traditions, philosophy, theory, documents and (again) in general, the significant history that transpired in and upon their shores. They have ignored their ‘birthright’ to their detriment and to their peril. Their ignorance will probably lead to their demise, as a ‘free country,’ if they refuse to awaken from their self induced apnea and mental lethargy.
Essentially, there does exist, a significant duality regarding the American Political Tradition. There is a secret part, and there is an open historical framework, that is acknowledged and is readily available within the archives of our major Universities and their associated libraries. Documentation, thankfully, does exist for both the secret and the historical framework of our nation’s history, enabling/providing myself the opportunity, to both access and present this information within the proper perspective, essential to my research format, and framework.
Many Christians believe that the United States is a "Christian" country, founded upon "Christian" principles, and structured according to Biblical teachings. Such thinking, presented by significant individuals, is not without proper foundation. For indeed many of our Founders were openly "Christian," who aspired their traditions, and were guided by their beliefs. They collaborated co-jointly with those who wanted a complete separation from the Crown, willingly cooperating to that end.
One particular "Christian" political philosopher, Francis A Schaeffer, articulated this Lex Rex. The "law is king" became the rallying point, as opposed to Rex Lex (the king is law). According to Dr. Schaeffer, our political traditions incorporated political philosophers, who acquired their philosophy from "Christian beliefs and Christian traditions." Those of you who remember their French history, specifically Louis the XIV, remember his famous statement, "C’est l’etate C’est moi" essentially, espousing his monarchy, as a political ‘divine right,’ reflecting existing European tradition. Dr. Schaeffer postulated that Freedom necessitated safeguards or controls, if you will, which the Founding Fathers, of necessity incorporated within their political documents.
'The Revolutionary Age -- The Christian Manifesto vs The Humanist Manifesto
The "Duality" regarding the "Christian Manifesto" and the "Humanist Manifesto" has become the defining delineation between two ‘primary’ worldviews that have been in diametric juxtapositions since the beginning of time itself. Supremacy has been held by the one, while the antithesis of the equation has remained the primary thesis of western culture and civilization. The Renaissance and the Reformation have remained the embodiment of that conflict, which continues to our present day, albeit, as mere thought forms expressed by individuals who carry such concepts within their personal particular meditative milieu.
For my purposes, I will digress and simplify the subject-matter, pertaining to our political tradition, and stress, merely the essential fundamentals sustaining my arguments in support of the US Constitution and its significant political statements addressing our inherent ‘common law’ rights as citizens of the United States.
The people (citizens) born within the United States are the true and rightful sovereigns of their own country, because they alone are the inherent holders of the political power. Their power as sovereigns is derived from their common law rights, their political principles, which are recognized as being inalienable and attested to by their political trust deeds. Their common law rights are antecedent to the ratification of their state and federal constitutions, and being so fundamental, can neither be derogated nor abrogated. They have styled their government as a ‘republic,’ deriving their just ‘powers’ from the consent of those that they govern in essence, and in fact. Thus the people govern themselves, according to their political doctrines, based on the political theories of those that they emulate, as lawful authority.
The Founding Fathers framed their political philosophy from the writings of the early political philosophers, such as John Locke, Montesquieu, David Hume and Thomas Hobbes. They selected those elements of political theory as best suited for their convictions.
Founding Fathers political philosophy, Federalist Papers & Political Theory
All were learned men, many educated in England and were familiar with English political tradition, grounded in the classics, being familiar with both the negative and positive elements of political theory.
The Declaration of Independence is probably the most important political document pertaining to the founding of the United States. For it stated the very principles upon which the founders and framers intended to ’establish and ordain’ their course of action, and thus ultimately frame their newly formed government. They were breaking from their allegiance to the King of England and thus were severing their relationship with the most powerful empire existing in their timeframe. Their actions would be irrevocable and would cost them dearly, many of whom were to pay with their very lives and with their fortunes. They knew what course of action they were taking, and were determined to either establish liberty or experience death in sacred honor. The choice was clear, there was no turning back, and they stated so in their Declaration.
Declaration of Independence:
The Signers of the Declaration of Independence
In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the intent of the Founding Fathers, it will be necessary for the reader to view the actual documents, (their political trust deeds, political theory, and their significant correspondence amongst each other). Thus the following research is required reading:
The American Constitution - A Documentary Record
Constitution of New York State (1777)
The Articles of Confederation
Eighteenth Century Documents (1700-1799)
These documents were known as organic documents being based upon historical reference:
Lex Rex (by Samuel Rutherford)
A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) John Locke
Two Treatises of Government (1680-1690) John Locke
Spirit of the Laws - Separation of Powers (1751) Montesquieu
Those that truly understand these fundamental doctrines and political documents, will find themselves to be good lawyers, able to counter any and all disparagement regarding their ‘established and ordained’ political trust deeds, which can neither be derogated nor abrogated because they are so fundamentally derived from their ‘common law’ rights of immemorial antiquity. The Founding Fathers styled their ‘government’ by making the ‘people’ the ‘inherent holders of the political power,’ thus acknowledging the ‘people’ as the true ‘sovereigns’ and thus their true ‘government.’ LEX REX became the embodiment of their will. They emphasized the LAW and not the KING. They relied upon the equality of sovereignty among themselves as the inherent holders of the political power. They expected the ‘people’ to enforce the ‘laws,’ thereby safeguarding their ‘common law’ rights. And they ‘established and ordained’ their political ‘trust deeds’ known as their state and federal constitutions, to forever be their ‘law of the land’ within each of their individual States and Federal government.
The Founding Fathers in this manner established a ‘republic’ and a ‘republican’ form of government, providing their ‘people’ true ‘freedom’ and true ‘sovereignty’ as citizens styled as 'the inherent holders of the political power.' There is no other form of government in the entire world like the United States of America. We are one of a kind, probably never to be introduced again, until KINGDOM COME, HIS WILL BE DONE.
Those that can effectively argue the above political doctrines, theory and law facts, can thus effectively demonstrate that they are not subject to most of the legislation that has been created outside of the 'law of the land.' With the proper knowledge of law, they might even be able to prove the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction regarding most of the statutes, that have been promulgated and styled as mere presumptions of law.
Currently there are two factions who are attempting to call for a Constitutional Convention as per the dictates of our Founding Fathers as written within our political trust deeds, political documents and taken directly from the political theories of our original Founding Fathers. These factions are determined to make their government stronger in their eyes, and to make it more responsive to their constituents. The problem inherent with their intent, is that they might inadvertently forever ‘alter’ the intent of the original Founders, thereby weakening their freedoms, and forever ending their original ‘sovereignty.’
Common Sense by Thomas Paine
Common Sense II
The American Common Law (Dale Pond)
NO TREASON -- Lysander Spooner
Bankrupted States = Constitutional Convention & New States Constitution
The Battle to Stop the Constitutional Convention
Bob Schulz's Statement to the IRS:Pertaining to the US Constitution, Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights
'''Bob Schulz: 1040 Check Mate:
DOJ Dismisses Felony Tax Prosecution - With Prejudice -- After PRA Defense Raised
Bob Schulz: Constitutional Convention 2009
"Where is it written in the Constitution, in what article or section is it contained, that you may take children from their parents and parents from their children, and compel them to fight the battles of any war in which the folly and wickedness of the government may engage itself? Under what concealment has this power lain hidden, which now for the first time comes forth, with a tremendous and baleful aspect, to trample down and destroy the dearest right of personal liberty? Who will show me any Constitutional injunction which makes it the duty of the American people to surrender everything valuable in life, and even life, itself, whenever the purposes of an ambitious and mischievous government may require it? ... A free government with an uncontrolled power of military conscription is the most ridiculous and abominable contradiction and nonsense that ever entered into the heads of men." -- Daniel Webster (1782--1852), US Senator Source: Speech in the House of Representatives, January 14, 1814
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Civil Rights
Brady Campaign’s purported "common sense gun laws," remove the civil rights of law abiding people, but nowhere in the gun control formula is there any curtailment of the "right" of violent predators to inflict pain, suffering, or death upon others........
The Second Amendment Foundation
Blogs -- Forum Discussions [ 9th & 10th Amendments ]
Replacing "Controlled" Newspapers ... WITH REAL ONES! by Devvy Kidd
US~Observer Headlines -- (Archived) (Devvy Kidd)
America: Republic or Democracy? - The Difference That it Makes
by Dr. Herbert W. Titus
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
State of New Hampshire -- HR6 (States Rights Based On Jeffersonian Principles) -- 2009
HB 09-1206, The Colorado Honest Money Act -- (Gold & Silver Coinage)
Indiana Follows In The Footsteps of Colorado (Gold & Silver Coinage)
That the State of Washington hereby claims sovereignty under HJM 4009 p.2 the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States and
(2) That this serve as a Notice and Demand to the federal government to maintain the balance of powers where the Constitution of the United States established it and to cease and desist, effective immediately, any and all mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that we, the members of the House of Representatives of the Ninety-fifth General Assembly, hereby declare our sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States
Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the State of Arizona, the Senate concurring, that:
1. That the State of Arizona hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.
NINE STATES NOW DECLARING SOVEREIGNTY!!
10th Amendment Resolution - TLP
That the State of Colorado hereby claims sovereignty, under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, over all powers not otherwise ...
www.lawfulpath.com/ref/10th-mnd.shtml - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
Several states have recently appealed to the 10th and/or the 9th Amendments to assert their state rights over federal government. These amendments state:
Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
There are significant safeguards that the Founding Fathers placed within the US Constitution: THE LAW IS CLEAR, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS IN BREACH OF CONTRACT:
[Article 9 of the Bill of Rights]
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
[Article 10 of the Bill of Rights]
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
[Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution]
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
I don't believe that it gets much more concise than that.
Voluntary Servitude By Deception
Progressive Democratic View of the US Constitution
Democrat-Socialist Jerrold Nadler's View On The US Constitution http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2011/01/06/jerrold-nadler-gets-both-the-constitution-and-torah-wrong-in-the-same-interview/
“Ritualistic reading” as if it is a “sacred text”…..”a highly imperfect text” Socialist Nadler insists.
'Article was found at Cristy Li.'
“Democrat-Socialist Jerrold Nadler having only today taken his Oath of Office as required pursuant to the 6th Article of the Constitution of the United States now criticizes the Republican Majority for their plans to open up Thursday’s Session of Congress with the reading of the Constitution.
WaPo “For more than 200 years, Americans have revered the Constitution of the United States as the law of the land…”
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY complained that Republicans plans to read the Constitution on the House Floor Thursday will be “…reading it as a sacred text,” arguing that the “ritualistic reading…total nonsense and propaganda…You read the Torah, you read the Bible, you build a worship service around it,” said Nadler adding, that the Founders were not “demigods” and that the documents need for amendments to abolish slavery and other injustices showed it was “highly imperfect.”
Nadler's comments show the main problem with Progressive (Democrat-Socialists) Philosophy. One does not simply read the Torah like its a good novel or the morning paper—the Torah is studied because it is meant to be a Blueprint for how to live your life.
Similarly the U.S. Constitution is a Blueprint for good government to follow and the fact that it may be amended is the beauty of its perfection.
If nothing else, Nadler’s comments evidence Democrat-Socialists disdain for our Founding Documents and how obsolete and irrelevant Loony Liberal Lefties believe them to be.
More here Nadler Gets Both Constitution & Torah Wrong –Yid With Lid”
Comment: Mr. Nadler is a leading Socialist in the Democrat Party. He has been in the House of Representatives almost 20 years."
The Washington Post: To Form A More Perfect Union http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/06/AR2011010606631.html?wprss=rss_print
- Congress:Member:Leslie R. Pastor - index of articles