Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:55 am.
Richard Philip Feynman the brilliant theoretical physicist, intimately associated with Einstein, Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project, who received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965, stated: "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is."
The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. I, page 4-2. Addison-Wesley ©1963.
Source Document Link: http://www.peaceone.net/basic/Feynman/V1%20Ch01.pdf
Source Reference Link: http://www.peaceone.net/basic/Feynman/V1%20Ch04.pdf
The "Educated-Idiots" tell us repeatedly, "It’s Impossible!" "It’s Impossible!" It violates the "Laws" of thermodynamics, motion, and the most holy of holies, the "Scientific Method" principles of 'discovery.' Hog Wash! The "Laws" are only ‘models’ Gödel until they are eventually ‘disproved’ or updated or falsified by newer more accurate models or discoveries. The real problem is the ‘control’ paradigm already in-place preventing the fruition of those ‘newer’ discoveries, already discovered by known ‘novelty of fact’ researchers, who have already defined better models and references. The real and more accurate question to be asked is why the continuous curtailment of newer ‘discovery’ and the prevention of more modern and more abundant forms of energy transformation.
A mere cursory observation of the life of Nikola Tesla,
The Destruction of Tesla's Laboratories
will prove my point and will more accurately demonstrate how ‘novelty of fact’ discovery is continuously being deliberately overturned, when and only when, such discovery involves the free use of free energy, derived from free sources, freely arrived at, without the intervention of third parties, investors, and the banking infrastructure. The ‘control’ paradigm continuously, habitually, structures itself around any system that is a ‘free’ source or flow of ‘energy,’ notwithstanding, whether it is ‘discovered’ ‘created’ or ‘manipulated’ from any and all ‘derived’ sources of earth, wind, solar or space.
As any ‘educated-idiot,’ presumably, already knows, ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed.’ Really? Does anyone really understand that statement? Has anyone really studied that statement? Think about it, ENERGY can NEITHER be CREATED nor DESTROYED. WOW!!!! ENERGY just IS!!!!!! It can merely be tapped, transformed and then converted to perform useful, productive WORK. ENERGY does not dissipate…..it just IS. [Is it sinking in yet?]
To be quite frank, the Educated-Idiots don’t even know what ‘Energy’ is. No one does. It just is. It cannot be accurately defined, referenced or explained, because energy is an enigma, that has been ‘structured’ to fit a variety of ‘protocols’ within our ‘science’ community. Thus the pontification of our ‘science’ community regarding ‘novelty of fact’ discovery, stating that such ‘discovery’ is ‘impossible’ is suspect, and probably borders on ‘dogmatic’ rigid ‘knee-jerk’ reaction (and thus the ‘structured’ thinking) of the past.
It is time to move forward, it is time to advance, away from the past, we need to arrive ‘back to the future’ and rediscover ‘Energy’ as it IS.
We know ‘energy’ basically as ‘electricity,’ for that is what we supposedly ‘generate’ with our current system of power generation. But ‘electricity’ is an indefinable term, and cannot be accurately distinguished. So what is 'electricity?': http://amasci.com/miscon/whatis.html All we know is that it just ‘works,’ literally! However we can also know ‘energy’ as ‘magnetism’ or ‘force,’ and it (energy) can even be extracted from ‘space-time’ and converted/changed into useful ‘work.’ The problem is, as I see it, is that all of our referenced sources of information are compartmentalized and locked up within our varying corporations, governmental institutions, and even within our structured educational system, with their own departments and schools of professionalism. When has an electrical engineering student ever walked across the hall to a physics class, and just listened in?
Before Nikola Tesla became the greatest ‘electrical engineer’ that ever lived, (he created our AC electrical paradigm mode by which we live and breathe today, he also created the ‘logic gates’ by which we communicate with our computers) he first studied physics (Faraday and Maxwell) and only when he clearly understood the proper ‘principles’ did he cross over into electrical engineering.
John Ambrose Fleming, a student of James Clerk Maxwell, who studied directly with him, attending classes (sometimes as the only student in the class) given by Maxwell, received his doctorate (under Maxwell’s influence) and went on to enable the creation of much of our modern technologies, including television invented by Philo T. Farnsworth.
There is a New Physics Paradigm which has already been both established and obfuscated at the same time. Primarily because certain powers controlling the content of information have significantly curtailed access via the normal channels of learning and data collection. The internet however has become the primary source stratum for such data and knowledge.
Eugene Mallove: "What is the Second Law of Thermodynamics?" There are many ways of stating the Second Law of Thermodynamics—there are many textbook definitions associated with different scientists. But it's essential conclusion is that a heat engine (an engine that uses heat and operates in a cycle) cannot convert 100% of the heat produced within it (from, say, fuel combustion) to an equivalent amount of useful work. Nature has supposedly saddled us with an efficiency limitation that cannot be broken. [Quoted from "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About New Energy Science and Technology," Infinite Energy magazine. Believed written by the late Dr. Eugene Mallove.]. Our comment is that first the heat engine must depart from equilibrium (the state of equilibrium), to be "potentialized" or "excited" or "activated" and thus to possess additional organized energy which then can be dissipated (changed in form) to produce work and entropy as the system changes entropically back toward the state of equilibrium. This initial energizing or exciting operation of the system, necessary to move it away from equilibrium, decreases the entropy of the system and is a negative entropy operation a priori. Hence the present old second "half-law" of thermodynamics is an oxymoron implicitly assuming that (1) its own contradiction has first occurred, and (2) that such a contradiction (such a negative entropy operation) does not again occur until the system has decayed back to equilibrium (maximum entropy state).
Steinmetz, Charles P. "The second law of thermodynamics is well founded on our experience. The reasoning from this law as to the death of the universe is logical. At the same time, the conclusion that the universe must run down is not reasonable. If the universe is eternal, has existed since infinite time, then it should have run down an infinite time ago. But if it is not eternal, but had a beginning, what was before? How could energy begin without offending the first law, that of the conservation of energy? Thus, in the final reasoning, we arrive at a contradiction." [Charles P. Steinmetz, "The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the 'Death' of Energy, with Notes on the Thermodynamics of the 'atmosphere'," General Electric Review, Vol. 15, July 1912.]
Energy vs Work
Semiz, Ibrahim, "Black hole as the ultimate energy source," American Journal of Physics, 63(2), Feb. 1995, p. 151-156. Quoting from p. 151: "The very expression 'energy source' is actually a misnomer. As is known since the early days of thermodynamics, and formulated as the first law, energy is conserved in any physical process. Since energy cannot be created or destroyed, nothing can be an energy source, or sink. Devices we call energy sources do not create energy, they convert it from a form not suitable for our needs to a form that is suitable, a form we can do work with."
Greer, Steven M., MD. "Strategies for Creating a New World with New Energy," in Flyer, 2007 Extraordinary Technology Conference, April 2007 (Conference scheduled for July 26-29 in Salt Lake City, Utah).
Quoting, p. 13: "…the strategic barriers to the widespread adoption of new electromagnetic energy-generating systems far exceed the technological ones. The proof of this is that after decades of innovative and promising inventions, none have made it through the maze of regulatory, patenting, rogue national security, financial, scientific, and media barriers confronting the inventor. An inventor or small company cannot overcome such obstacles. Therefore, a strategic plan and capability commensurate with these barriers must be devised and executed in order for new technologies to succeed."
Einstein, Albert: "...the scientist makes use of a whole arsenal of concepts which he imbibed practically with his mother's milk and seldom if ever is he aware of the eternally problematic character of his concepts. He uses this conceptual material, or, speaking more exactly, these conceptual tools of thought, as something obviously, immutably given something having an objective value of truth which is hardly even, and in any case not seriously, to be doubted. ...in the interests of science it is necessary over and over again to engage in the critique of these fundamental concepts, in order that we may not unconsciously be ruled by them." [Albert Einstein, "Foreword," in Max Jammer, Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969, p. xi-xii.]
Einstein, Albert: "Concepts which have proved useful for ordering things easily assume so great an authority over us, that we forget their terrestrial origin and accept them as unalterable facts…The road of scientific progress is frequently blocked for long periods by such errors." [Albert Einstein and L. Infeld, Evolution of Physics, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1966.]
Einstein, Albert: "There is no such thing as an empty space, i.e., a space without field. Space-time does not claim existence on its own, but only as a structural quality of the field." [Albert Einstein, Relativity, The Special and General Theory, translated by Robert W. Lawson, Henry Holt, New York, 1920.].
Heisenberg, Werner. "I believe it is possible to utilize magnetism as an energy source." [Nobelist Werner Heisenberg, 1927].
The Narrowness of Science
Josephson, Brian. "… I realized that the way science is done by consensus could get things completely wrong. I feel that it’s important to try and correct the errors that scientists are making." [Brian Josephson, quoted in Alison George, "Take nobody’s word for it," NewScientist, 9 Dec. 2006, p. 56].
Josephson, Brian. On the refusal of scientists to believe new results outside the conventional model: "I call it ‘pathological disbelief’. The statement ‘even if it were true I wouldn’t believe it’ seems to sum up this attitude." … "It is like a religious creed where you have to conform to the ‘correct’ position. This leads to editors blocking the publication of important papers in academic journals. Even the physics preprint archive blocks some papers on certain topics, or by certain authors." [Brian Josephson, quoted in Alison George, "Take nobody’s word for it," NewScientist, 9 Dec. 2006, p. 56].
Josephson, Brian. "…skeptics can always say that there must have been something wrong with these experiments. This means that you can never really prove anything, and a skeptic doesn’t actually have to discover anything wrong to dismiss an experiment." [Brian Josephson, quoted in Alison George, "Take nobody’s word for it," NewScientist, 9 Dec. 2006, p. 56].
Josephson, Brian. "Had it not been ridiculed back in 1989, we’d probably all now be using energy generated by cold fusion. So it’s really important to speed up the [acceptance] process." [Brian Josephson, quoted in Alison George, "Take nobody’s word for it," NewScientist, 9 Dec. 2006, p. 57].
Josephson, Brian. On cold fusion: "You have to look properly at the evidence typically blocked from publication by journals such as Nature, and few people are willing to put in the effort to do that. Even better, go along to a laboratory where the work is being done. It’s also hard to change how people think. People have vested interests, and their projects and reputations would be threatened if certain things were shown to be true." [Brian Josephson, quoted in Alison George, "Take nobody’s word for it," NewScientist, 9 Dec. 2006, p. 57].
O’Leary, Brian. On New Energy: "…don't rely exclusively on those mainstream scientists, journalists and pundits who deny the reality of new energy. They are just as ignorant as those scientists who denied the practicality of aviation even after the Wright brothers were flying.
But to expect the Wrights to immediately deliver a 737 would have been unrealistic." [Brian O’Leary, Open Letter from Brian O'Leary to Al Gore - Energy Innovation Act of 2007 - New Energy Movement, at http://newenergymovement.org/olearygore.aspx.]
Tolstoy. "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." [Tolstoy].
Tesla, Nikola. "The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." [Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless," Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.]
Tesla, Nikola. "Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].
Tesla, Nikola. "Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].
Tesla, Nikola. During an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls, Tesla stated: "We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium..." [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].
Tesla, Nikola. "Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].
Tesla, Nikola. "United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States," Vol. 320, Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America vs. United States, June 21, 1943, p. 1-80. Record of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in 1943 that Tesla's fundamental radio patents had anticipated all other contenders, including Marconi.
Feynman, Richard. "First, there is no electrical resistance. There’s no resistance because all the electrons are collectively in the same state. ... A current once started, just keeps on going forever." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III, Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Third Printing 1966, p. 21-08]. http://amasci.com/feynman.html
'Excellent article by Hank Mills:'
Aether Flow -- The True Electric Current? - Could it be that the flow of aether in the form of electric field is the true "electric current", and electron flow is only a byproduct? Some researchers, including potentially Nikola Tesla, seem to think so! (PESN January 27, 2012)'''
Pretty much sums up what I've been presenting to the New Energy Congress via my research papers, along with my collaborated research with Tom Bearden and demonstrated via my applied research via the 30 coil monopole system, designed, engineered and built by Renaissance Charge LLC and paid for by me personally. John Bedini has effectively vindicated Nikola Tesla via the 30 coil monopole system, licensed by him, and paid for my myself, giving Rick Friedrich the right to build it for me.
Tesla’s radiant energy was Dirac’s ‘negative’ energy captured via the mechanism of the ‘monopole.’ Eliminate the current flow within the circuit and the ‘negative’ energy which Tesla termed as radiant energy will flow within the circuit. Structure the circuit, so that the negative energy can be captured, stored within a capacitor (battery), so that it can then be redirected as ‘static’ voltage. Then, re-structure the circuit converting the ‘static’ voltage into alternating current flow.
For those who are not aware of it, the 30 coil monopole system is the upgrade to the original Jim Watson machine from the 1984 Conference at Colorado. Site:LRP:The Thirty (30) Coil MONOPOLE System
I elected to have Rick Friedrich build the 30 coil monopole at Renaissance Charge LLC because of the close proximity to Energenx and John Bedini. I knew that those two gentlemen would effectively permit the construction of my device, under absolute and rigorous protocols of quality control. Since my device contained thousands of parts and involved significant protocols, pertaining to magnetism and timing protocols involving movement, I knew the serious difficulty that could be encountered, which at any time could derail the project. Because of the tenacious persistence of Renaissance, and Rick Friedrich's dogged desire to provide quality results, I knew that eventually they would succeed in providing the result hoped for by myself and Tom Bearden. My hopes were not in vain, they were successful and as a result they have literally vindicated Nikola Tesla regarding his claim of Radiant Energy and the 'wheel-work of nature' Site:LRP:James Clerk Maxwell
All the Best,
'Leslie R. Pastor'