Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter


Site:LRP:Collaboration with Dr. Thomas Eugene Bearden on Simplification:Procedural Process of the M.E.G.

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:38 am.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Collaboration with Dr. Thomas Eugene Bearden on Simplification:Procedural Process of the M.E.G.

by Congress:Member:Leslie R. Pastor.


In a recent paper Tom Bearden explains the difficulty of Research and Development. Most people have no concept of actual research dealing with 'novelty of fact' science analysis incorporating 4-Space phenomena. One just doesn't go to Radio Shack and buy a grab bag of electronic parts and creates a new physics paradigm, let alone a new form of technology. Tom Bearden explains:

A prime example of what Tom Bearden is stating, can be demonstrated with the fundamental discovery of, and the development of the computing system, which further developed into the Information and computer technology of the Twentieth (20th) and Twenty-first (21st) Century:


The simplification of a complex complexity is only as simple or complex as the model demonstrated. In truth, nothing is really simple, only the models, that we use to describe the complexity. For instance, in describing the actual Universe, with all of its various rotating structures and various references, a two (2) dimensional diagram does not adequately demonstrate appropriately three (3) and four (4) dimensional attributes. Our brain and thought ‘constructs’ perceive 'reality' based on perception. We fill in the gaps with our individual 'knowledgebase.' Thus we are limited by our skills and perceptions, rather than by our abilities at cognification. We must never become hostage to our 'models,' merely use them as tools or references in defining our perceptions of 'reality.' Our models should be updated as our perceptions improve or change when confronted with newer 'novelties of fact.'

The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, which essentially harnesses the rotation of the Universe, as Tesla postulated, referring to the 'wheelwork of nature,' essentially draws its 'energy' from the 'vacuum of space-time.' This is the same 'energy' that causes the electrons to spin, the galaxies to rotate, and our Earth to rotate on its axis as it orbits our Sun. It is the ultimate energy source. "It has been initially postulated and then shown to be the virtual state fluctuation energy of space-time, being the nonobservable attribute of the vacuum of space. The interactions of virtual particles on observable masses are already considered by particle physicists to generate all forces of nature. The zero-point energy of any observable particle is the observable and proven "jitter" of that particle at zero degrees absolute temperature, as shown by the Casimir effect. The continual emission of copious real EM energy flow (real observable photons) by jittering observable charges is due to their absorption and coherent integration of virtual particle energy while the particle is in existence and therefore totally ordered individually. The individual smallest particles of a statistically disordered system or medium, can be and are continually and momentarily reordering, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics, in a manner analogous to the statement by Maxwell (who was also a thermodynamicist). Quoting:

"The truth of the second law is … a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules… Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." [Maxwell, J. C., "Tait's Thermodynamics II," Nature 17, 278–280 (7 February 1878)]."

Bernard Haisch and Hal Puthoff risked their careers and their livelihoods in revealing the Zero Point Energy of the Vacuum of Space-Time. Together they have essentially laid the very foundations for extrapolation of its seething power. In a recent email discussion, Tom Bearden acknowledges.


Bernard Haisch

Hal Puthoff


Less Than Zero Point Energy (A Perspective)


The foundations are being laid for one of the most interesting paradigm shifts since Nikola Tesla gave us Alternating Current [his first 40 patents] complete with single phase and three phase motors, not to mention his significant tesla coil, and the actual transmission of real observable POWER throughout the planet.


In a recent email, Tom Bearden explains [in a nutshell] how the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator works:

First the MEG uses a proven technique (the Aharonov-Bohm effect) which the nanocrystalline core furnishes freely. Recall again that memory characteristics of materials is one thing (from Prigogine) that allows direct and intentional violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

This free initiation of the AB effect in turn engineers the surrounding vacuum outside the core, by adding extra energy density to it in the form of a curl-free A-potential. Sharp perturbation (the rise time and decay time) of the input pulses that perturb the core-confined B-field, also perturb that section of the A-potential still in the core, so that a disturbance of dA/dt passes outside the core and on outward into the external altered vacuum with its extra energy.

There the equation dA/dt = - E applies, and so in the external activated space real E-field energy pulses are formed which radiate back into the MEG core area, due to the minus sign which means they travel in opposite direction to the outward-traveling perturbation dA/dt.

Hence this shows the receipt by the MEG of excess EM energy freely transmitted back into it from the external altered space, which means that the MEG gets considerable excess E-field energy input from the surrounding vacuum. By adjusting perturbation rise times etc., one can adjust the magnitude of the E-field energy pulses returned to the MEG from the external vacuum environment. Thus the MEG is an asymmetric Maxwellian system of the kind arbitrarily discarded by Lorentz in 1892, and still arbitrarily discarded by present EE departments, professors, and textbooks.


There are significant Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model - Tom Bearden Explains:


Practical Electrical Over-Unity Devices


Broken Symmetry


Broken Symmetry in 3-Space from


Also there are seven (7) significant papers on Tom Bearden's website that explain the:

General Relativistic Violation Of The Conservation of Energy Law

Source Charge, Van Flandern Waterfall, & Leyton Geometry

Electromagnetic Energy From The Vacuum

Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs. Magnetic Field B

Increasing the Coefficient of Performance of Electromagnetic Power Systems by Extracting and Using Excess EM Energy from the Heaviside Energy Flow Component

Permissible NESS COP>1.0 Electrical Power Systems Taking Energy From the Vacuum

Thirty-four (34) Flaws in Classical EM Theory


In case you’ve missed it: space is not something out there, but rather it is something right here, all around us, permeating and surrounding us, merely demonstrating that we are but mere mass and oceans of space filled with the seething vacuum with its immense source of real power both in the observable and virtual state throughout the entire planet, the solar system and beyond throughout the galactic domain of space-time.

To put it delicately and hopefully in a more clarifying 'observable' fashion:

If one had the power to discharge all of the electrons within their bodies and to coalesce all of their nuclei together into one cohesive group, they would not be able to visualize themselves on the head of an ordinary common pin.

We are essentially comprised of mere 'energy' [mass] and [virtual] space. We owe our very existence to the seething 'vacuum of space-time.' For it appears that ALL real POWER comes directly from it. We live and breathe, and have our existence by virtue of its presence.


The Kozyrev experiments provide significant clarification.


In a recent email request I asked Tom Bearden to explain the Nature of ZPE and how it differs from 'energy from the vacuum.' Since the MEG draws its source from the 'virtual state' of the vacuum of space-time.

I also requested that he explain what a 'source charge' is, and that he clarify what a 'circuit' is, thus ultimately explaining how loads are powered.

Understanding what 'energy' is----is probably the most difficult subject to understand and conceptualize. We know that 'energy' can neither be created nor destroyed, and yet we have difficulty in understanding where it actually comes from.


Tom Bearden - Open Source Energy Network - Video

(copy and paste into an MS Word or email document and double click)


Precursor Engineering: Directly Altering Physical Reality


The Quantum Potential is a Direct Energy Amplifier


Quantum Potential Weapons


In a recent email dated: June 5th, 2006, Tom Bearden stated:

"It’s okay to use this, and now it refers the interested reader to the fundamental papers we’re citing on There they can find those diagrams on exactly how the MEG conditions its local vacuum and then initiates that activated vacuum into freely furnishing excess energy input to the MEG. And they can see a diagram of exactly how the "generator powers the circuit," so they can see that it is not powered by cranking the generator shaft. They can also see the horrid results of the EE’s building only symmetrized systems. That practice (caused by Lorentz’s arbitrary symmetrizing of the Heaviside-Maxwell equations in 1892, and the continued symmetrization of them to this day in all EE power engineering) is exactly what has led to the escalating energy crisis worldwide, and threatens even the continuance of Western civilization itself.

Best wishes,



From: Leslie R. Pastor

Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:49 AM

To: Tom Bearden

Subject: Re: Please take a look -- tell me if it needs correction

Good Morning Tom,

I would like to post this response to page 4. Is that OK with you.

All the Best,

Leslie R. Pastor

----- Original Message -----

From: Tom Bearden

To: 'Leslie R. Pastor'

Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 12:01 PM

Subject: RE: Please take a look -- tell me if it needs correction


All EM systems taking and using excess energy from the vacuum for COP>1.0 operation, first must initiate an "exciting" of their local vacuum, so that the "excited" local vacuum then has the additional energy -- and in proper form -- to furnish to the system.

Don’t worry! Excitation of the vacuum is very simple, since every charge and every particle is engaged in an ongoing fierce interaction dynamics with the seething vacuum. When you do anything to the charge or particle, you do it to that set of interactions, which includes affecting the vacuum dynamics and changing them as well. Here are a couple of quotes:

"…curved empty space is a dynamic entity, as competent to store and carry energy as are ordinary elastic materials and electromagnetic waves." [John A. Wheeler and Seymour Tilson, "The Dynamics of Space-Time," International Science and Technology, Dec. 1963, p. 62.]

"...the concept of a 'single particle' actually breaks down in relativistic quantum field theory with interactions, because the interactions between 'the particle' and the vacuum fluctuations (or virtual quanta) cannot be ignored." [I. J. R. Aitchison, "Nothing's Plenty: The Vacuum in Modern Quantum Field Theory," Contemporary Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 357.].

The problem is that the EE model was put together before general relativity, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, gauge theory, and quantum field theory -- and "active vacuum" concepts -- were even born. So the EE model itself has no "recognition" of those operations in it which do excite the vacuum (and curve spacetime) to have additional energy. Since the EE model does not include the active vacuum’s interaction, it also does not include how an EM system or circuit is powered in the first place. It isn’t powered by cranking the shaft of the generator. It’s powered by the proven broken symmetry of a dipole (opposite charges), once the charges inside the generator are forced apart into an internal source dipole. Once formed, that dipole continually absorbs virtual photon energy from the seething virtual state vacuum, coherently integrates it to quantal size, and continually emits real, observable photons, pouring out of the terminals of the generator as the energy flow through space along the conductors. The tiny Poynting part of that flow gets diverged into the circuit to potentialize it, and that "collected potential energy" on the charges in the circuit are what "powers" the current flow and the system. Cranking the generator shaft puts in mechanical energy which gets transformed into rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator. That rotating magnetic field energy then forces opposite charges inside the generator in opposite directions, forming the dipolarity between the generator terminals. And that is all that cranking the shaft of a generator does. In physics, as Lee pointed out, a broken symmetry means that something virtual has become observable. And the asymmetry of the source dipole, once it is made, thus accepts virtual energy from the vacuum and transforms it into real, usable EM energy. Broken symmetry was proven in 1957 and it caused a great revolution in physics. Yet its full implications have not migrated across the campus from the physics department to the electrical engineering department, and the flawed EM model has not been corrected and updated. For known errors in the CEM/EE model, see “Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model," . This paper was reviewed by the National Science Foundation in 2005 and passed their review.


See the NSF letter at


E.g., 'potentialization" of a circuit actually changes the energy of the local vacuum in which the circuit is embedded. And the dipolar circuit also puts a "gradient" in that energy density, across the circuit. Hence there is an increased "virtual particle flux" of the vacuum, interacting with every charge in that circuit, and there is a gradient (across the circuit) of that excited vacuum. This means that the charges in the circuit are now involved in an extra virtual particle flux, and one having gradient and direction dynamics.

These gradient and direction dynamics are called "fields" in the EE model, and so it is actually the altered vacuum that is furnishing the energy and "driving" the current through the circuit, etc. That altered vacuum is what the EM "fields" and potentials are.

The alteration of the vacuum is "work-free", since work is only involved when the FORM of the energy is changed, but not when only the MAGNITUDE of the energy-in-the-same-form is changed. Work is rigorously the change of form of energy, NOT the change of magnitude of energy. Since the vacuum is the "ultimate" potential, and all other potentials are merely "parts" of it with specific characteristics, then the vacuum potential can be freely altered without having to do work. That actually is the foundation for ALL thermodynamics, but just hasn’t quite been realized yet by the thermodynamicists (but they are closing in on it!). To ease the thought, just remember that voltage is a potential, and voltage amplification alone is not work and requires no current (no ongoing dissipation).

So potentialization is or can be absolutely work free, because changing the master vacuum potential is work-free.

If the charges in the circuit are free to move, of course, then as soon as the fields and potentials change (i.e., as soon as the vacuum is excited and the ongoing interaction between charge and vacuum is altered), then the current will flow. Voltage (scalar potential) x current is POWER, which is the time-rate of doing work (changing the form of the energy). In short, when the current is flowing, work is being done in the system losses and loads by dissipating (changing the form) of the energy in those losses and loads.

If one "pins" the electrons in a circuit momentarily so that current cannot flow, and potentializes the circuit during that "pinned" time, and then switches away the STATIC VOLTAGE source, one has sent and collected excess, real, usable EM energy in the "pinned" circuit freely, without work being done. Then if the circuit "gap" left by the removal (switching away) of the static potential source is closed by switching in a diode and resistor in series, the circuit is re-completed in manner such that – once the pinning time expires – the potentialized circuit will freely drive current through itself, powering its loads momentarily while also killing its own dipolarity. But one will get some "free powering" of the loads, paying only for a little switching (which can be made very efficient). Then one can repeat that switching and "potentialize while current is pinned" process. So that type approach will also produce a COP>1.0 electrical system.

Here’s the point. The language and concepts of the CEM/EE model do not include the active or altered vacuum, hence our electrical engineers innocently ignore the actual vacuum engineering that is ongoing and they themselves are doing in their circuits and systems! What has to be done, in order for the overunity community to EVER understand "energy from the vacuum" (EFTV) systems, is to retranslate the language and major concepts of CEM/EE so that they now include AND OVERTLY SHOW the accompanying vacuum engineering actions that are occurring.

I’ve just started that really tough task of translating the "language" of the CEM/EE model’s major concepts into more modern physics, but it will take quite a while (probably about six months before enough progress is made to have something to put in a decent paper, etc.). If I can just get it done conceptually, but with sufficient rigor, and hang it on my website, then the young doctoral candidates and post docs in EE who also know physics as well, can and will rapidly finish the job.

To understand EFTV systems, one has to have such a "translation" ongoing in his head, or at least the gist of it. The lack of that "mental translation" is what is the real problem in EFTV systems and for most of the folks who are seriously attempting to deal with overunity EFTV systems. Most are electrical engineers or have an electrical engineering background, hence miss the vacuum engineering.

In the abstract to my newest "MEG and AB" paper, note how I started with such a mini-translation. We first stated that the vacuum itself, because of its extreme energy density, is a POTENTIAL. Indeed, it is THE fundamental potential, from which all other potentials (and thus all fields, which are naught but changes to potentials and their dynamics) are made. That sets the stage for "vacuum engineering", and it begins the translation that is going to take quite awhile yet.

But by using an ASYMMETRIC effect (the AB effect) which is outside the CEM/EE symmetrized model, the MEG actually first engineers and "activates" its local vacuum, with that extra curl-free A-potential that appears OUTSIDE the core, in the local vacuum, while the B-field (the curl dynamics of the overall A-potential) is localized inside the core. So the A-potential itself (a part of the overall "master" vacuum potential) is separated into its two components (the curled component or B-field, and the uncurled component) and the curled component is localized inside the core by the AB effect action of the nanocrystals and of the layered nanocrystalline structure. The uncurled A-potential component is not localized there, and it extends on into the outside space. So that space (that vacuum) is now "altered" by having the "mother or overall potential" of the vacuum changed in a specific way.

Now that the immediate local vacuum is freely "excited" in a specific USABLE way, the actions done in the operation of the MEG now take advantage of the "USABLE WAY". By adjusting the rise time and decay time of the pulses of input energy fed into the "input coil", not only is the confined B-potential affected (as in a normal transformer), but also the sharp perturbations travel on out of the core in the nonlocalized uncurled A-potential. The perturbation dA/dt moves outward, creating concomitant sharp E-field energy pulses in the vacuum potential itself by the simple well-known equation dA/dt = - E. The minus sign on that response E-field means that these externally generated E-field pulses (generated in that extra excitation energy of that vacuum) will travel or radiate backwards with comparison to the traveling perturbation. Hence those E-field energy pulses from the externally perturbed curl-free A-potential (the externally perturbed external excited local vacuum) will move back into the core of the MEG, from all the surrounding space (the surrounding perturbed curl-free A-potential).

I drew some diagrams of that action, in the paper, to give the reader a direct visualization of those processes, since "a picture is worth a thousand words". The paper is "Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs. Magnetic Field B," which is available at: .

The magnitude of the sharp returning excess E-field pulses is adjusted by adjusting the rise time and decay time of the main input signals to the input coil of the "transformer" section. One can easily adjust these E-field pulses to such energy that they simply burn out the insulation on the windings of the MEG.

For all those returning free A-potential pulses, every coil on the MEG is also an "input" coil, receiving excess E-field energy. In other words, the "transformer" section now operates mostly with ELECTRIC FIELD, once the feedback process is ongoing from external excited vacuum.

But the returning E-field pulses have all sorts of phases. And each coil or wire etc. absorbs and reradiates, to all the others. Hence there results a sort of "dense signal environment" in the MEG, and one must do some adjustments so that reasonable phase addition is obtained in the generated dense signals. With that done (note we have not released how we do that!!!) then there is a large additive and thus usable "return signal" from the external activated vacuum. At that moment, one has a nice asymmetrical Maxwellian system, NOT describable by conventional CEM/EE, which nonetheless receives extra E-field energy back from its local vacuum, collects and uses that excess energy from the vacuum environment, and thus now operates analogously to a common home heat pump. The EFFICIENCY of the MEG is always less than 100%, as are all systems. But with an extra usable energy input from its active environment, the MEG is permitted by the laws of physics and the laws of thermodynamics to exhibit COP > 1.0.

Well, the final problem is that most folks in the overunity business do not really understand the exact difference between COP and efficiency, and tend to ERRONEOUSLY state that we are saying the efficiency can be greater than 100%. That is not true. So the second paper we just posted on our website, is a paper by Moore, Stockton, and Bearden clearly laying out "efficiency" and "COP" and precisely showing their difference, etc. and what is permitted in systems.

Anyway, that’s the thing in a nutshell. The real problem is to get the translation of CEM/EE concepts done so that the person thinking in that model is also thinking properly in "vacuum engineering". If one is going to "get extra energy from the vacuum", one is going to have to engineer (set up) that vacuum (the master potential) with excess energy, in a manner so that some of that excess vacuum potential energy can and will be input back into the system from the altered vacuum.

It is the VACUUM ENGINEERING aspect of a legitimate EFTV EM COP>1.0 system that permits it to produce COP>1.0, even though its efficiency is always less than 100%. The efficiency of a common home heat pump, e.g., is only about 50%, so it wastes (dissipates in its losses) half of all the energy it receives, from whatever source (operator and environment). Yet it receives so much excess heat energy from its environment, that it can still output more heat energy than the amount of electrical energy the operator pays the power company to input. So its efficiency is about 50%, while its COP is usually between 3.0 to 4.0.

There is a present move, of course, to increase the COP of heat pumps, so we may see some before long having COP = 7.0 to 8.0.

Hope all that helps.




In Tom Bearden's most recent email [June 11, 2006], he states:


Very good job! It’s a delight to know you and work with you!

I only have one small additional suggestion: Please remark that we have deliberately produced a new paper with drawings detailing the exact action of the Aharonov-Bohm effect used in the MEG. These drawings illustrate very clearly exactly how the external vacuum is first engineered to contain extra energy, and then how that altered external vacuum is perturbed so that E-field energy pulses are generated there, returning back into the MEG as addition and free EM energy inputs from the active external vacuum/spacetime. Please list the title of the paper and the link, which are "Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs. Magnetic Field B," available at:

Very best wishes and thanks for all your hard work there!

Hang in there,



Phase (2) Two:

Incorporates Part (2) Two: Showing that there are Two (2) key fundamental components of the EFTV Process Structuring the 'energy flow' of the MEG.


Part (1) One of the MEG simplification process was completed earlier and uncovered significant new sources of documentation that were further verification of the fundamental nature of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect.

Part (2) Two of the MEG simplification process has been completed, which necessitated an intervening interview with Dr. Thomas Eugene Bearden in Huntsville, Alabama, regarding the fundamental process that enables the ‘Energy From the Vacuum’ to formalize. Essentially there are two (2) key fundamental components of the EFTV process that ‘structures’ the dynamics of the ‘energy flow’ enabling the MEG to ‘structure’ a continuous energy flow from the vacuum. Dr. Bearden will provide the appropriate diagrams and phenomenology as they are revealed and clarified during the actual procedural process of formalizing the MEG mechanism later this year as funding is achieved.

[1] The Aharonov-Bohm Effect [extended by Michael Berry to the Berry Phase, then further extended to the Geometric Phase]. Sources:

Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, "Phase Change During a Cyclic Quantum Evolution," Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 58, 1987, p. 1593-1596.

[2] The unique nature of the Nanocrystaline Cores:

The MEG resembles a transformer, having a core of special nanocrystalline material, input coil or coils in the primary, and output coil or coils in the secondary. Its operation, however, is quite different from that of a normal transformer. The special nanocrystalline core material used in the MEG has a very special characteristic: The material itself freely localizes an inserted B-field (from the input coil, or from a separate permanent magnet, or both) within the core material itself. Therefore it also freely evokes the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect. Outside the core, there freely appears an extra curl-free magnetic vector potential A. The MEG thus has two (2) energy reservoirs: (i) the perturbations of the normal B-field energy and flux of any transformer core resulting from the signal (perturbation) input to its primary coil(s), but now totally localized within the core material, and (ii) an extra perturbed free A-potential energy reservoir freely appearing just outside the core material itself. Consequently, the MEG is free to output the normal amount of energy from the B-field flux that a normal transformer would output, and also as much extra E-field energy as it receives and collects from the A-potential in space outside the core. The equation for that extra input energy is dA/dt = - E. Note that the minus sign on the E means that the E-field energy radiates back into the MEG from surrounding space. Also note that, by adjusting dt for each perturbation (which is just adjusting the rise time and decay time of the pulses that are input by the operator), the magnitude of these back-fed E-field energy pulses can be readily altered.

This free E-field energy impinges back directly upon the MEG’s "output" coil else which now also serves as an additional input coil. The free E-field energy also impinges back upon the input coil, and each wire as an antenna. Almost all the B-field produced by the output coil is localized in the core material running through it and held therein. The E-field energy from space outside the core thus also strongly activates the output coil (and the input coil and any wire, etc.) in almost a purely electric field manner, rather than in a mostly magnetic field manner. The MEG becomes a largely "electrical" transformer! The output current from the coil of a properly adjusted MEG is almost in phase with the output voltage (within about 2 to 5 degrees). Hence the MEG is almost completely using its induced Aharonov-Bohm effect for its energy input—very different from any other power system transformer.

The MEG thus has become directly analogous to the heat pump. It has one energy reservoir—the localized B-field in the core—whose energy the operator must furnish and pay for. But it also has a second, free, environmental energy reservoir—a curl-free A-potential—freely available in the external environment. The thermodynamic efficiency of the MEG is always a bit less than 100%, so the law of conservation of energy is rigorously obeyed. The second law of thermodynamics is violated permissibly, since strong, sharp gradients such as the sharp pulses used in the MEG are already known and accepted to allow second law violation, as pointed out by Kondepudi and Prigogine in nonequilibrium steady state thermodynamics.


The phenomenon of the MEG is so novel that the exact phenomenology of each receiving coil or antenna reradiating to all the others and vice versa, is still being ascertained by its ‘inventors’ who undoubtedly will incorporate and apply the appropriate ‘terms’ and ‘terminology’ as they are uncovered and anticipated in the upcoming months of ‘extensive’ research during its developmental stage within the appropriate ‘research and development’ period.


From: Tom Bearden

To: 'Leslie R. Pastor'

Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 9:53 PM

Subject: RE: Phase (2) Two of the MEG simplification process has been completed, which necessitated an intervening interview with Dr. Thomas E. Bearden

Hi Les,

Yes, the write-up is looking good! Many thanks indeed for all your efforts and research to understand the principles!

I made a few revisions and slight corrections to the write-up

(highlighted in yellow mostly), but you captured the exact mechanism for using the extra free environmental A-potential energy reservoir – thus allowing COP>1.0 operation even though as usual the thermodynamic efficiency of the MEG remains below 100% (for a good core material and build, it’s about 90% to 95%). The MEG is also one of those long-discarded asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, permitted by nature but arbitrarily excluded by Lorentz in 1892, just to simplify the Heaviside-Maxwell equations and get closed solutions without all the numerical methods. That arbitrary symmetrization and limitation of the theoretical CEM/EE model is what arbitrarily discarded all Maxwellian systems which would achieve heat pump type operation and COP>1.0, using a permissible extra energy reservoir of energy in the vacuum.

Note also that the extra energy density of the spacetime (vacuum) outside the core does in fact cause local curvature of spacetime – which also violates the CEM/EE model’s assumption of a flat local spacetime. It also means (particle physics view) that the local virtual particle flux of the vacuum outside the core has been altered, so that it is no longer "inert" as assumed in CEM/EE.

Since Lorentz did that terrible emasculation of the Heaviside limited version of Maxwell’s theory, the classical electrodynamicists and electrical engineers have continued to use only those Lorentz-symmetrical equations. In short, what is actually taught in all our universities as "Maxwell’s theory" is actually that Lorentz-Heaviside model. For the original Maxwell theory, see James Clerk Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover, New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. A copy of that paper, along with comments by the editing scientist, can be had from Amazon etc. for about $15. It is James Clerk Maxwell, The Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, edited by Thomas F. Torrance, Wipf and Stock Publishers, Eugene, Oregon, 1996.

T. Barrett, a superb and well-known electrodynamicist, stated it this way:

"[T]he A field [for the potentials] was banished from playing the central role in Maxwell's theory and relegated to being a mathematical (but not physical) auxiliary. This banishment took place during the interpretation of Maxwell's theory... by Heaviside... and Hertz. The 'Maxwell theory' and 'Maxwell's equations' we know today are really the interpretation of Heaviside... Heaviside took the 20 equations of Maxwell and reduced them to the four now known as "Maxwell's equations." [Terence W. Barrett, "Electromagnetic Phenomena Not Explained by Maxwell's Equations," A. Lakhtakia, ed., Essays on the Formal Aspects of Electromagnetics Theory, World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1993, p. 11.]

So the very first thing that a legitimate COP>1.0 EFTV Maxwellian system must exhibit is violation of the standard CEM/EE model. Specifically, it must violate Lorentz symmetry. Thus the equations of ordinary electrical power engineering cannot be used to model or to understand the MEG’s operation (or any other legitimate COP>1.0 EFTV system).

Using higher group symmetry O(3) electrodynamics – a far more complete theory than the CEM/EE model), rigorous proof that violating Lorentz symmetry does allow energy from the vacuum to be achieved by the resulting asymmetrical Maxwellian circuits is given by M.W. Evans et al., "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517. Note that this is a peer-reviewed and refereed standard physics journal.

Hope this helps.

Best wishes,



References Regarding the Aharonov-Bohm Effect


An understanding of the Aharonov Bohm Effect is important, even critical in appreciating how the M.E.G. performs, and functions. It is so important that I’ve decided to provide significant research regarding the AB Effect in the simplification.

Research: Aharonov-Bohm Effect [Significant Document] [Significant Document]

History of the B(3}Field Test of AB Effect [Important Document]

Significant Power-Point Document on A-B Effect

Blacklight Power [Aharonov-Bohm Effect] [Important Document] [Cavendish Lab]

Wolf Foundation Prize in Physics

Wolf Foundation Prize in Physics

National Academy of Sciences [Important] List of Publications

Higher Symmetry Electromagnetics: [Important Significant Papers]

Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy

Strong Magnetic Field Converts Nanotube from Metal to Semiconductor and Back [Aharonov: Professor of Physics]

Zero Point Energy: Historical Background and Perspectives:

Chronology of Quantum Mechanics, Molecular, Atomic, Nuclear and Particle Physics

Timeline & Chronology

Publications by Myron Wyn Evans:

YAKIR AHARONOV, Publications

Laboratory Tests On Dark Energy:

Utilizing Scalar Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy

On a Testable Unification of Electromagnetics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics

A New Quantum Effect is Predicted and Confirmed

David Bohm

David Bohm: Books:

The Magnetic Vector Potential A

Einstein’s Vision:

Quantum Shot Noise From Shottky to Bell.

The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator: How it Works

Quantum Phases & Quantum Coherence

The Internet Foundation

Sir Michael Berry

James Clerk Maxwell & The EM A-B Effect

Quantum Interference & Quantum Paths [Interesting & Significant]

Miscellaneous & Adjunct References:

Maxwell’s Original Theory The Holy Grail of Physics

Cosmology in the Laboratory

Magnetic Monopole:

Tom Bearden Interview:

Tom Bearden’s Energy Research


Meg Builders Group:

Berry Phase Effects in Magnetism

Berry Phase Effects in Magnetic Nanostructures

Professor Sir Michael Berry [Publications]


The Fundamentals Necessary To Understand Overunity And Free Energy


Perpetual Motion: Tom Bearden Explains


Myron Wyn Evans

Recommendation for Priore Type Project

VYtUL8OU7s4 _on5Xvw1sEY -9anvz_y_Zs

Site:LRP:Energy From The Vacuum