Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:43 am.
{|style="width:100% vertical-align:top border:1px solid #abd5f5 background-color:#f1f5fc text-align:left" |
! style="border-bottom:1px solid #abd5f5 background-color:#d0e5f5 padding:0.2em 0.5em 0.2em 0.5em font-size:110% font-weight:bold" |This is a new page!
|-
|
There was an error working with the wiki: Code[3]
: ''This is a new technology-related article needing expansion. You can help PESWiki by expanding it and are invited to help us add to its contents.
: ''After There was an error working with the wiki: Code[4], click the "edit" link above. Further information might be found in a section of the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[5]. Please remove this message once the page has become more mature and adequately developed.
|}
The phrase "Over Unity" typically refers to systems in which more energy comes out than was apparently put in. That is most likely a function of a new, unseen input source not yet recognized or measured. Theoretically all energy comes from existing energy and is only transformed from one form to another. Some over-unity claimants purport that the new energy is being generated ex-nehilo (out of nothing). Most would reject that stance and just wait patiently for new discoveries of where that energy is coming from.
: "In my opinion, from an energy loss and friction point of view, it depends on the system you're talking about, but anything even close to 100% (e.g. 98%) would have to be overunity because it would take excess energy from external to the system in order to overcome those losses.
: "But to be practical, it depends on the system, but the bottom line is it needs to be able to self loop with practical amounts of energy left over.
: "But that is an engineering issues. If you have something that is definitely overunity, then getting those engineers to help isn't so hard." -- Congress:Founder:Sterling D. Allan, October 15, 2012