Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 12:42 am.
There was an error working with the wiki: Code,
There was an error working with the wiki: Code
There was an error working with the wiki: Code,
There was an error working with the wiki: Code
Founded Nov. 2005
Shortcut URLs : http://newenergycongress.org
Mission Statement : The New Energy Congress is a global association of experts who review the most promising emerging energy technologies. We publish the Top 5 Exotic Free Energy Technologies list, taking into consideration criteria such as: availability, affordability, environmental impact, sustainability, reliability, scalability, and safety. We also facilitate their emergence into the marketplace.
Main Contents : Congress:Latest • Congress:Top 100 Technologies -- RD • Congress:Top 100:Complete List • Directory:Best Exotic Clean Energy Technologies • New Energy Congress: Validation Service • Submit a Technology • Congress:Technology Criteria • Congress:Members • Congress:What Membership Entails • Congress:Bylaws (rd)
There was an error working with the wiki: Code/ Directory:New Energy Systems Trust (NEST) / New Energy Congress > PES/NEST $5 Billion exotic free energy international budget - Someone made the great suggestion that we outline what we would do with five billion dollars. This is the beginnings of that exercise. Your constructive input is welcome. (PESN February 18, 2014) Latest: Current events >Events:Breakthrough Power March 30 - April 2, 2009 - On March 30 through April 2, 2009 there will be several presentations, including to the Harvard Club of San Francisco by Review:Breakthrough Power by Jeane Manning and Joel Garbon co-authors, Joel Garbon and Jeane Manning as well as Sterling Allan, Founder of the NEC which generates the Top 100 energy listing. (PESWiki)
We will focus on energy systems that tap into inexhaustible, ubiquitous, and clean sources of energy generation, such as solar, wind, tide, and geothermal, but also including non-conventional avenues such as zero point energy, radiant energy, cold fusion, and magnet motors. (If they do indeed prove to work as claimed.)
The purpose of the congress is to provide quorum review of leading technology claims, to assess viability and prioritize then facilitate advancement. Most deliberations will take place by email, privately. In-person retreats (pow wows) will also be scheduled to discuss these matters, preferably on a semiannual basis -- probably in the Fall, and in the Spring.
Let's do something meaningful toward ending the frustration that comes with all the bogus claims that float around. There just has to be legitimate science in the midst of all that noise. Together we can methodically dissect the haystacks in short order and find the needles!
By each one of us putting in a little bit, we combine into a formidable repository of wisdom. When our collective stamp of approval is on something, that will carry tremendous weight.
Eventually we will have a central location with a laboratory of our own, but meanwhile, among us are those who have the tools for accurate testing of technology claims. Furthermore, as we draw from people worldwide, there is more of a chance that we can go to the inventor with a group of qualified testers nearby, for technology evaluations.
'APPROVED': The following priorities were approved by the New Energy Congress on Nov. 29, 2005.
While we will eventually review all deserving new energy device claims, from solar and wind to cold fusion and zero point energy, we will need to have priorities by which we can triage the abundance of claims and requests that are sure to be presented to us.
As a general principal, the best way to start an energy revolution is to put plans of an excellent, working device into the hands of the world population.
This list is supplemental to the criteria set forth at Congress:Technology Criteria. This list is likely to be expanded and clarified over time.
Clean takes priority over polluting
Low environmental impact takes priority over high impact (including EMF)
Open-source-willing takes priority over exclusive scenarios
Cutting Edge takes priority over already-established technologies
Simple takes priority over complex.
Ubiquitous materials takes priority over rare
Home generator scale takes priority over grid scale
Portability takes priority over fixed position, other things being the same
Not-yet-funded, or woefully inadequately funded takes priority over adequately- or better-funded technologies
Well-developed prototypes take precedent over nominally-developed prototypes, other things being the same.
In the process of Congress:Technologies to Review, we will be compiling an extensive database of claims. This will be of very high value, and can be a source of revenue to help cover expenses and possibly even provide a stipend for congress members.
Congress:IT:Blueprint - For designing the programming needs for the receiving of technology review requests, screening those, and then honing in on a few technologies in detail.
Congress:Top 100 Technologies -- RD - Primary, regularly-updated report.
This PESWiki website often reflect the brain trust input from the NEC in deciding which technologies to feature. We are also anticipating publication of an annual book featuring the Top 100.
: (Alphabetic sequence by last name)
: Congress:Member:Hal Ade, Congress:Member:Adrian Akau, Congress:Member:Sterling D. Allan, Congress:Member:David J. Baxter, Congress:Member:Charles Bensinger, Congress:Member:Jonathan Bonanno, Congress:Member:Joel Garbon, Congress:Member:Richard George, Congress:Member:Francis Giroux, Congress:Member:Sepp Hasslberger, Congress:Member:Troy Helming, Congress:Member:Robert Indech, Congress:Member:Stephen Kaplan, Congress:Member:Eric Krieg, Congress:Member:Mathew P. Mathai, Congress:Member:Robert A. Nelson, Paul Noel, Congress:Member:Leslie R. Pastor, Congress:Member:Paul Richard Price, Congress:Member:Ken Rasmussen, Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen, Michael Riversong, Congress:Member:Tai Robinson, Congress:Member:Demetrius Ross, Congress:Member:Noah Seidman, Terry Sisson, Congress:Former Member:Ian Soutar, Congress:Member:Andrew Ferrand Stobart, Congress:Member:Nicholas Testad, Congress:Member:V.S. Travkin, Congress:Member:Renrick A. Tulloch, Congress:Member:Gary Vesperman,
There was an error working with the wiki: Code. And Advisors.
'APPROVED': The following list was approved by the New Energy Congress on Nov. 3, 2005.
Experience in the field
Generally respected in the field
Service oriented -- in it for mankind
Open to input from others
Not one-track-minded on one device or area
Open minded to new modalities
Well connected to those in the energy field
Vested interest in a particular technology does not disqualify one from being able to serve in this congress, nor for advising on that particular technology. However, such vested interests must be disclosed.
See also: Congress:Tasks
(do not modify this section)
Several of the members are extremely busy, and most of the members will have cycles of extreme preoccupation with other matters that require their immediate attention. While this is permitted, it is understood by the Congress members that they will give the Congress the attention they can give it, to the best of their ability. There are Congress:Tasks for maintained membership in the Congress. It is 'not a sinecure'.
: sinecure (SY-nih-kyur SIN-ih-) noun: An office or position that requires or involves little or no responsibility, work, or active service. (Dictionary.com)
Presently there are no dues. NEC is primarily made up of volunteers. Expenses are being covered by .
All Congress members should be subscribed to these:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NE_Congress - Main newsletter. Private. Membership approval required. Expected volume: 1 message/day or less. "web only" option not recommended unless you are good at checking online regularly. This is one you will want to recieve direct into your main email box.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEC-Forum/ - Membership approval required. A private, non-moderated discussion list for general discussion regarding New Energy Congress matters. This forum is for talking about the idea of the congress, and other administrative/housekeeping matters. For example, the criterion by which technologies will be judged would be a good discussion topic. The question of intellectual protection would also be appropriate, as would the pros and cons of open sourcing in general. General strategy discussions would likewise be germane.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEC-TechRev - Membership approval required. Private, non-moderated discussion of technologies under review. Because this is a non-moderated, high volume list, you might want to have your settings to digest or email only. But each member needs to be able to access the archives.
Each committee may have a discussion list for committee matters and issues specific to the committee. Members should be subscribed to their primary committee.
See Congress:Committees page for links to Committee discussion lists.
Each of the key technologies under consideration (must have a verified, working prototype or substantially reliable claim to a working prototype) will have a discussion list specific to it. The naming of the groups should be someone standardized to make recollection easier.
e.g. a discussion group to review Tom Bearden's MEG would be named http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEC_MEG
The preface for each list, therefore, will be "http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEC_"
Each member will serve on at least one committee in which he/she excels.
No one company or association shall have more than 10% representation in the membership unless that company or association has no direct benefit from sales or promotion of energy technology, other than increased traffic and reputation.
The representation composition shall be made public, along with pertinent statistics (e.g. x% from U.S., y% from w company.)
No one genre of new energy (e.g. wind, solar, cold fusion) shall have 25% or more representation, determined by the member's naming a genre of primary interest or focus.
Ideally, all genres shall be represented by at least one person who names that genre as their primary interest or focus.
Deliberations between members regarding technologies shall remain private except those portions that are already public by proper consent, or when proper consent is given.
Each member will serve on at least one
There was an error working with the wiki: Code in which he/she excels.
A member must disclose if they have any financial interest in a given company/technology, and must recuse themselves from participating in voting, though they may provide input.
Never at any time should a member violate any non-disclosures they have signed pertaining to a technology in discussion.
A member must disclose any gifts or financial benefits they may have received from a company/technology being considered. Such disclosure should include any possible future gifts or financial benefits.
Members should participate in the final voting process at least once a year.
Members should attend a retreat at least once every other year (four opportunities).
Same as Members' Rules of Conduct, except they will not participate in voting, or be required to attend the retreats.
In addition to reviewing technologies, the congress might address other matters as a decision-making body:
Technology criterion and weighing factors
By-laws for the congress
Member and advisor approvals
Administrative matters (such as website and database hosting particulars and security)
Event venue selection
Cost for basic and premium reports
General guidelines for what constitutes "free", "basic", and "premium" content
Determine stipend level
Other energy field matters as appropriate
In addition to this technology review function, members could also be involved in
Peer review of papers for publication (ergo PeerPedia)
Advisory roles for germane companies
Congress:Top 100 Technologies -- RD - A working draft document, listing the top 100 clean energy technologies. You need not be a member of the Congress to participate in populating and sequencing this document.
A non-comprehensive listing, in alphabetical sequence. Not all these qualify as "
There was an error working with the wiki: Code" per the definition above, but to the extent that they move society profoundly away from reliance on fossil fuels and other polluting, non-renewable energy dependencies, they will be considered for review and ranking.
Brown's Gas •
Carburetor Add-ons •
Casimer effect •
Cold electricity •
Cold Fusion •
Compressed Air •
Fuel Cell •
Fuel Additives •
Fusion, Hot •
Gravity Motors •
H from Water •
Human Powered •
Hydro-magnetic dynamo •
Joe Cells •
Low-temperature phase change •
Magnet Motors •
Negative resistance •
Neutrino voltaics •
Noble gas plasma engine •
Power Factor Correction •
Pipe Pressure •
Solid State Generator •
Stirling Engines •
Tesla Turbines •
Thermo Electric •
Vortex energy •
Waste to Energy •
Zero Point Energy
These criteria will be prioritized and weighed. All qualifying technologies will be considered for review. A petitioning process will be available for technologies.
See: Congress:Technology Criteria where this listing will be fleshed out.
Non-encumbrance (does not impinge on prior art claims)
Sustainability (non-depleting energy source)
Prototype status (how far along? how many?)
Number of independent replications
Efficiency of power generation
Present stage of development
OS willing? (What do you mean, "willing"? What is the alternative? Where has the profit model worked with FE devices? Since energy is the basis of money, an FE machine wipes out the scarcity-economy wherever it operates.)
Closeness to Market
Company Viability (Do they have what it takes to take the technology the distance?)
Experience in the field
Business plan feasibility
Energy source availability (24/7/365) [e.g. solar and wind are transient]
Cost (cents/kw-h, taking the following into consideration)
Size/footprint per kw
Simplicity--low number of parts, high percentage off the shelf parts
Safety of the device (does it emit EMF, radiation, could it explode?, could it be modified into a weapon of mass destruction?)
Environmental effects (does it present mechanical or explosive hazard does it emit heat, magnetic fields, etc.)
Copaceticity (Has beneficial or neutral effect on infinite energy field/zero-point dimension, to avoid repetition of terrestrial environmental catastrophies on quantum level)
Production of scale (low and high feasible)
Availability of materials
Ease of Installation
Ease of use and maintenance
Technologies in a given class will generally be measured against other technologies of that class, though an overall ranking will also be provided regardless of class.
We will focus on giving exposure to companies and technologies that are up-and-coming, to foster emergence of new energy modalities of merit. For technologies already in the marketplace, we will serve as a professional review for consumer's benefit.
Submitted technologies and promising technologies that otherwise come to the attention of NEC members are usually first passed by the Technology Screening committee to see if they should be presented to the NEC body for voting. Presently, a simple poll is created for that technology which asks where the technology ranks:
Not Top 100
Not enough info
These results are then tallied on a regular basis to update the
There was an error working with the wiki: Code listing.
The named company or inventor will have opportunity to provide a statement in response to the review of their technology/product.
NOTE: These are preliminary. proposed pricings and are subject to change by the NEC.
Free : Thumbnail sketch available for free for everyone. Might not include some companies/technologies that are not yet intended to be public knowledge. The expected market for this will be general research by the lay public.
Basic : Report highlights. Fairly simple report. Might not include some companies/technologies that are not yet to be public knowledge. Projected cost: US$50 per person. The expected market will be casual investors, energy enthusiasts, and inventors.
Premium : License to the full report. Signature required to keep certain company's information private. Projected cost US$1,000 per person, with groups discounts for multiple copies. Non-profit discount for energy organizations: US$250.00. The expected market will be high-level investors, major non-profit energy organizations, government.
Revenues will go toward covering expenses of those members and advisors providing peer review as well as the administration of the process and preparing of the reports. Stipends, as agreed upon, may also be disbursed to participating members. Excess proceeds beyond that will go toward grants of deserving technologies agreed upon by the members.
Expenses will include:
travel to retreats
retreat lodging and transportation
When revenue is not adequate to meet expenses, the expenses will be paid by a percentage (e.g. 50% travel covered)
Currently launching this congress (not that this is the first time anyone has had an idea along these lines).
Places and times to be announced.
Fall 2008, London
Spring 2009, Detroit
Fall 2009, Mexico City
Spring 2010, Miami
Fall 2010, Munich
Spring 2011, Houston
Fall 2011, Melbourn
Venue locations will be rotated to be within proportional proximity of members. If you are a member, and one of the above locations is within ~2000 miles of where you live, feel free to change the capital location to one closer to you.
July 2006, Salt Lake City
Sept 2006, Washington, D.C.
Spring 2007, Nashville
Fall 2007, Toronto
Spring 2008, California
Submissions, first screening, second screening, post-retreat review, final approval of report.
Name changed from "Free Energy Congress" to "New Energy Congress", effective Oct. 15, 2005
We are working on getting some funding to cover travel and other expenses for this first retreat. However, you will need to be prepared to cover these largely from your own pocket.
This project is being hosted at PESWiki.com, which is a publicly editable website. New sub-pages should be named as followed: "http://peswiki.com/energy/Congress:NAMEOFPAGE" (note placement of colon) and then linked from this home page. Sub-sub-pages should be named "http://peswiki.com/energy/Congress:sub-page:sub-sub-page" with a link to it from the appropriate sub-page. Sub pages should link back to this main congress page as well as to any related pages. There are Help:Contents and Help:Format tips pages for your assistance.
See also Congress:Members
New Energy Congress in the News - separate page
Not part of NEC, but similar in purpose.
Institute for New Energy Database - Headed up by Patrick Bailey. Last Updated: January 25, 2003.
SEAS Power - "SEAS has a database of hundreds of systems. Alas, we have yet to find one that is a) built and operational b) available for independent verification and reproducibility and c) therefore worth bringing forward in the world. We remain hopeful such a device/system may yet be extant somewhere on earth." -- Steven Greer (Sept. 28, 2005)
Product Evaluation Database by Terry Sisson (FE_Congress members only)
A New Manhattan Project for Clean Energy - Erich J. Knight points to the areas of new energy research that he deems to be the most fruitful, including nanotechnology, thermionics and fusion. (ZPEnergy Sept. 21, 2005)
World Energy Engineering Congress - Annual convention of the Association of Energy Engineers. "The Association's more than 8,000 members include energy engineering and management professionals from throughout the U.S., as well as 71 nations abroad. AEE is dedicated to providing industry information, conference and seminar programs, reference books, marketplace surveys, and professional certifications including Certified Energy Manager, Certified Lighting Efficiency Professional, Certified Energy Procurement Professional, Certified Power Quality Professional and others."
World Renewable Energy Congress / Network (WREC/WREN) - "A major institution for renewable energy promotion."
World Renewable Energy Congress VIII (energy.gov) - August 31, 2004 in Denver, Colorado.
World Energy Congress - "Widely recognised as the premier global all-energy event on the calendar, and has been running since 1924."
Renewable Energy Congress VII - 29 June- 5 July 2002, Cologne, Germany.
World Renewable Energy Congress 2005 - Connect Scotland's business network provides technology start-up companies with financial and networking opportunities through its events, seminars and ...
REEEP - World Renewable Energy Congress - Renewable Energy, Technology, Innovation and the Environment
more Google > (141,000 results)
Pass your ccvp training on first try using PMI Certification practices questions and ccvp certification prepared by certified experts to provide you guaranteed success they also prepare mcdba training dumps & Testking 70-649 papers with full devotion.
- New Energy Congress main page
There was an error working with the wiki: Code
There was an error working with the wiki: Code