Like us on Facebook and Follow us on Twitter


Free Energy Blog:2013:11:07

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:37 am.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Free Energy Blog posts from Thursday, November 7, 2013


Image:Collage labeled 95x95.jpg
Latest: There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1] > There was an error working with the wiki: Code[2] - Latest include: Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:08Free Energy Blog:2016:02:02Blog:Index (PESWiki Bullet updated February 13, 2015 23:15 GMT)

Blog Archive

Next Day

Free Energy Blog:2013:11:08

Event:The 2014 Colloquium on CF/LANR at MIT -- 25th Anniversary

Just posted:

Template: 223

-- SilverThunder 22:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Must Read Crosswalk, about Geoengineering

'Free Energy Blog:2013:11:07'

Relevance: Directory:Weather Control > Directory:Chemtrails

Last week, I published the following story:

Template: 2104


I need to follow-up. At the time, I had only just barely started into the really good stuff. I had no idea how the book was going to proceed from there.

I need to say that the book has been astonishing in laying out the how and who -- not by name, since it's a fictional novel, but by scenario. It is chilling stuff. A must read. Those who are geoengineering our planet have only control and money in mind, not the welfare of the planet. It is corruption at its darkest level.


Remember, the book starts very slowly. You don't get into the juicy stuff until about page 76, when it starts picking up interest. In fact, I don't think the plot is very strong, and you could probably be just find diving in on that page, and reading from there. All you'll be missing is the author describing a lady who's mother has been killed, and she finally decides she wants to find out why.

-- SilverThunder 20:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

RAR Energia Gravity Motor Patent Application Published

'Free Energy Blog:2013:11:07'

Relevance: Directory:Gravity Motors > Directory:RAR Energia Ltda Gravity Motor

Frank Acland over at brought this to my attention.

US 20130256066 A1: Mechanical motion system for energy generation Publication type: Application Application number: US 13/757,488 Publication date: Oct 3, 2013 Inventors: Renato Ribeiro

Abstract: A mechanical system includes beams, a crankshaft, bars connected to one another through rollers or supported to one another and a weight. Energy is transferred from the force of gravity on the weight support bar and the weight through the positive or neutral bars and the central shaft to the crankshaft arm, generating a torque on its shaft. The choice of the bar on which the weight support bar and the weight itself will be supported is enabled through placement or removal of the locks on the support arc-locks. The value of the force of gravity existing on the weight support bar and the weight itself, when they are supported on the neutral bar, is the same. Therefore, with the weight hanging on the central shaft or on the end of the weight support bar, the value of the force of gravity that drives the central shaft is the same.

Image:US-20130256066-A1 700.gif

-- SilverThunder 14:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

FE Inventor Bemoans Negativity in Comments

'Free Energy Blog:2013:11:07'

Relevance: Housekeeping

: From [withheld]

: To: Sterling Allan

: Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:23 AM

: Subject: Disinformation

: Hi Sterling,

: This is something that I've notice for awhile and wanted to make you ware of.

: I do not want to discourage you. I think you are doing you best under the circumstances. It is my hope that you can use this as constructive criticism to improve the conditions on the web site.

: I have noticed that there is a lot of disinformation going on with the peswiki website. The people making posts are discouraging valid people from coming forward and posting good information. This includes myself. I am working on things again despite my poor health. Unfortunately I feel the same as most inventors on this site. You say own worst enemy. I say that between the posts and some comments that it discredits inventors and discourages replication. It is disrespectful to the inventors.

: If I had a working model I would like in-person validation before even a key stroke of text was posted on the site. That would include even a mention of the trip to see it.

: Understand that most inventors take things personally, because they have put 100% of themselves into making the project happen. That leave 0% of there energy to put up with negativity and criticisms. This is myself included. Here is my rant on this.

: You have people doing post that have no idea what they are talking about and have not built one project. I have build projects that do weather stabilization and normalization by matching to the resonances and impedance in the atmosphere. There were negative side effect to it so I decided not to move forward with it. It could also be replicated easily and built incorrectly and cause more harm than good.

: Here is an example of what I'm talking about. This is what Directory:JasonDaz Self-Looped Motor-Generator in the Philippines wrote ...3 months ago

:: i had 0 kwh reading electricity bills for 5 months, but i dont want to share it cause theres nothing here is interested to support these new renewable technology and will end as non sense., ive read several comments including in my thread that almost 95% disagree, and always think this is not working. what a great forum.

:: how about to put some bet when it comes on testing? send your bet to sterling if possible after the test completion comment your findings. all you want to test in the machine is open for all.

:: if you look to request my plan. this is not possible. just test and bring all you testing device as well. thanks.

-- SilverThunder 12:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Popular Science Shuts Off Comments

'Free Energy Blog:2013:11:07'

Relevance: Housekeeping

Just FYI,

Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments - Starting today, will no longer accept comments on new articles. Here's why. (Popular Science September 24, 2013)

Regarding comment capability not appearing on recent PESN stories. Note that it is on MYT Engine stories, per Raphial's request about a year ago.

Some people are extra sensitive to negative slamming, and I don't blame them for wanting to spare themselves from the onslaught. Unfortunately, he found plenty of it elsewhere where his technology was being discussed. But he remains resolute. He'll be bringing us the future, one way or another. Love the guy.

-- SilverThunder 06:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Previous Day

Free Energy Blog:2013:11:06