Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:25 am.
Free Energy Blog posts from Tuesday, November 5, 2013
There was an error working with the wiki: Code>
There was an error working with the wiki: Code- Latest include: Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:08 • Free Energy Blog:2016:02:02 • Blog:Index (PESWiki Bullet updated February 13, 2015 23:15 GMT)
In talking to my wife just now, she said that there were four of these polls she voted on that malfunctioned. In three of them, after selecting an item and clicking "vote" the results showed "0" for the selection she had just voted on. So either someone has hacked these polls to manipulate them, or they are not functioning properly.
I'm curious if any others of you have had a similar experience. I'm guessing that it has been "hacked" to skew the result for the purpose of demoralization, because when I launched this poll this morning, I voted in all 12 polls and they all worked fine for me. When Cheri voted the same answer as I had in the Messiah poll (that's us who awake and put on strength), the tally showed "1" for that response, which would have been my vote. So that answer was permitted when I voted, but by the time Cheri voted, it didn't register.
Please send me an email if it doesn't register properly for you as well, and which ones didn't work properly for you. Thx.
An easy way to tell is to look at what the tally is now, then vote, and see if the tally changes, both for the number on the item you voted for, as well as in the total number of voters. This will be easist if you click on the hyperlink above the poll, which takes you to www.99polls.com where the poll is hosted.
The ones that definitely didn't register properly for Cheri were
http://www.99polls.com/poll_393660:1 Do you agree that there is something to this Alphabetics.me thing?
http://www.99polls.com/poll_393668:1 Your thoughts on Immanuel
http://www.99polls.com/poll_393670:1 What are your general sentiments about Alphabetics?
http://www.99polls.com/poll_393671:1 Your thoughts about Sterling doing a weekly show on Alphabetics on ThePeoplesVoice.TV
-- SilverThunder 23:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Finally got this feature page up. Was sitting on it for several days. Looks like it is #1 in our Top 5.
-- SilverThunder 22:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Relevance: Directory:Spirituality > Directory:Spirituality / Directory:Engines >
There was an error working with the wiki: Code > Events:2013:October 22-24:Sterling Allan Visits Raphial Morgado to Make Aviation 2.0 Announcement
This morning, I appended several polls to the end of the story I published last night.
Here are the questions:
Do you agree that there is something to this Alphabetics.me thing?
Did you read the whole Aviation 2.0 in Alphabetics article?
How much of the other Alphabetics.me material have your read?
Which of the above sections was most convincing to you, illustrating resonance?
Which of the above sections was least convincing to you?
Which of the above sections was your favorite?
What do you think about the Mark Dansie Phone # section?
Why do you think so few (1.5%) of the crowdfunder pledgers are actually contributing what they pledged? http://igg.me/at/aviation2
Your thoughts on Immanuel
What are your present sentiments about Aviation2.com?
What are your general sentiments about Alphabetics?
Your thoughts about Sterling doing a weekly show on Alphabetics on ThePeoplesVoice.TV
I encourage you to chime in at: http://pesn.com/2013/11/04/9602388_Sterlings-trip-to-see-Raphial-Morgado_and_Aviation2-in-Alphabetics/#Polls
-- SilverThunder 14:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Received this by email from Butch Holland. Definitely food for thought:
: I have been sitting on this info for awhile now, I am worried you will think I am sending you wild speculation and expecting you to believe in something you might not want to even deal with. The only reason I am sending this video is the information that starts at 29.39 minutes and only goes for about 10 minutes. It's supposedly a reply from something we sent into space and the reply came in form of a crop circle. I know..., but please trust me that if you have not seen this there may be a formula for new energy in this. I do not have the ability or know how to tell if this may work or just bunk. You are the only person I know that would know instantly if this is worth checking out. If it is solid then it could be very important, If not I do apologize for wasting your time.
(YouTube June 2, 2012)
-- SilverThunder 14:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
FREE ENERGY BLOG FOOTER
Free Energy Blog - latest
Blog:Index - title and description only
Template:130922:PESWiki:Free Energy Blog - the latest title listings
2015: Blog:2015:January | Blog:2015:February | Blog:2015:March | Blog:2015:April | Blog:2015:May | Blog:2015:June | Blog:2015:July | Blog:2015:August | Blog:2015:September | Blog:2015:October | Blog:2015:November
2014: Blog:2014:January | Blog:2014:February | Blog:2014:March | Blog:2014:April | Blog:2014:May | Blog:2014:June | Blog:2014:July | Blog:2014:August | Blog:2014:September | Blog:2014:October | Blog:2014:November | Blog:2014:December
October Free Energy Blog:2013:October:1-7 | Free Energy Blog:2013:October:8-14 | Free Energy Blog:2013:October:15-21 | Free Energy Blog:2013:October:22-28 | Free Energy Blog:2013:October 29 - November 5
PESN - Our feature stories
News - daily, from around the world
This Week in Free Energy™ - weekly wrap-up (recently it's been irregular digests)
Free Energy Now - interviews featuring specific technologies
NEWS BY TOPIC -->
There was an error working with the wiki: Code
There was an error working with the wiki: Code