Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 15, 2016 at 1:25 am.
METOZ overbalance concept by which device is said to be able to tap the energy of gravity, is elaborate but flawed, according to PES Science Advisor, Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen. Inventor, Zygmunt Or?owski, responds saying he has broken the law of conservation of energy.
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/GravityMotors/METOZ/metoz_400.jpg
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/?S=A
http://www.metozor.si.pl/paradox.html
http://www.metozor.si.pl/three_levers.html
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html
http://www.nets.pl/metozor/perpetual_motion_machine.htm
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/metoz.html Mathematical description
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/GravityMotors/METOZ/
From: "Zygmunt Or?owski"
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: TIFE index page at FreeEnergyNews.com
Cze??!
Dzi?kuj? za poczt? elektroniczn?.
Metoz you had seen is very old. I have got METOZ in other variant. More comprehensible.
This enclosure is clean. In my elaboration METOZ about, no one is able to find even small
mistake. [not true, see below]
I do want to sell the Metoz invention.E veryone is able to build just the model of METOZ
machine and test it.
It is not a long shot. It is very easy. Not complicated. I can help with the aid of E-mail
correspondence. METOZ will be able to produce real clean energy!!! Have a good look at
supplement at [bottom] part of web.
Zygmunt Or?owski
metozor@wp.pl
: Attachment (received from Zygmunt Aug. 23, 2005)
From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Metoz?
Hi Sterling,
Being in this field can be weary at times. While we
put tremendous effort into unlocking Nature's secrets,
lots of other people bog us down with worthless crap.
This is one of those bog-downs. I analyzed METOZ
months ago and the character is baraging us again, and
nothing was addressed from my analysis before. Tell
him to read my analysis and go away.
He has a flaw in his analysis and I pointed it out to
him. It shows up as the mass of the balance beam is
increased, simulated by identical weights on each pan
of the beam balance. At best, this Pole does not
understand English.
Ken
From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:19 AM
Subject: Fwd: Re: PureEnergySystems.com science advisor
Dear Sterling,
I sent this in case you were sent it also from Zygund
and were curious of its viability. His work is one of
the most elaborate I have seen. Unfortunately, I am
sure he is at a dead end, despite his work. His
website is http://www.metozor.si.pl/paradox.html for a full
viewing of his work if you did not receive his initial
email and are curious.
Ken
From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"
To: "Zygmunt Or³owski"
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: PureEnergySystems.com science advisor
Dear Zygmunt,
The Metozor idea is clever! Good observation skills!
I agree with your basic analysis but not with what it
can do. When the water valve opens to reduce the
water pressure, energy is lost. Pressure relief
dissipates energy, (V)(dP). Also, pressure
application requires energy input to the water, also
(V)(dP). There appears to be no net energy gain in
the cycle. The energy to tip the balance beam came
from the pressure source that did work on the beam and
water pistons. The same energy was dissipated, as
(V)(dP) is the same, just of opposite sign.
The anomaly is due to the same weights (100 kg in your
example) added to each side of the balance beam. This
is the same thing as making a more massive beam, and
of course the beam will deflect less, due to the
center of mass of the beam at point P. See how a more
massive beam in example C/3 would make a smaller
angle.
Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen
PES Science Advisor
From: "Zygmunt Orlowski"
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Metoz criticism
Thanks for your message.
The principal problem be colled : " Pascal's law ". Lot of people don't understand how is created
cycle : straightening.
In Poland nobody beliews that model of METOZ was able to realize the cycle "straightening".
After build that model i had sent a lot of letters to higher schools in Poland. No
one was interested to see model. In your country is identicaly situation. At least i had
made:
http://www.metozor.si.pl/paradox.html
and
http://www.metozor.si.pl/three_levers.html
and
http://www.metozor.si.pl/supplement.html
It is all. The " three levers" is for persons , which don't know how looks even arm
lever in "paradox", in model and in balance showed on photo of model.
The supplement is most important. There is the Pascal's law and few pictures of METOZ.
No one in all the world can say that there is mistake. Long time now I had broken " the law
of conservation of energy". Differently : "Energy cannot be made or destroyed, but it can change
from one form to another. Something more: " The total amount of energy is unchanged." METOZ can
take an energy from gravitation or is a "duplicator of energy". At present we can build real " perpetual motion machine"
Zygmunt Orlowski
Zygmunt,
Can you produce video tape footage of a prototype running? Can you show data from prototype? Do you have witnesses who are willing to attest?
-- Sterling A. Allan 21:42, 29 Aug 2005 (EDT)
From: "Zygmunt Orlowski"
To: "Sterling D. Allan"
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: Metoz criticism
Model of METOZ was destroyed about 2003. Only 3 person had seen METOZ's test. Nobody more.
Zygmunt Orlowski
From: "Ken Rauen"
To: "Sterling Allan"
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:10 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: Metoz criticism
[Zygmunt] is flat-out ignoring my analysis. I put
about two hours into the meticulous understanding and
analysis of his system and he is still trumpeting no
one finds any flaws.
Ken
Zygmunt Or?owski
Gdynia, Polska
Zygmunt Or?owski
phone: 048-58-711-84-15
(48 58) ... 624-68-36 ul.
Niska 1 b / 33 81-646 Gdynia
Metoz - page at FreeEnergyNews.com
There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1]