Talk:Directory:Google's 10 to the 100th Project

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:31 pm.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Discussion page for Directory:Google's 10 to the 100th Project

Image:Google10million95x95 byKevn.jpg

Google is marking its 10th anniversary by offering 10 million dollars for five of the best world changing ideas. After the submission deadline October 20th, 2008, a Google panel will announce 100 nominees on Jan. 27, 2009, to then be narrowed to 20 via Google user input. (YouTube)


post here

(Just click on the "There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1].)

From: Von Ives

To: Sterling D. Allan

Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 12:39 PM

Subject: Google's 10 to the 100th Project:

Hi Sterling:

I applaud Google's 10^100 project. I am sure some good ideas may result.

However, they have automatically excluded many potentially good ideas by excluding

any potential possible reward to the author of the ideas resulting from Google's help:

FAQ: "What do I get if my idea is chosen?"

Answer: "You get good karma and the satisfaction of knowing that your idea might

truly help a lot of people".

Many researchers (my self included) have spent a great amount of time, effort, and

personal resources to nurture new energy technologies forward. In our capital gain

motivation economic system one should expect to get some return from their labors.

They don't have to get the 'whole-pie'. All participating advancers of an endeavor

should expect to be rewarded for their contributions - expecially the originator!

Tesla and the English original iPod inventor, Kramer, are examples of being cut out of

their just rewards. There of course are many others.

I can assure you that if the Wright brothers (and many others) would have merely

presented their 'ideas' that only others would have profited from, there would be no

airplanes flying today! Not only that, if Google, of all people, had only presented

their 'business-model' to only others to profit from - there would be no Google today!

I appreciate altruism. But it comes at a price to somebody(s). "There ain't no free lunch"!

Our capitalistic system functions because rewarding endeavors help other people, but

the 'endeavorator' has to be rewarded also. Otherwise, economically, there is no motivation

to help other people in the process. Socialistic and communistic economic system failures

are proof enough of that.


Von Ives

See also


- Directory