Site:LRP:Suppression: Alternative Energy Systems: (Novelty of Fact) Freely Derived Sources

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:55 pm.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Suppression: Alternative Energy Systems: "Novelty of Fact" Freely Derived Sources by Congress:Member:Leslie R. Pastor


Recently found lost link:


Recently found lost link:


Recently found lost link:


History abounds with one form of suppression or another. It is literally a fact of life and past history, just look at your history textbooks and your own lives. Only now in our ("modern") age we are expected to believe that, there is no such thing as suppression, that, we live within the home of the brave and the land of the free. Nothing could be further from the truth. Recent developments, obviously, have proven that assumption to be false. Most individuals have no cognition of what ‘freedom’ means, they merely interpret what they have learned through ‘cognitive dissonance’ and immediately ‘suppress’ any form of information that violates their ‘structured’ milieu and predetermined concept of ‘reality’ facts. But the fact is, that, we ALL live within a ‘control’ paradigm, subjected upon us, without our consent, that structures and influences everything we do, from beginning to end. If you take a moment, you will know what I’m referring to, for it incorporates, all that you accomplish and structures the way you live, regardless of who you are, unless of course, you are an 'insider,’ a member of a trusted inner group, having privilege and ‘secret’ obligations. In that case you are ‘relatively’ nominally free.

If one were to have a ‘device’ that absolutely provided one with unrestricted continuous ‘energy’ for both home and travel usage, enabling one to come and go, to be and think, whatever and wherever they wanted to be, then, they indeed would be free. The ability to have unrestricted travel, without ‘fuel costs’ and to ‘light up’ your home ‘free of charge’ is indeed actual freedom. The nullification of those expenses, would translate into increased ‘adjustments’ in your time capabilities, and provide a significant transfer of wealth into your structured life, providing you with greater freedom to function as an individual. You noticed, that I have not mentioned the ‘M’ word, for it too, is a ‘control’ paradigm, created for the purpose of simplifying ‘commerce’ within our societies and indirectly, to control your activity while engaging in ‘commerce’ directly.

Well, be prepared for a shock, for there is such a thing as ‘free energy,’ specifically, ‘freely derived’ energy, without the need for ‘adjustments’ to your freedom, or your ability to ‘come, go, be, think and ultimately do’ what you wish to accomplish, without interruption or subservience to third parties or restraints by structured ‘commerce’ restrictions. Inventors and inventions exist, having provided significant inroads into just such ‘novelty of fact’ discoveries. Magnets and magnetism as a ‘form of change in motion’ and ultimately as a change in ‘form of energy’ ultimately is the key to ‘freely derived’ energy transfer. In physics we ‘know’ that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed,’ and we also “know’ that ‘energy can be altered in form and usage.’ But the reality is, that, no one really knows what ‘energy’ is. Think about it.

Nature has provided ‘freely’ derived ‘energy’ systems just for the taking, which we, blithely accept without reservation, without even an afterthought. But those that have taken the time to observe nature have been duly rewarded. Natural springs gush forth from deep within the Earth since the beginning of time forming into magnificent rivers, ultimately emptying into oceans of waters, replenishment without end. Why is this so? Where does the ‘energy’ come from to accomplish this? The force necessary to pump water is considerable. Water being eight (8) pounds per gallon requires considerable ‘energy’ as movement against the Earth’s gravitational field. To put this in its proper perspective, water traveling via capillary motion within our trees, upward, especially, in our Sequoia national parks, having heights of six hundred (600) feet or better, are able to accomplish this effortlessly as a provision of natural law. Victor Schauberger studied and understood nature, having observed the ‘natural’ laws. When he ultimately discovered the function of water, and how to harness it as an ‘energy’ source, he was suppressed, in the United States, I might add. Fusion reactions occur effortlessly within all forms of plant life, but when Dr. Martin Fleischmann attempted to provide similar action showing how this is possibly derived he was immediately ridiculed and railroaded out of the United States. Cold Fusion as it was initially termed is already a natural function and a process of nature. Nikola Tesla observed the rotation of the Earth, and discovering its ‘rotating magnetic field’ decided to build his own ‘model’ and created a facsimile, which ultimately became the basis for our current energy mode and transmission system utilizing his conception of alternating current. Carrier looking at the human body and its system of cooling via evaporation, designed an ‘air conditioner’ based on how the human body cools itself. His discovery is our net gain, especially in the long hot summers and deserts of planet Earth. The reversal of that system of cooling, known as a ‘heat pump,’ which essentially is a reversal of the evaporator and the condenser, enables one to extract ‘heat’ from the ambient atmosphere during winter. All of these systems were derived by ‘looking’ at nature, discerning the ‘natural’ laws, and looking at the human condition, because a need was anticipated, necessitating a solution, a solution I might add, which was not stymied by a powerful third party, because it ultimately benefited them as well.

We are at such a crossroads right now. Everyone is in the same dilemma, requiring full and complete participation from everyone, without exception. As W. Edwards Deming stated, “Learning is not compulsory, neither is survival.” We can either sink or swim, and if we are all in the same boat, we can either row in the same direction or we can oppose each other and go nowhere, and that choice is ultimately ours. Please make the right decision based upon the appropriate documentation that I present to you now:

As you already know and anticipate, I never make a statement of fact unless I have qualified sources as references, for I am aware, that significant ‘due diligence’ is a requisite for qualified research into subject-matter dealing with ‘novelty of fact’ data. Thomas S. Kuhn introduced the sciences to the structure of scientific revolutions, because he knew how difficult it was to bring forth ‘novelty of fact’ data into the mainstream science community. Peer pressure ultimately prevents quality ‘peer review’ of subject-matter from outside-the-group references, especially, ‘novelty of fact’ discoveries from outside-the-box thinking. Coincidentally, therefore, it is not surprising that most research regarding ‘freely derived energy’ systems come from non ‘structured-thinking’ individuals, who recognize the possibility of such ‘systems’ because they are not contaminated with ‘cognitive dissonance’ baggage. They are willing to recognize novel attributes not previously anticipated, because they have not lent themselves to previously learned encumbrances. They are therefore willing to learn continuously, having neither predisposition nor expectations as to outcomes, they essentially, are willing to ‘know what they don’t know’ as Dr. Antony C. Sutton would tell me in our private email exchanges in the late 1990’s. It was from him that I became familiar with Thomas Eugene Bearden and his M.E.G., having studied his method of extracting ‘energy from the vacuum’ for several years prior to finally engaging Dr. Bearden in significant review and simplification of his unique system of energy extraction, utilizing a permanent magnet, and specially constructed powerlite cores, utilizing the Aharonov-Bohm Effect, structuring the magnetic vector potential A versus the magnetic field B necessary for such achievement. In February of 2006, I visited with Dr. Bearden at his home in Huntsville, Alabama, where he showed me how and why the M.E.G. works. I detailed that information and gave it to the New Energy Congress primarily, and then established research pages, which explain the process in a concise coherent manner together with Tom Bearden’s valuable tutelage and references.

None other than the giant General Electric Company has tried to suppress the M.E.G. from being achieved, for it was GE who attempted to buy up Honeywell and did destroy that division which provided those Powerlite Cores, which the M.E.G. uses to contain its fields necessary for structuring the EFTV effect.

I have written this paper at the formal request of Todd C. Hathaway (NEC) who has asked me to research the actual suppression. All that is necessary is the formal implementation/protection so that our existing ‘inventors’ can accomplish and fulfill their desired ‘research’ unencumbered by death threats and personal economic destruction to themselves and their families.

From my point of view, what is essentially needed is a Funding Protocol and the establishment of an R&D Foundation for qualified inventors. It is my belief that: The NEC should form an R&D mechanism/foundation which would be funded up to $1 Billion dollars, which monies would be invested in secured accounts netting 10% minimum rate of interest, such profits from those investments, to be used solely for the purpose of funding R&D on both conventional and non-conventional ‘novelty of fact’ technologies. The R&D Foundation would select and award those ‘technologies,’ which would provide immediate and productive ‘utility of purpose’ for both general and commercial applications. The R&D Foundation would sell/lease licenses to enable the ‘technologies’ to have a broad range of influence and aggregate use. The licenses would be noncompetitive and open-ended. Monies collected from the sale of those licenses/leases would be reincorporated into the R&D Foundation for continued funding of ‘novelty of fact’ research. Finished and Refined products sold to the general populace and governments would generate royalties for the primary inventors for their ‘first fruit’ effort and ‘original’ ideas. It is understood that the normal ‘banking’ mechanism should not be used, because of their history of ‘sweeping the cash’ and delaying of funding tactics.

Wall Street Journal Sweeping the Cash.

'Leslie R. Pastor'

'New Energy Congress'

Actual Suppression Accounts:

Tom Bearden was personally notified that he was targeted for death, being informed by three (3) very interesting visitors one night a few years back at his home in Huntsville, Alabama. He heeded their advice and accepted their help, prolonging his life and extending his research abilities. Tom Bearden explains: "The new papers on my website have really gotten the cartels turned on against me again, so life has gotten "interesting" again, so to speak. Were it not for some very strong protection I have (from some folks who officially "do not exist"), we would have had that old "fatal accident", such as a fatal auto accident or a "sudden suicide on the way to the supermarket". Last I counted, we had survived more than a dozen suppressions or assassination attempts over the years. It hasn’t been easy. Fortunately these guys helping me are the guys who play very hardnosed football.”

Tom Bearden provides further accounts: (Tesla)

Of course, primary to suppression is the suppression of Tesla. Tesla knew that the EM wave in space is actually longitudinal, and he also discovered negative energy (which he called "radiant energy". He also knew the medium (i.e., what we call the

'active vacuum' or "active spacetime" today) was active and energetic, and that energy could be taken freely from it. Here are some relevant quotations:

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].

"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." [Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless," Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.]

"Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels."

During an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls, Tesla stated:

"We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium..."

"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].

Tesla’s intent (and his capability) to finish development and provide cheap, clean energy freely from the vacuum, would of course require asymmetrical Maxwellian systems. To totally discard all such systems, Lorentz was led or instructed to deliberately symmetrize the already curtailed Heaviside equations which were and are taught – modified twice further by Lorentz – as "Maxwell’s theory" today in all university EE departments and textbooks. That is a bald-faced falsity. But it focuses our entire vast electrical engineering effort onto ONLY THOSE REMAINING SYMMETRICAL MAXWELLIAN SYSTEMS, those that continually shut off their free energy input from the active vacuum faster than they can use part of it to power the loads. In short, this is specifically what guarantees the continued consumption of fuel etc. in our electrical power systems etc. And what continues to incredibly enrich the giant energy cartels etc. of the world. And the last thing the Cartel suppressors wished was general knowledge put out there openly on the internet of the known falsities in EE still being taught in all our universities, etc. Or the ramifications of Lorentz having just arbitrarily symmetrized the Heaviside already-seriously-curtailed equations in 1892 (he thereby arbitrarily discarded all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems, and retained only the symmetrical ones. That discarded a priori all the type Maxwellian systems that are permitted to receive and freely utilize excess EM energy from the active vacuum environment, since those systems are asymmetric a priori.).

Rigorous proof that violating the Lorentz symmetry condition allows excess free energy currents from the vacuum, is given by M.W. Evans et al., "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.

Anyway, we gathered together the listing of the known major falsities in electrical engineering, in a paper "Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model," available at . This one was also formally reviewed by the NSF, and it did (begrudgingly) pass their review. Their letter on this is available at .

For formal correction of the long-flawed old second "half-law" of thermodynamics, see T. E. Bearden, "Leyton’s Hierarchies Of Symmetry: Solution to the Major Asymmetry Problem of Thermodynamics," available at . This paper also discusses the necessary change from the very old 1872 Klein geometry to the much more modern Leyton geometry, which is necessary for explanation of the source charge’s continuous emission of real observable EM energy (real observable photons) without any observable energy input. As Sen put it,

"The connection between the field and its source has always been and still is the most difficult problem in classical and quantum electrodynamics." [D. K. Sen, Fields and/or Particles, Academic Press, London and New York, 1968, p. viii].

Kosyakov stated it bluntly:

"A generally acceptable, rigorous definition of radiation has not as yet been formulated." ..…. "The recurring question has been: Why is it that an electric charge radiates but does not absorb light waves despite the fact that the Maxwell equations are invariant under time reversal?" [B. P. Kosyakov, "Radiation in electrodynamics and in Yang-Mills theory," Soviet Phys. Usp., 35(2), Feb. 1992, p. 135, 141].

The Cartels also certainly did not wish an exposé and discussion of the ramifications of Lorentz – circa 1900 – just arbitrarily discarding the giant curled Heaviside EM energy flow component accompanying (and far exceeding in energy magnitude, by perhaps a trillion times) the very small Poynting divergent energy flow component that is accounted and taught. But there is already a proven process in optical physics – proven since 1967 and replicated every year in major universities worldwide – that does indeed curve spacetime sufficiently to force some of that usually nondivergent Heaviside curled energy flow to diverge anyway. The proven process, known since 1967, produces COP = 18 when optimized. Obviously that process is not in present EE at all, but it is good physics and already well-established – although the practitioners in the field do not understand where and how the excess energy input comes from. So they use a tortured phrase, “Negative Resonance Absorption by the Medium” (NRAM) instead of the proper “Excess EM emission from the self-resonant charges of the self-resonant medium”. They also do not discuss at all the thermodynamics of it, instead merely discussing the change in the “reaction cross section” of the absorbing self-resonant particles (note that in CEM/EE, the field energy density and potential energy density are defined by static interacting charges, not by self-resonant dynamic interacting charges).

Lorentz arbitrarily discarded that giant Heaviside energy flow component circa 1900. E.g., see H. A. Lorentz, Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik an der Universität Leiden, Vol. V, Die Maxwellsche Theorie (1900-1902), Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, 1931, "Die Energie im elektromagnetischen Feld," p. 179-186. Figure 25 on p. 185 shows the Lorentz concept of integrating the Poynting vector around a closed cylindrical surface surrounding a volumetric element. This is the procedure which arbitrarily selects only that small diverged component of the energy flow associated with a circuit—specifically, the small Poynting component being diverged into the circuit to power it—and then treats that tiny component as the "entire" energy flow. Thereby Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all the extra Heaviside circuital energy transport component which is usually not diverged into the circuit conductors at all, does not interact with anything locally, and is just wasted.

Unawareness of the giant Heaviside curled energy flow component also led to the twisted title of one of Bohren’s primary papers, e.g., which is Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?" American Journal of Physics, 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327. Quoting: "Under nonlinear conditions, a particle can absorb more energy than is in the light incident on it" [COMMENT: That of course is false because, if true, it would destroy the conservation of energy law itself, and the self-resonant charge would freely create all the excess energy it emits, from nothing at all). "Metallic particles at ultraviolet frequencies are one class of such particles and insulating particles at infrared frequencies are another." For independent replication and confirmation, see also H. Paul and R. Fischer, {Comment on "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?’}," Am. J. Phys., 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 327. The Bohren experiment is repeatable and produces COP = 18.

Note that the Poynting component is not the total energy flow through a point or unit cross section! Not at all. Jackson says it this way:

"...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that the curl of any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term can, however, have no physical consequences. Hence it is customary to make the specific choice …" [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237].

Jackson’s statement is true only in a reasonably flat spacetime – i.e., in a special relativistic situation, where the divergence of the curled Heaviside energy flow component is essentially zero. It is not true if the spacetime is rhythmically curved to and fro – as by charges in self-oscillation at the frequency of the input energy. In that case, it is false because the rhythmically waving “frame” is a general relativistic situation, and vector analysis and special relativity of common EM no longer apply.

That entire NRAM area was originally spelled out by Letokhov in 1967, except for deliberately withholding any mention of the Heaviside giant energy flow component.

In that respect, Ken Moore and I obtained a U.S. Provisional Patent Application (PPA) by means of which this proven NRAM physics "heat amplification" process (extracting and using excess energy from the always-present but always-neglected giant Heaviside component) can be applied to the steam boilers of an existing power plant (either hydrocarbon fueled or nuclear fueled), thus reducing its fuel (or fuel rod) consumption by about 75% while maintaining the same heat and steam in the boiler, and thus to the steam turbines powering the generators. A second adaptation for "{close-looping" and "self-powering" can also be applied. In that case, the improved power plant steam boiler(s) – once brought up to speed and smoothly powering the turbogenerators for the same electrical output but with only about one-quarter as much fuel consumption – can have the "closed-looping" switched in. At that point, all further consumption of fuel by the power plant will cease, and it will be totally powered by "energy from the vacuum", much like a windmill-powered electrical generating plant is powered by the freely flowing wind from the local environment. It is permitted by nature, physics, and thermodynamics, but it certainly violates Lorentz symmetrization, hence is allowed to produce COP>1.0.

Anyway, Ken and I then placed the PPA openly on my website, and freely passed it into the public domain and just gave it away to all humanity. Thus any of the big power consortiums that wishes to spend the money and do the adaptation development, can now proceed as they wish. The paper is T. E. Bearden and K. D. Moore, "Increasing the Coefficient of Performance of Electromagnetic Power Systems by Extracting and Using Excess EM Energy from the Heaviside Energy Flow Component," a PPA filed in October, 2005. It is available for free downloading at .

I’ve had high level informal contact with a leading scientific agency, and all one does is get turned over to the "electrical engineering" components. Good guys, yes, but totally out of it with respect to modern physics and any changes at all in the old 1880s EM model presently being taught. Cannot even comprehend the source charge problem or its importance. Cannot comprehend that a "static" field is actually made of many parts (photons) in constant motion, hence is a "nonequilibrium" steady state (NESS) EM and thermodynamic system far from thermodynamic equilibrium. Don’t understand the much more modern thermodynamics of such NESS systems far from equilibrium, and absolutely do not believe that – as is already known in that type thermodynamics – such a system is permitted to (i) self-order (closely associated with negative entropy), (ii) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (iii) output more useful energy than the operator pays to input (the excess energy is freely input and received from the active local environment, in this case the active vacuum), (iv) power itself and its load simultaneously (all the energy input is freely received from the active local environment, in this case the active vacuum), and (v) produce continuous negative entropy (closely related to self-ordering). The response (drawn from the much older and partially archaic "near equilibrium" thermodynamics taught at the sophomore level to engineers) is that "Prigogine went too far!"

Pointing out that the archaic old second "half-law" of thermodynamics can be easily violated at will, anytime one wishes, and that NESS thermodynamics already lists and accepts several such "second law violating" areas, falls completely on deaf ears. Yet one can check a listing of several known areas that are known and accepted to allow violation of the old second law. Simply refer to Dilip Kondepudi and Ilya Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998, reprinted with corrections 1999. Areas known to violate the old second law are given on p. 459. One area is strong gradients (as used in the MEG) and another is memory of materials (as also used in the MEG in the nanocrystalline core materials and structure). We strongly comment that these known, recognized mechanisms allow macroscopic and significant violations of the Second Law that are directly usable in real systems and circuits.

For a very clear and unequivocal technical paper totally describing how the MEG first engineers its local vacuum to have excess EM energy density, and then perturbs that excited vacuum so that it generates and emits E-field energy pulses back into the MEG itself, see "Engineering the Active Vacuum: On the Asymmetrical Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Magnetic Vector Potential A vs. Magnetic Field B," which is available at . We deliberately did some new drawings which clearly show the exact (and proven!) vacuum engineering that is accomplished by the MEG, to produce an asymmetric system freely receiving excess energy from its active vacuum environment. Thus the MEG process is one way of doing the vacuum engineering necessary to activate the local vacuum, then get that excited vacuum to generate excess EM energy radiated back into the system in usable form.

But it has become totally obvious that our own scientific community is absolutely not going to do anything at all about the energy problem, nor fund any young doctoral candidates and post docs to work in that area and correct that sadly flawed old electrical engineering model. They will still be preaching the same old electrical engineering electric power system model while the U.S. undergoes a total economic collapse, and then its enemies destroy us. [Unless we do something about it right now post haste].

For further research, Dan Solomon has done an admirable job of showing that an EM field applied to a small region of space (the vacuum) can in fact extract usable EM energy from that vacuum area.

As an example, this has often been done (but not fundamentally understood) by many experimenters when evoking the Lenz law effect. When – for example – a strong gradient in an EM potential (which constitutes a strong energy-density gradient in thee vacuum energy of that region) is applied to that small region of space, it suddenly adds differential EM field energy to the "electrons in the filled holes" in that space. This sudden gradient produces real EM forces on the occupying electrons in the Dirac holes, and lifts some of them right out of their holes and into one’s circuit. One thus gets a surge of real extra electrons evoked from the active Dirac vacuum (space itself) from that gradient region. This part of the Lenz law effect is well-known.

What has always been unaccounted in the Lenz law effect is that the remaining empty holes are negative mass-energy electrons, and hence – as source charges – they produce negative energy photons and thus negative energy EM fields. Having negative mass-energy, these holes also exhibit negative inertia and so they move in opposite directions from the out-lifted "real positive mass-energy electrons" with their positive mass-energy inertia.

These negative mass-energy currents (true hole currents) and their negative energy EM fields also are repelled gravitationally by normal positive mass energy entities and positive energy EM fields, since such "opposite energy" fields and "opposite energy" mass-energies mutually repel one another. So using such holes and negative energy fields produced widely in nature in sharp gradient processes in suns, planets, etc., one can account for the outside antigravity forces that produce (1) the acceleration of the expansion of the universe, and (2) the mysterious "drag" forces experienced by our Pioneer spacecraft and others. Also, one can account for the strange "lifting" and mass-changing effects that experimenters such as Hutchison gets in his experiments. One can also account for the startling and controllable antigravity force that Sweet was able to produce in his VTA unit, by pushing it to greater COP.

So Solomon’s applied field in space has produced a usable and free "surge" of positive mass-energy electron current, and also – in the other direction – a usable "surge" of negative mass-energy electron current. There is a concomitant surge in both directions of the opposing (negative energy versus positive energy) EM fields also. From those effects, practical antigravity and many materials effects can probably be generated eventually as younger experimenters find out about it and learn how to interpret and also use both kinds of currents and both kinds of energy.

The addition of excess real usable electron energy and positive EM potential energy to one’s circuit is a negative entropy operation. It is already known that this sudden surge opposes the dissipative change that is trying to occur. So, we should expect such a circuit to be able to violate the hoary old second law of thermodynamics. And so it is.

Again, if one moves from the very old "near equilibrium" thermodynamics usually taught to sophomore engineering students, and goes to the much more modern and comprehensive far-from-equilibrium dissipative systems, one finds that such systems can and do readily violate the second law. This is already well known to our leading non-equilibrium thermodynamicists. E.g., see Dilip Kondepudi and Ilya Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998, reprinted with corrections 1999. Some of the areas known to violate the old second law are given on p. 459. One area is strong gradients (as used in the MEG, e.g. and in many other pulsed COP>1.0 processes by various inventors) and another is memory of materials (as used in the MEG in the nanocrystalline core materials and layered crystalline structures to invoke the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which conditions and excites the local vacuum). Note that Prigogine’s strong gradient is one of the mechanisms proven and accepted to allow violation of the second law. We strongly emphasize that these known, recognized far-from-equilibrium mechanisms can be deliberately used by the inventor to allow macroscopic and significant violations of the Second Law. By producing negative entropy, the excess energy is directly usable in real systems and circuits. It can produce real EM energy in them, and that is what Solomon has shown.

If still concerned with the old second "half-law" of near-equilibrium thermodynamics, please see my formal but simple correction of that law in "Leyton’s Hierarchies Of Symmetry: Solution to the Major Asymmetry Problem of Thermodynamics," available at . This paper also discusses the necessary change from the very old 1872 Klein geometry to the much more modern Leyton geometry, which is necessary for explanation of the source charge’s continuous emission of real observable EM energy without any observable energy input.

Even Maxwell – who was also a thermodynamicist of some note – understood that the small elementary pieces of our macroscopic systems are continually violating the hoary old second law. Quoting Maxwell:

"The truth of the second law is … a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules… Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." [J. C. Maxwell, "Tait's Thermodynamics II," Nature 17, 278–280 (7 February 1878)].

Note also that EM systems producing and using such second law violations are asymmetric Maxwellian systems a priori. Such systems were arbitrarily discarded by Lorentz in 1892 by his symmetrizing the Heaviside equations just to get simpler equations! And Lorentz symmetrization – with its total and arbitrary discard of all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems – is still taught by all electrical engineering departments, professors, and textbooks. Electrical engineers are thus never taught to deliberately design, produce, and deploy those asymmetrical energy-from-the-vacuum systems! Indeed, their theoretical model simply assumes that such systems do not even exist in nature.

Nature did not and does not discard those asymmetric Maxwellian systems: Instead, Lorentz discarded them arbitrarily, and all our university EE departments, professors, and textbooks continue to arbitrarily discard them to this day.

In summary: Our universities and professors long ago arbitrarily and unwittingly discarded all permissible EM energy-from-the vacuum Maxwellian systems. And they still arbitrarily and unknowingly discard them. Obviously, this iron dogma should be corrected, but presently the leadership of the scientific community is not going to allow it to be changed. The great cartels in areas such as energy, medicine, and international finances will absolutely not permit its change without doing everything possible to stop it.

So the only hope of finally changing this hoary old 1880s and 1890s flawed theory lies with the oncoming younger scientists and engineers such as Solomon and others like him. As Planck pointed out:

"An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul. What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out, and that the growing generation is familiarized with the ideas from the beginning." [Max Planck, as quoted in G. Holton, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.]

For a rigorous proof in higher group symmetry O(3) electrodynamics that violating the Lorentz symmetry condition does indeed produce usable EM energy currents in the vacuum, see M. W. Evans et al., "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.

A surge of negative mass-energy electrons strongly appears to be a surge of the "dark matter" so avidly being sought by the modern astrophysicists. The emission of negative energy EM fields by these negative mass-energy "source charges" also appears to be the "dark energy" they also seek so avidly.

If so, then both dark matter and dark energy can be made in the laboratory by strong gradients (sharp fields) applied impulsively to short regions of spacetime in our circuits. One can evoke the dark energy and dark matter in real circuits, and thereby one can produce dark matter and dark energy in the laboratory. And, with some effort and some particle physics instrumentations, one can perhaps finally begin to understand their strange characteristics and odd behavior.

So the work of Solomon and others, struggling to show that real usable EM energy can indeed be extracted from the pulsed Dirac sea vacuum, actually has profound implications for the understanding of our universe and some of its most fundamental characteristics. It also has profound implications for developing energy-from-the-vacuum systems to solve the rapidly escalating world energy-from-fuel crisis. There is no real "energy" crisis per se but there is a real and increasing fuel crisis. Obviously, to permanently solve the problem, one needs to move from the energy from fuel approach to the energy from the active vacuum approach – just as advocated by Nikola Tesla.

And stimulating papers such as this one by Solomon are helping to do just that.

The problem facing us, however, is that several nations of the world have developed quantum potential weapons and devices, from David Bohm’s hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics. Further, the largest and most powerful cartels (which Churchill just generically called the "High Cabal") also have the use of such devices, since the cartels penetrate the governments and get access to anything of use to them, whether classified or not. It appears that the use of quantum potential effects is going to be used to directly "stop" legitimate overunity researchers who have systems approaching being ready for production and marketing with little additional difficulty.

In short, the High Cabal is going to dramatically increase that "little additional difficulty", to make it just about impossible.

So here’s a bit of insight into the quantum potential, its ability against such specific "small effect" local and specific targets, and how it will be used to stop the leading overunity energy systems of the leading inventors and researchers. The end purpose, of course, is so we do not quickly get "energy from the vacuum" electrical power systems, and thus avoid the coming engineered economic collapse as a result of the dramatically increasing "energy from fuel" crisis.

Quoting David Bohm:

"We have instead to start from nonlocality (action at a distance) as the basic concept, and obtain locality (field contact action) as a special limiting case." [D. J. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, "On the intuitive understanding of nonlocality as implied by quantum theory," Foundations of Physics, 5(1), Mar. 1975, p. 93].

“We have in this way introduced a concept that is new in the context of physics – a concept that we shall call ‘active information’... The basic idea of active information is that a form having very little energy enters into and directs a much greater energy. The activity of the latter is in this way given a form similar to that of the smaller energy.”

Note that "energy amplification" – for free – is a basic included idea in Bohm’s hidden variable theory, and in the use of the quantum potential itself.

To connect things back toward a corrected CEM/EE model of electrodynamics, one can interpret Bohm’s statement as a statement of what I’ve been referring to as "precursor engineering". Contrary to the CEM/EE model, the force field itself does not exist in space at all, as pointed out by Feynman in his 1967 three volumes of sophomore physics. Specifically, the precursor EM field in space is force-free, and it is just a "condition of altered spacetime" and its dynamics. The ongoing interaction of that precursor EM field (that altered spacetime and its dynamics) with charged matter produces the EM force fields in and on that charged matter. Altering and changing the precursor field and its energy, without interaction with charged matter, is work-free. This incorporates the little-appreciated thermodynamic fact that work is only the change of form of energy, and that change of magnitude of energy without changing its form involves no work at all. So the changes of magnitude (and thus the dynamics) of spacetime effects is free and does not require work. The proof, e.g., occurs unnoticed in CEM/EE, when one merely amplifies the voltage while holding the current to zero. Let’s look at that for a moment. That, incidentally, is a permissible negative entropy operation, legitimately violating the hoary old second "half-law" of equilibrium thermodynamics. Such violation is readily permitted in far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics again, for a listing of several areas known and recognized to permit the violation of the old second law, see Dilip Kondepudi and Ilya Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures, Wiley, New York, 1998, reprinted with corrections 1999, p. 359.

Electrostatic scalar potential (i.e., common voltage) represents a change in the potential electrical energy density of spacetime. Voltage (electrical energy density of spacetime) amplification alone (e.g., with current frozen by momentarily pinning the charges) is work-free. So merely "potentializing some pinned charges" gives the free "collection of excess potential energy" by those pinned charges. (Actually one has changed the local energy density of the local spacetime in which the circuit’s charges q are embedded, and so one has freely changed the intensity of the ongoing interaction between the circuit’s charges q and their local spacetime/vacuum. In short, one has directly "excited the local vacuum and its interaction back upon the charges q.

When the charges in that “potentialized circuit” are again unpinned so that current can again flow, the increased voltage (electrical energy density of the local vacuum) now interacting with the charges q produces much more current and work in the circuit than the former unamplified voltage would have done. Let’s look a bit further at that, and also at violating the ubiquitous Lorentz symmetry usually applied.

E.g., in standard CEM/EE, the amount of potential energy W said to be "collected” by a set of charges q in a circuit, from potentializing voltage V, is given by W = Vq. If the charges q are pinned during potentialization and the current thus is zero (i.e., given dq/dt = 0), we will increase the energy “collection” of those charges q by a very large amount (delta W), completely work-free. This is a true energy amplification process, not only permitted but prescribed by thermodynamics and even by the hoary old CEM/EE model. Note the important ingredient: the magnitude of the “collected energy” has been freely increased, but the form of the energy has remained the same and has not been changed.

E.g., if we multiply the applied voltage V by 100, with charges pinned, then the potential energy “collected” on those charges q is now Vq (new) = 100 x (Vq initial). All this without doing or requiring any work at all. And then by releasing the pinned charges so current can flow again, we can get much more work in the actual circuit load than would have been done by the original lesser potentialization. Work is the change of form of energy, not the change of magnitude of energy when it remains in the same form.

So one “free energy” method is the following: First, arrange a circuit so that one potentializes it in “static” (charges temporarily pinned) mode, drawing no current at all from the source and therefore doing no work – but nevertheless freely changing the magnitude of the collected potential energy in the circuit. Then with the charges still pinned, the primary source of potential is switched away, and that gap in the external circuit is re-completed (as, e.g., by adding a resistor and diode in series). This removes any possibility of the now-potentialized circuit being able to do work back inside the original source’s dipolarity, to destroy that primary source dipolarity.

But it leaves a now-separate external circuit that has been freely potentialized with real, usable excess EM energy. Then when the charges are unpinned in this external circuit, that circuit will dissipate its collected potential energy in normal fashion. It will thus deliver some free power in the load, while also destroying itself (its own dipolarity) because of this external circuit’s self-enforced Lorentz symmetry. But then the cycle can be iterated again and again, and the “source” is not being depleted, even though it is furnishing more and more energy to the external circuit once pinned and attached. All that the operator need furnish is (1) a pinning mechanism that lasts long enough for the potentializing and switching operations to be done, and (2) a built-in timing or mechanism that releases the pinning so that the separated but potentialized external circuit can dissipate its energy to give some powering of the load.

In short, potentialize the external circuit statically, separate the statically potentialized circuit from the original source, then dissipate the freely collected potential energy in the now-separated circuit. This is one theoretical method of achieving an overunity COP Maxwellian electrical power system, while complying with conservation of energy, the laws of thermodynamics, and the laws of physics. Note, however, that we have employed an asymmetrical Maxwellian system. The standard electrical engineering model advances only symmetrical Maxwellian systems – since Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all the asymmetrical Maxwellian systems in 1892, and our universities still use that mutilated old model.

As Feynman points out in his 1964 three volumes of physics, there are no EM force fields in mass-free space. The CEM/EE model when put together in the 1880s and 1890s, assumed a thin material ether filling all space. Hence to the formative scientists back then, there was not a single point in the entire universe where mass was totally absent. Hence (to them) there were indeed “force fields in space”, i.e., in the “material ether”.

When the material ether concept was destroyed in the latter 1880s, not a single CEM/EE equation was ever changed to eliminate those erroneously assumed EM force fields in space. That glaring error – that EM force fields do exist in massless space – continues to be taught in every EE department, and by every EE textbook.

But the destruction of the material ether in the 1880s freed scientific thinking to reflect on the properties of “massless space” itself – and Einstein gave us special relativity and then general relativity. A curved spacetime, e.g., “has energy” but no force and no “work”. But when a curvature of spacetime interacts with matter (such as charged matter in electrodynamics), it produces real EM forces and real work in the material charged particle system.

Feynman also pointed out his frustration that "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 4-2].

But relativistically, we may define “energy” as any change in the condition of massless spacetime itself. In that case, the ongoing interaction of energy with mass is necessary in order to generate a force to be accomplished. Force exists only in and on matter being interacted by a change in spacetime curvature or twisting, never in empty space. This agrees with Feynman’s observations. Again quoting Feynman:

"…in dealing with force the tacit assumption is always made that the force is equal to zero unless some physical body is present… One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin…" [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2].

"…the existence of the positive charge, in some sense, distorts, or creates a "condition" in space, so that when we put the negative charge in, it feels a force. This potentiality for producing a force is called an electric field." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 2-4].

"We may think of E(x, y, z, t) and B(x, y, z, t) as giving the forces that would be experienced at the time t by a charge located at (x, y, z), with the condition that placing the charge there did not disturb the positions or motion of all the other charges responsible for the fields." [ibid, vol. II, p. 1-3.]

"One of the most important characteristics of force is that it has a material origin, and this is not just a definition. … If you insist upon a precise definition of force, you will never get it!" [ibid., Vol. 1, 1964, p. 12-2]. Here Feynman is pointing out that force is not a “separate thing”, but an ongoing dynamic function. He also despaired of any precise definition of force itself. And without a definition of energy, he is correct in that force cannot be defined.

Let us call “energy”, then, the curvature or twisting or change in spacetime, which also implies an appropriate simultaneous change in the virtual particle flux of vacuum. There is no force involved in this definition, since there is no mass involved in it.

Let us call this “massless and force-free energy” the precursor energy – i.e., the precursor energy (of space itself) for what has been called “kinetic energy” and “static energy” of an object (mass) or a material system. In short, the “collected energy of the mass or charge” is determined by its ongoing interaction with its precursor field – its ongoing interaction with curved or distorted spacetime, which is also its interaction with the altered virtual particle flux of the vacuum.

In this way, we can now precisely define force: Force is the effect upon a material system of the ongoing interaction between the precursor energy of the local altered spacetime and the matter of that material system. Electromagnetic force then becomes the effect upon a charged matter system of the ongoing interaction between the precursor energy (of massless spacetime) and the charged matter of that system.

So “precursor energy” is very like (and may be exactly) what “information” energy ultimately is in the Bohm hidden variable theory. But it is directly connected to CEM/EE and real circuits and systems, by the ongoing interaction between precursor fields and the matter of that system.

Correcting the falsity of “force fields in space” in the CEM/EE model leads us directly into Bohm’s “information” approach and his hidden variable theory.

This happened in the “superweapons” developments of several nations (such as Russia, Brazil, Israel etc.) when scientists in these nations secretly corrected the sad old 1880s CEM/EE model, and the even-older mechanics theory, and progressed to a precursor fields model (in one form or another). In Russia this superweapons science and engineering (precursor engineering) area is called “energetics”, and its weaponization aspects are still highly classified. They are also tightly controlled by the KGB/FSB itself (including the superweapons themselves, which are not in the regular Russian armed forces, but are possessed and operated by special troops maintained and controlled by the KGB/FSB. In that fashion, the KGB/FSB retains its iron grip on, and control of, Russia itself).

As you can see, once one has progressed to “precursor” science (and to its engineering, then as the precursor technology is developed), one has already progressed into the very thing that Bohm’s hidden variable theory deals with. One has directly entered the practical science and engineering of Bohm’s hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics. And so one of the entities one meets in precursor science is Bohm’s quantum potential, the “separate nonlocalized precursor or information” effect shown in Bohm’s theory.

This should not be too surprising, after all. In classical electrodynamics, infinite speed of the scalar potential is already known under certain conditions. E.g., quoting Jackson:

"...[In the Coulomb gauge] the scalar potential 'propagates' instantly everywhere in space. The vector potential, on the other hand, satisfies the wave equation ... with its implied finite speed of propagation c. … "...the transverse current ... extends over all space, even if J is localized." [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975, p. 223].

Let us call a specific set of forces (and their dynamics) in matter -- which generate some specifically designed action or set of actions (effects) in that material system – an engine or a force engine. We are merely recognizing that a specific dynamics (effect) in a material system involves a specific force engine (direct cause). But now this force engine is further comprised of a precursor engine (energy engine or “information” engine) in ongoing interaction with the matter in that system.

So we can start with a tiny little force engine adjusted to give us the proper ongoing precursor engine we desire. Then we can directly amplify that precursor energy engine “for free” (i.e., work-free), so that a precursor engine of great magnitude is generated. Then that very large precursor engine, interacting with a distant mass system, will produce in that system the exact but giant force engine we originally started with as our “template”. In military terms, this is a “force amplifier” of great portent.

We can even “phase conjugate” that basic little precursor engine, and get a precursor engine for exactly the opposite effect in targeted matter (i.e., we can get a precise “precursor antiengine). This is very important in curing diseases. Given a sampling “precursor engine” for the physical disease engine, one can phase conjugate and amplify the basic “disease precursor engine” to generate a direct precursor antiengine to cure that specific disease or condition. Or, if one goes the other way (to make weapons rather than heal) and does not phase conjugate the disease engine, one can make a very powerful, amplified “precursor disease engine” and use it to generate specific diseases in targeted biological systems – such as in humans.

The decades-long microwave radiation of the U.S. Embassy in the Soviet Union was specifically a demonstration of that “disease induction” precursor engineering, to see if our Western scientists had any notion of what was happening. They didn’t, since standard electrical engineers from Johns Hopkins were sent in to “evaluate” the situation. And their very good “normal electrical engineering” examination of the “microwave radiation” showed an interesting thing: All the induced diseases and health changes occurred in force-field-free areas of the Embassy. That is, in those areas where the potentials were “steady” and had no dynamic changes. That is, in the precursor field regions of the Embassy!

In short, it demonstrated that the “static or steady potentials” had had induced in their internal Whittaker structuring the necessary “precursor engines” for the specific diseases and health changes induced in the charged matter of interacting bodies in those areas.

This was a deliberate intelligence probe, on a very high level target, to positively ascertain whether or not our own scientists understood precursor engineering. Our response actions then told the KGB with 100% certainty that we had no knowledge of such things.

The several nations who were into the superweapons development area early-on, and therefore passed beyond the old CEM/EE model and into the “precursor science and engineering” area, were naturally impelled into Bohm’s hidden variables theoretical approach. This meant that those nations developed quantum potential usage and weapons as a natural progression of the developing precursor engineering technology.

Now that nonlocal effects have been quite well-established in modern physics, we are indeed faced with the fact that precursor “information” is a universal connection capability, so that – to express it crudely – there is zero “signal distance travel time in space” between any two entities or points (or any number of widely separated entities or points) interconnected by a quantum potential. To the quantum potential weapon user, the distant stars are just as close as a millimeter from his laboratory QP weapon apparatus. Intervening mass (such as the ocean or the earth or sun) is no barrier, for the “information signal” does not “travel through” the intervening space.

Today, the QP weapons possessed by several nations are the most powerful weapons on earth. This is highly significant since, with precursor engineering and by a very small investment in switching and control, one can establish and control extraordinarily powerful and instantaneous distant effects. Hence if one works with the precursor energy, one can produce extraordinarily powerful effects, including at a distance, limited only by the state of development of the technology.

The major “tricks” in QP engineering development are to be able to establish a QP at will between two or more separated objects, or the entire class of a certain kind of objects, or to just one object, etc. Solutions to those areas are what determine the progress of QP weapons technology.

But the QP-Bohm technology can also be used to produce desired tiny effects at a distance. One does not always seek to sudden vaporize an entire city, but may wish to do a very simple and small – but strategically important – thing. Blocking the success of emerging overunity CEM/EE power systems is of just such strategic importance to those determined to evoke a catastrophic economic collapse of the United States (and Western Europe) due to the escalating energy-from-fuel crisis.

E.g., capture the precursor engine for the basic operational effect (the Aharonov-Bohm localization of the magnetic B-field in the core) of a MEG. Then, when the MEG group is to have a critical demonstration for potential financial backers, simply insert the phase conjugate of that AB precursor engine. Remember, there is zero spatial and time distance between the inserting lab device and the distant MEG, since with the QP connection the two exist in a multiply-connected spacetime. This insertion of the AB precursor anti-engine directly negates the operating AB precursor engine in the MEG itself, causing the unit to lapse back into a normal transformer. And no electrical engineer will even begin to recognize what is actually wrong or what has happened. The unit just simply does not work to produce overunity in the demonstration. In short, just nullify its precursor engine, and it will fail to meet its overunity test. Yet later, once the offending “precursor antiengine” is removed, the same MEG unit will operate normally again, as if nothing had happened. And no amount of normal electrical testing and checking can come up with the “cause of the failure”.

This is the type of effect that is apparently being set up to use against leading overunity energy systems and inventors, to guarantee their failure during critical demonstrations, and thus to guarantee that they are not funded and their systems never get finished and never reach the market.

This, in turn, will result in us continuing under the onslaught of the ever-increasing energy-from-fuel crisis, caused by the escalating fuel crisis. If this present MidEast war expands dramatically (and one suspects it will), then the oil supplies from most of the MidEast may well be substantially disrupted. And this at a time when we have difficulties elsewhere (Venezuela, some in Mexico, squeeze-down of the Iraqi oil, etc.) and a 400,000 barrel shortage caused by shutdown of the Prudhoe field in Alaska plus our own energy shortages remaining from Hurricane Katrina.

In short, the QP weapons will almost certainly be very gingerly used by the High Cabal to stop the leading U.S. and European overunity systems from being funded and developed in time to prevent economic collapse of the United States. With a major disruption of MidEast oil, etc., then the catastrophic economic collapse of the United States (and Western Europe) is assured. In the face of that giant chaos, our own strategic destruction is also assured. [Unless we are willing to take the appropriate steps and act right now by developing these Overunity Asymmetric Systems right now].

So somehow, we have to overcome that terrible mindset and blockage in our entire scientific community, and get some funds released to fund some sharp young doctoral candidates, post doctoral scientists, and a few sharp young physics professors in this area. If that can be made to happen, then in three years there will never again be an energy problem, anywhere on earth.

I’ve laid out the gist of a conceptual theory of energy from the vacuum that has been fitted to actual working machines by my work with several inventors and groups. My job was always to examine the weird phenomenology these inventors would finally obtain, and then find in physics where that sort of thing had been encountered. EEs, e.g., know nothing about negative EM energy (called “dark energy” by our astrophysicists and avidly sought in their telescopes). Well, one can directly evoke both “dark matter” (negative mass energy electrons – simply empty Dirac Sea holes, which ARE NOT positrons!) and “dark energy” in circuits on the bench, and examine their strange phenomenology. Dark energy is simply the negative energy in the negative-energy EM fields produced at light speed by such Dirac Sea holes (negative mass-energy electrons), once they are formed.

To produce dark matter and dark energy simply requires very sharp energy gradients across a small region of spacetime. This causes a known surge of electrons lifted from the Dirac Sea (usually called the “Lenz law effect”), but it also causes an unknown surge of the holes (negative mass-energy Dirac electrons) in the other directions, which are spewing out negative energy fields at light speed. Bedini’s patented battery charging processes (and his Bedini-Cole motor now causing such a furor on the web because of its replication) use such processes, and he has been using them for at least 20 years.

The now-little-known but famous “Kron negative resistor” produced at Stanford University in the 1930s by the great Gabriel Kron, under a U.S. Navy contract, was a negative EM energy effect. A direct offshoot of it (a derivative) was Sweet’s vacuum triode amplifier, which placed the barium nuclei in a barium ferrite magnet into self-oscillation, thereby creating sustained self-oscillation in the powerful fields of negative energy that bind the nucleons together. He was a protégée of Gabriel Kron, who is the mentor who had Sweet sent to MIT for his MS in Electrical Engineering during WW II. Sweet’s device was a negative energy output device, which produced a nominal 500 watts negative energy output at a COP = 1,500,000. By pushing the device (simply by adding more load, due to the nature of the action of negative energy) and doubling its output, it would reduce its own weight on the bench by 90%. I designed the experiment that did that. Sweet later pushed it even further (which was very dangerous) and levitated the device on a string tied to a bedpost. He also was able (by tilting properly) to cause it to generate forward or reverse “thrust” as well.

Shortly thereafter, an attempt was made on Sweet’s life by an assassin firing a silenced rifle from about 200 yards. Sweet was aged and feeble, and as fate would have it, he caught his toe coming up the steps to his apartment building, and fell sprawling. Just as his head moved forward in the fall, the bullet snapped right by his ear. Thereafter he was continually threatened, followed, harassed by phone calls all during the night, etc. It so frightened him that he would never again demonstrate the successful antigravity experiment or even discuss it with his backers.

As you can see