PesWiki.com

Menu

PowerPedia:the mistery on the Andrea Rossi's catalyzer

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:38 pm.

  • One error has been found on this page. Administrator will correct this soon.
  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Andrea Rossi promissed to publish in June a paper by W. Guglinski in his blog Journal of Nuclear Physics.

However Rossi did not fulfill his promise.

See what happened ahead

THE MISTERY OF ANDREA ROSSI'S CATALYZER

W. GUGLINSKI writes:

In March-2011 my article Introduction to quantum ring theory was published in the Andrea Rossi's blog: the Journal of Nuclear Physics.

In February-2011 I had also submitted other two papers. They are:

1- How Repulsive Gravity Contributes for Rossi-Focardi Cold Fusion Experiment

2- Anomalous Mass of the Neutron

In the paper on the Rossi-Focardi experiment, it's suggested what should be the best element to be used as a catalyzer in the E-Cat, according to the new nuclear model proposed in Quantum Ring Theory.

Andrea Rossi replied the following to my email:

---------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:28:18 +0100

From: info@leonardocorp1996.com

To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

CC: info@dpinformatica.it

Subject: Re: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Thank you very much, this is gonna be published together with the former one.

Warmest regards,

Andrea

-----------------------------------------------------

However, the two papers were not published in March as he promissed, and then I sent to Andrea an email. Ahead are the emails we exchanged:

-----------------------------------------------

From: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

To: info@leonardocorp1996.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:48:39 -0300

Hi, Dr. Rossi,

Two months ago I sent you two papers:

- How Repulsive Gravity Contributes for Rossi-Focardi Cold Fusion Experiment

- Anomalous Mass of the Neutron

Did you give up to publish then in your Journal of Nuclear Physics?

Regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:58:57 +0200

From: info@leonardocorp1996.com

To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Dear Wladimir:

They will be published, but we have a long list...by the way: send them to me again, I will make personally the reviewingto save time.

Warmest regards,

Andrea

---------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

To: info@leonardocorp1996.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:53:37 -0300

Dear Dr. Rossi,

I am sending again the two papers (attached):

- How repulsive gravity contributes for cold fusion occurrence in Rossi-Focardi experiment

- Anomalous mass of the neutron

Regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:41:09 +0200

From: info@leonardocorp1996.com

To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Dear Wladimir:

Your article about the ORT has been published two months ago.

Can you explain which are the substantial differences?

Warm regards,

Andrea Rossi

----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

To: info@leonardocorp1996.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:33:00 -0300

Dear Dr. Rossi

that article about QRT is only a brief introduction to the theory.

QRT proposes several models, as for the photon, the hydrogen atom, the neutron, the nucleus, etc.

But in that article published in your blog I did not address some specific cold fusion mechanisms.

Cold fusion requires a model of neutron n=p+e. Quantum physicists do not accept the model n=p+e because of some theoretical restrictions against such model.

- The article ANOMALOUS MASS OF THE NEUTRON shows that all the theorectical restrictions against the model n=p+e can be eliminated, by considering a model of electron which moves with helical trajectory.

- The article How repulsive gravity contributes for cold fusion occurrence in Rossi-Focardi experiment shows that gravity has the magnitude of the electromagnetism, and so gravity contributes for the cold fusion occurrence.

I think these two papers are very important for the understanding of cold fusion mechanisms

Regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:51:32 +0200

From: info@leonardocorp1996.com

To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

Subject: RE: Rossi-Focardi cold fusion explained by QRT

OK: in June both papers will be published,

Warmest regards,

Andrea

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the begginning of June, somebody had posted a comment in the article A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni [www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com] , by prof. Christos Stremmenos.

The author of the comment told that there is a researcher (I dont remember his name) who is proposing that a kind of anomalous gravity can be responsible for some of the phenomena that current theories of Physics cannot explain.

And he asked to Andrea Rossi if he already had thought on the possibility of anomalous gravity can be influencing in cold fusion occurrence.

Well, of course I immediatelly realized that my paper (where I show how repulsive gravity can contribute for cold fusion) would be of the interest of that person, and also many people would be interested to read it.

Then I posted a comment in Andrea Rossi's blog, asking him which of the two papers of mine would be published firstly. I recommend to Andrea to publish firstly the paper How Repulsive Gravity Contributes for cold fusion in Rossi-Focardi Experiment.

Andrea Rossi posted a reply in his blog saying the following:

"Both will be published"

But Andrea Rossi changed his decision...

Misteriously, he decided do not publish my papers.

And so that to eliminate the proof that he had lied, he deleted from his blog that post of mine (where I asked him what paper he would publish firstly). And he deleted his reply to me too.

In the upcoming years, Andrea Rossi will be one the most powerful man in our planet. His E-Cat will change the world. Thanks to his invention, he will enter the pages of the mankind history.

So, why does Andrea Rossi needs to lie ?

Perhaps you can think:

"Well, dear Guglinski, in your paper you have suggested what is the best element to be the catalyzer for the E-Cat. And since Andrea Rossi keeps it as a secret. Then, if the element you had suggested is that used by Andrea Rossi in his E-Cat, that's why he decided do not publish your paper".

I dont think so. I suggested one element. However, probably the catalyzer is a mixture of some elements (and I think carbon is one of them, beyond that suggested in my paper). And so there is need to know what is the correct percentage of each of the elements.

I think the reason is other. Let me tell what I think.

Any acceptable theory for explaining cold fusion must be able to give the response for this fundamental question: how can a particle to surpass the Coulombic barrier?

Among all the theories proposed, no one of them is able to give the response.

As known, Andrea Rossi claims that he has a theory capable to explain his cold fusion experiment, and he states that there is no need a New Physics.

However, no matter what theory he has, his theory must be able to explain this fact: how is the Coulombic overcome ?

By reading my paper, Andrea Rossi has realized that my hypothesis of gravity with the magnitude of electromagnetism is a good idea, and it can solve the question on how the nucleons surpass the Coulombic barrier.

Therefore, my theory can be the unique capable to explain cold fusion. And more: my hypothesis of gravity with the magnitude of the electromagnetism cannot be stolen. There is no way other theorists to make a plagiarism.

Because such hypothesis can be justified only by taking in consideration the models proposed in Quantum Ring Theory. For instance, there is need a repulsive gravity working into the photon model of QRT, otherwise the model collapses. Repulsive gravity also must be considered in my new nuclear model, in order to distribute symmetrically the Dirac strings in the nuclei.

On another hand, as there is not any theory capable to solve the question on how the Coulombic barrier is surpassed, all the cold fusion theorists can continue their theoretical work, trying to get the solution by proposing a new theory.

So, actually the cold fusion theorists want the following: that cold fusion continues without theoretical explanation.

By this way, they can continue in their attempt. And time from time one of them will be considered to have the best theory, and so he gets his 15 minutes of fame.

While there is no answer for the question of the Coulombic barrier, the theorists can continue with their attempts.

That's why a new fundamental idea (as the gravity with the magnitude of electromagnetism) is not wellcome. It breaks the dream of each theorist to become the discoverer of the solution for the mistery of cold fusion occurrence.

Why did Andrea Rossi decide do not publish the paper ?

So, in May-2011 Andrea Rossi had promissed to Guglinski to publish, in June 2011, his paper How repulsive gravity contributes for cold fusion in Rossi-Focardi experiment, in Rossi's blog Journal of Nuclear Physics.

Misteriously, Rossi did not fulfill his promise. He changed his mind, and did not publish the paper.

Why did he decide do not publish the paper ?

There are the following possibilities:

1- In his paper Guglinski predicted correctly the element used in Rossi's catalyzer. So, Andrea Rossi cannot publish the paper, because it reveals the secret of his catalyzer.

2-Andrea Rossi recognized that Guglinski's proposal on the gravity with the same magnitude of electromagnetism solves the greatest unsolved mistery of cold fussion: how the Coulombic barrier is surpassed. And as Andrea Rossi has his own theory for explaining cold fusion, he does not want Guglinski's idea spread worldwide

See also

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1]

To be published soon, with the permission of Andrea Rossi.

------------------------------------------

From: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

To: info@leonardocorp1996.com

Subject: I will publish my paper in PESWIKI

Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:50:05 -0300

Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,

as you decided do not publish in your blog my paper How repulsive gravity contributes for cold fusion in Rossi-Focardi experiment, then I will publish it in the Peswiki website.

I think its publication in Peswiki will not cause any inconvenience to you.

Regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

-------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Andrea Rossi

July 15th, 2011 at 7:19 AM

Dear Wladimir Guglinski:

We have your paper in the list of articles to be published, it is just in line. Of course you can publish it where you want, can we publish it all the same when we will be ready, or you gave the copyright?

We need again your authorization to publish.

Warm Regards,

A.R.

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=462&cpage=1#comment-53101

-------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Wladimir Guglinski

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

July 15th, 2011 at 9:49 AM

Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi

I did not give the copyright to Peswiki.

I give my authorization to publish my paper ”How repulsive gravity contributes for cold fusion in Rossi-Focardi experiment” in the Journal of Nuclear Physics.

Regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------

Andrea Rossi

July 15th, 2011 at 10:17 AM

Dear Wladimir Guglinski,

Thank you very much, I read your paper and is very interesting, as well as all your work. I just can’t push, but we will publish it.

Warm Regards,

Andrea

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=462#comments

--------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------

Wladimir Guglinski

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

July 16th, 2011 at 8:10 AM

Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi

in my paper it’s suggested the element to be the best catalyzer for your E-Cat.

In the case the element suggested by my paper is the most important element used as catalyzer in your E-Cat, you can publish the paper with the following note:

NOTE of the editor:

Guglinski’s paper suggests correctly the principal element used as catalyzer in the E-Cat.

However, as Andrea Rossi did not get yet the patent for the E-Cat in USA, the element will not be revealed in the paper here published.

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

Andrea Rossi

July 16th, 2011 at 9:13 AM

Dear Wladimir Guglinski,

You are very good in this science and I am sure you are making very good things. I am sure you are among those who are or will be able to replicate my effect studying the patent.

Warmest Regards, my friend. And a hug to Brazil!

A.R.

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

Wladimir Guglinski

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

July 17th, 2011 at 7:46 PM

Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi

So, it seems my paper suggests the correct element used in your E-Cat.

Therefore, my paper cannot be published in your journal.

At least not before you get the patent from USA.

I will NOT publish my paper in PESWIKI. I will wait you get the patent.

Best wishes,

regards

WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=462&cpage=1#comment-53878

-------------------------------------------

'''The comment was not approved in Rossi's blog.

He sent the following email to Guglinski:'''

--------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:29:07 +0200

From: info@leonardocorp1996.com

To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com

Subject: Andrea Rossi

Dear Wladimir:

Smart Persons don't need too many words:

Thank you,

Warm regards,

Andrea Rossi

---------------------------------------------

Comments