PesWiki.com

Menu

PowerPedia:Energy Catalyzer

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:02 pm.

  • 82 errors has been found on this page. Administrator will correct this soon.
  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

This page is a copy of the page at There was an error working with the wiki: Code[46], which is up for deletion, as of November 1, 2011. "This is another free energy scam with a lot of self-promotional publicity but no science behind it." See our directory page here at Directory:Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator (E-Cat)

: I should say that it does not surprise me at all that Wikipedia would put this article on the chopping block. They are very mainstream and won't touch anything that is cutting edge, and especially not something that is bleeding edge.

: When I first found out about Wikipedia back in December 2004, I was really excited and began posting content there. Every page I posted was deleted for being too "unsubstantiated," even when I was quoting original sources. They wanted a citation from the New York Times.

: That is what spurred me to commenced PESWiki in August 2005, when I found a couple of guys at the TeslaTech conference who knew how to do it.

: What I think of when I think of Wikipedia is a commercial pen crammed full of domesticated turkeys who have never know life in the wild, and whose existence is for one purpose: getting fattened for slaughter. Not only are we wild here are PESWiki, but we are like eagles in comparison to the turkeys of Wikipedia. Trying to reason with someone at Wikipedia is a waste of time. They are a bunch of slaves to the powers that be, and they can't comprehend the freedom we enjoy here.

: Now, here's something interesting. Check out their traffic over the past year: http://www.quantcast.com/wikipedia.org It is down by 13% while ours is holding steady: http://www.quantcast.com/peswiki.com Gratefully, the mainstream is loosing ground. People are going where the action and life is. -- SilverThunder 10:09, 1 November 2011 (PDT)

If Wikipedia does delete that page, then we can clean up the content down below so it reads well. We have an older version of the Mediawiki software, and I guess the references are not set up the same way.

----------------

The Energy Catalyzer (sometimes shortened to E-Cat) is an apparatus built by inventorThere was an error working with the wiki: Code[33] processo ed apparecchiatura per ottenere reazioni esotermiche, in particolare da nickel ed idrogeno. [process and equipment to obtain exothermal reactions, in particular from nickel and hydrogen], Patent Number 0001387256, Deposited 9 April 2008, Issued 6 April 2011, Inventor: Andrea Rossi. There was an error working with the wiki: Code[34],Cold Fusion: “You have to embrace this”, Mats Lewan, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[47], February 23, 2011 with support from his scientific consultant, physicist and There was an error working with the wiki: Code[48] professordf.unibo.it, Dipartimento di Fisica, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[49], Professori emeriti There was an error working with the wiki: Code[50]. The 2008International Application No. PCT/IT2008/000532, International Filing Date: 04.08.2008 patent applicationThere was an error working with the wiki: Code[1] claims "a method and apparatus for carrying out There was an error working with the wiki: Code[51] and Hydrogen exothermal reactions," with production of There was an error working with the wiki: Code[52].{{cite web

|author=S. Focardi A. Rossi |title=A new energy source from nuclear fusion |date=2010-03-22 |publisher=There was an error working with the wiki: Code[35],There was an error working with the wiki: Code[2] one statement by Rossi asserted that it is not cold fusion, but rather There was an error working with the wiki: Code[53], Low-Energy Nuclear React

ion.{{cite web

|author=A. Rossi |title=Energy catalyzer: it works and it's not fusion |date=2011-01-31 |publisher=New Energy Times |url=http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/3626-energycatalyzer.shtml}} Claims of a similar system, but yielding considerably less power, had previously been advanced by Focardi et al.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[3] According to Focardi, "the hydrogen is heated at a given temperature with a simple There was an error working with the wiki: Code[36]. When the ignition temperature is reached, the energy production process starts: the hydrogen atoms penetrate into the nickel and transform it into copper.”There was an error working with the wiki: Code[4]

The device has been demonstrated to an invited audience several times, and has been commented on positively by Bologna physics professor Giuseppe Levi.Low Energy Nuclear Revolution - full reportage on the E-Cat. Giuseppe Levi: "At the present time, on the basis of the current experiments, I'm sufficiently certain about what we witnessed, and I can say that both in December and January energy was produced with power on the order of around 10 kilowatts. We also ran another test, a "tecnical" and "private" one - these technical tests are necessary to enable us to understand how to set up the final test - and this was a long test, lasting about 18 hours, in which the minumum power produced was on the order of 15kW - this is extremely conservative data." The international patent application received an unfavorable There was an error working with the wiki: Code[37] because it seemed to "offend against the generally accepted laws of physics and established theories" and to overcome this problem the application should have contained either experimental evidence or a firm theoretical basis in current scientific theories.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[5] Due to this secrecy, journalists were not allowed to examine the core of the reactor, and there is still uncertainty about the viability of the invention.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[6] Mark Gibbs of There was an error working with the wiki: Code[54] commented: "until a verifiably objective analysis is conducted by an independent third party that confirms the results match the claims there’s no real news".{{cite web

|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/30/believing-in-cold-fusion-and-the-e-cat/

|author=Mark Gibbs

|date=October 30, 2011

|title=Believing in Cold Fusion and the E-Cat

|publisher=There was an error working with the wiki: Code[55]

}}

Demonstrations and investigations

The device has not yet been independently verified. Several demonstrations were given to invited guests. In January and February two demonstrations were given in the presence of Levi.{{cite web

|url=http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3081694.ece

|title=Cold fusion: Observing researcher wants more tests

|author=Mats Lewan

|date=February 2, 2011

|publisher=Ny Teknik

|accessdate=May 21, 2011

}}{{cite news

|last=Lewan |first=Mats |title=Report #3: Scientific Analysis of Rossi, Focardi and Levi Claims

|url=http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece |title=Cold Fusion: 18 hour test excludes combustion |work=Ny Teknik

|date=February 23, 2011

}} In March two Swedish scientists witnessed a demonstration.Interview with Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén (Swedish w. English subtitles). Youtube.com (2001-05-09). Retrieved on 2011-07-10.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[7] In April some representatives from the press were invited,La magia del signor Rossi, Angelo Saso, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[38] and There was an error working with the wiki: Code[39]. None of these were set up to provide scientific evidence.

January to April demonstrations

Held in Bologna, January 14, 2011, the demonstration was monitored by independent scientific representatives of the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[56], including a researcher in physics, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[57]. Levi concluded that the power and energy produced was "impressive," and that the Energy Catalyzer might be working as a new type of energy source. There was an error working with the wiki: Code[58], a Swedish technology magazine, reported that editorial staff were polled on their reaction to this report. "The result: two-thirds do not believe in it." Of this demonstration, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[59] analyst There was an error working with the wiki: Code[60] wrote that "If this all sounds fishy to you, it should,"{{cite web

|url=http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-italian-scientists-cold-fusion-video.html

|title=Italian scientists claim to have demonstrated cold fusion (w/ Video)

|author=Lisa Zyga |date=Jan 20, 2011

|publisher=physorg.com |accessdate=May 21, 2011

}} and that "In many ways cold fusion is similar to perpetual motion machines. The principles defy the laws of physics, but that doesn’t stop people from periodically claiming to have invented or discovered one."{{cite web

|url=http://news.discovery.com/tech/cold-fusion-claims-resurface.html

|title=Cold fusion: Cold Fusion Claims Resurface |author=Benjamin Radford

|date=Jan 21, 2011

|publisher=Discovery.com

|accessdate=May 21, 2011

}}

Nonetheless, Levi in an interview with Ny Teknik, stated “What has impressed me, and what sets this work apart from everything I’ve ever seen, is that we have 10&nbspkW of measured energy output, and this output is completely repeatable. But what I want to do now is an experiment with continuous operation for at least one or more days. Since there are very specific limits on how much energy you can generate from a given amount of mass, I can thus rule out a chemical reaction as the energy source.”

Another test, lasting 18 hours, was performed in Bologna, from February 10–11, 2011, by Levi and Rossi, but was not conducted in public.{{cite news

|last=Lewan |first=Mats |title=Report #3: Scientific Analysis of Rossi, Focardi and Levi Claims

|url=http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece |title=Cold Fusion: 18 hour test excludes combustion |work=Ny Teknik

|date=February 23, 2011

}}

According to Levi, the process was 'ignited' by 1,250&nbspwatts for five to ten minutes, and power was then reduced to 80&nbspwatts (for the control electronics). Cooling was supplied by tap water and flow volume was monitored. As reported by Ny Teknik, "Initially, the temperature of the inflowing water was 7 degrees Celsius and for a while the outlet temperature was 40 degrees Celsius. A flow rate of about one liter per second, equates to a peak power of 130&nbspkilowatts. The power output was later stabilized at 15 to 20&nbspkilowatts." Levi calculated consumption of hydrogen at 0.4&nbspgrams. “In my opinion, all chemical sources are now excluded,” he told Ny Teknik.

On March 29, 2011 two Swedish physicists, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[40], Professor Emeritus at There was an error working with the wiki: Code[61] and also chairman of the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[62]’ Energy Committee, participated as observers in a test of a smaller version of the Energy Catalyzer. The test ran for six hours, power output was estimated at 4.4 kW, and total energy produced at about 25 kWh. Essen and Kullander reported, "Any chemical process should be ruled out for producing 25 kWh from whatever is in a 50 cubic centimeter container. The only alternative explanation is that there is some kind of a nuclear process that gives rise to the measured energy production."There was an error working with the wiki: Code[8] In a later conversation, a few months after the test, Essén stated "I want to wait for more facts. The facts I know add up to make this interesting and worth pursuing, but I am still very uncertain about this."There was an error working with the wiki: Code[9]

They were given samples of nickel powder, some unused and some that Rossi reported as used for 2.5 months analysis showed the unused powder was pure nickel while the used powder contained 10 percent copper and 11 percent iron, although iron production is not mentioned anywhere in the patent.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[10] In their test report, Essen and Kullander cautioned, "Since we do not have access to the internal design of the central fuel container and no information on the external lead shielding and the cooling water system we can only make very general comments."

On April 19{{cite news

|last=Lewan |first=Mats |url=http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3166567.ece/BINARY/Report+test+of+E-cat+19+April+2011.pdf

|work=Ny Teknik |date=April 19, 2011|title=Test of Energy Catalyzer (April 19)

}} and April 28There was an error working with the wiki: Code[11] two more demonstrations were held. The first of them was also covered by the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[41] 24-hour There was an error working with the wiki: Code[42] the Ammeter, measured the water flow by weighing and calibrated the temperature-sensor probe to confirm that all water is converted to steam.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[12] There was an error working with the wiki: Code[13] The measurements showed a net power of between 2.3 and 2.6&nbspkilowatts. The input power was 300&nbspwatts.

<pesn type=
"></pesn>

On September 7, reporter Mats Lewan from Ny Teknik witnessed a further demonstration in which the Energy Catalyzer was first operated for 90 minutes with input power claimed to be around 2.6 kW after which it ran for 35 minutes with 25W input. The total output energy during the whole demonstration was claimed to have exceeded the electrical input energy. The Energy Catalyzer was a larger size than versions used in previous demonstrations. As reported this larger version will be used in the scheduled 1MW plant.Ny Teknik: See the E-cat run in self-sustained mode

<pesn type=
"></pesn>

On October 6, 2011, an E-cat was demonstrated, which reportedly lasted for about eight hours, it was claimed that for the first five hours the input power was up to 3kW, after which the power was reduced to 115W. The power output was claimed to be between two and three kilowatts. Possible uncertainties concerning the quality of the steam were said to have been overcome Fusione fredda: nuovo esperimento, "Questa incertezza si può considerare superata con l’esperimento di ieri." TRANSLATION: "This uncertainty can be considered overcome by means of the experiment of yesterday." by injecting the steam from the Energy Catalyzer into a heat exchanger, where a flow of water was heated, TV: New test of the E-cat enhances proof of heat, "The important new element in the test was that it was possible to bypass the controversial energy calculation, based on vaporization, by injecting the steam from the energy catalyzer into a heat exchanger, where a flow of water was heated." though the accuracy of measurements was reportedly fairly low.Test of Energy Catalyzer, Bologna October 6, 2011 Roland Pettersson, retired Associate Professor from the University of Uppsala, who witnessed it said "I'm convinced that this works, but there is still room for more measurements".There was an error working with the wiki: Code[16]

Bologna, October 28th 2011 Customer Acceptance Test

On October 28, 2011, a 1MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested, considered satisfactory and approved by engineer Domenico Fioravanti on behalf of an undisclosed customer intending to acquire the plant.Half a megawatt E-cat in Bologna - NyTeknik

Evaluation of the device

Rossi and Focardi's joint work was rejected by a peer-reviewed scientific journal,There was an error working with the wiki: Code[17] and appeared in Rossi's self-published blog, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[43].

With their report on the April demonstrations, Ny Teknik provided some analysis: According to Rossi, the heat is generated from an unknown reaction, which is, according to Essen and Kullander, probably nuclear. The concept of cold fusion, or low-energy nuclear reaction, has been mentioned, referring to a hypothesized reaction between hydrogen and nickel, producing copper. "Many physicists are skeptical," because fusion of nuclei requires very high temperatures, "according to current knowledge," and because "fusion should produce very high levels of gamma radiation."

Rossi states that the device probably works not due to "cold fusion", but due to weak interactions between nuclei, without actual fusion happening.

As Ny Teknik reports, Peter Ekström, lecturer at the Department of Nuclear Physics at Lund University in Sweden, concluded in May 2011, "I am convinced that the whole story is one big scam, and that it will be revealed in less than one year."Kall Fusion på italienska (Cold fusion - Italian style), Peter Ekström, Italian/English He cites the unlikelihood of a chemical reaction being strong enough to overcome the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[63], the lack of gamma rays, the lack of explanation for the origin of the extra energy, the lack of the expected radioactivity after fusing a proton with 58Ni, the unexplained occurrence of 11% iron in the spent fuel, the 10% copper in the spent fuel strangely having the same isotopic ratios as natural copper, and the lack of any unstable copper isotope in the spent fuel as if the reactor only produced stable isotopes. He later added in New Energy Times that the steam velocity in a videotaped test appears to be way too low for the reported energy production, and that some liquid water might be exiting the system via the drainage tube.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[18]

More cautious, Kjell Aleklett, physics professor at Uppsala University in Sweden, summarized in his blog: "What shall we do as scientists? Shall we say madness as many do today, or should we try to understand what is happening? I myself have nothing against to reveal a scam, or join in and verify something that no one could imagine. Both extremes belong to that which makes life as a researcher incredibly interesting." According to Aleklett, in a sample of spent fuel provided by the inventor, the percentage of copper was too high for any known reaction of nickel, and the copper had the same isotopic ratio as natural copper.Kjell Aleklett,. Aleklett.wordpress.com (2011-04-11). Retrieved on 2011-07-10.

On April 23, 2011, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[64] published an audio interviewThe Future of Energy: Part 1 Podcast approved Transcript with There was an error working with the wiki: Code[65], Chief Scientist at There was an error working with the wiki: Code[66] There was an error working with the wiki: Code[67] in There was an error working with the wiki: Code[68]. Bushnell described several emerging energy technologies, but he identified LENR as "the most interesting and promising at this point". He continued:

"... in January of this year Rossi, backed by Focardi, who had been working on this for many years, and in fact doing some of the best work worldwide, came out and did a demonstration first in January, they re-did it in February, they re-did it in March, where for days they had one of these cells, a small cell, producing in the 10 to 15 kilowatts range, which is far more than enough heat to boil water for tea. And so they say that this is weak interaction, this is not fusion. So I think we're almost over the We don’t understand it problem. I think we're almost over the This doesn't produce anything useful problem. And so I think this will go forward fairly rapidly now. And if it does, this is capable of, by itself, completely changing geo-economics, geo-politics and of solving climate and energy." Bushnell also said that they (Langley) were investigating and applying the Widom-Larsen theorySimplified Widom-Larsen theory.Widom-Larsen theory: Against. to an experiment.info.aiaa.org, Robert Moses, March 28, 2011 speaking at AIAA NASA researchers at the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[69] have offered to validate Rossi's device, if Rossi pays for the tests.

According to There was an error working with the wiki: Code[70], the demonstrations held from January to April 2011 had several flaws that make them lose credibility and Rossi has refused to perform several tests that could clarify dark points.Controversial energy-generating system lacking credibility (w/ video), physorg.com, Lisa Zyga, 11 August 2011

On October 7th, 2011, Italian scientific journalist Maurizio MelisMaurizio Melis is scientific journalist (Italian: "Maurizio Melis è giornalista scientifico") of There was an error working with the wiki: Code[71], who witnessed the demonstration in Bologna of the previous day, wrote: "in the coming weeks Rossi aims to activate a 1MW plant, which is now almost ready, and we had the opportunity to inspect it during the demonstration of yesterday. If the plant starts up then it will be very difficult to affirm that it is a hoax. Instead, we will be suddenly projected into a new energetic era." Fusione fredda: nuovo esperimento, "Rossi punta ad attivare nelle prossime settimane un impianto da 1 MW, che è ormai quasi completo e che ieri abbiamo avuto l’opportunità di visionare durante la dimostrazione. Se l’apparato funzionerà, sarà molto difficile sostenere che si tratta di un trucco, mentre ci troveremmo improvvisamente proiettati, dal punto di vista energetico, in una nuova era."TRANSLATION: "In the coming weeks Rossi aims to activate a 1MW plant, which is now almost ready, and we had the opportunity to inspect it during the demonstration of yesterday. If the plant starts up then it will be very difficult to affirm that it is a hoax. Instead, we will be suddenly projected into a new energetic era."

Patents

An application in 2008 to patent the device internationally had received an unfavorable There was an error working with the wiki: Code[44] at the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[72]International Preliminary Report on Patentability. Wipo.int. Retrieved on 2011-07-10. from the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[73], noting that the description of the device was based on "general statements and speculations" and citing "numerous deficiencies in both the description and in the evidence provided to support its feasibility" as well as incompatibilities with current scientific theories.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[19] The patent application was published on October 15, 2009.

However, on 6 April 2011 an application was approved by the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[45], which issued a patent for the invention, valid only in Italy.The patent granted 6 April, 2011, by the Ufficio Italiano Brevetti e Marchi. Retrieved on 2011-07-10.Rossi, Andrea. "Method and apparatus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen exothermal reactions" There was an error working with the wiki: Code[20] 2009-10-15There was an error working with the wiki: Code[21] Ny Teknik: Patent granted for the energy catalyzer. Nyteknik.se. Retrieved on 2011-07-10. International, European, and U.S. patent applications are still pending.

Commercial plans

Defkalion

In February 2011, Rossi announced an agreement with the newly formed Greek company There was an error working with the wiki: Code[74] as his first client.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[22]«???????» ????????-?????? ???? ?????. ??????????? ??? ??????. Xanthipress.gr. 12 March 2011. Retrieved on 2011-07-10. According to Rossi, the agreement called for delivery of a 1MW heating plant, consisting of 300 reactors of 4&nbspkW connected in series and parallel.

The plant which would supply heating for Defkalion's own purposes only, was intended to be inaugurated in October 2011. Rossi stated that he would not be paid by Defkalion until the installation was delivered and working.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[23] Defkalion’s spokesman Symeon Tsalikoglou confirmed the agreement, which gave exclusive rights for Defkalion to manufacture and sell the Energy Catalyzer throughout Greece.O ?????????? ??? ????????? Defcalion ???? ??? XanthiPress.gr. Xanthipress.gr. 16 March 2011. Retrieved on 2011-07-10.

In August 2011 Rossi announced that he had cancelled his contract with Defkalion, stating that none of E-Cat's technology had been transferred to them.There was an error working with the wiki: Code[24]There was an error working with the wiki: Code[25]There was an error working with the wiki: Code[26], Rossi's press releaseThere was an error working with the wiki: Code[27]There was an error working with the wiki: Code[28] confirmation via email from Defkalion to Ny Teknik Rossi said that "the issue [that caused the cancellation] is just financial, not personal, nor technological, nor scientific", and that he wouldn't comment further because he was preparing a lawsuit against Defkalion. A board member of Defkalion likewise indicated that the reasons for the cancellation were entirely financial.Comment by Prof Christos Stremmenos on the breach between Andrea Rossi and Defkalion. Sent to Daniele Passerini on August 8, 2011 in Italian Professor Christos Stremmenos, board member of Deflakion Rossi later confirmed this, specifying that Defkalion was unable to fulfil its contractual obligations in due time.

AmpEnergo

In May 2011, According to Ny Teknik, There was an error working with the wiki: Code[29]There was an error working with the wiki: Code[30]

Rossi reached an agreement, for an undisclosed sum, with AmpEnergo,AmpEnergo. AmpEnergo. Retrieved on 2011-07-10. an Ohio company,Ampenergo Certificate of Organization There was an error working with the wiki: Code[75], 20 April 2009, (via nyteknik.se) to receive royalties on sales of licenses and products built on the Energy Catalyzer in the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[76].E-Cat Commercialization in the Americas (Press Release) 27 June 2011. AmpEnergo. Retrieved on 2011-07-10. Three of the founders of AmpEnergo knew Rossi since 1996, through There was an error working with the wiki: Code[77],Leonardo Technologies, Inc., (company website) Retrieved on 2011-07-10. which Rossi co-founded, selling his interest in the late 1990s, and which has been working on a series of U.S. government construction engineering contracts.Leonardo Technologies, Inc. governmentcontractswon.com accessed 19 October 2011 There was an error working with the wiki: Code[78], former There was an error working with the wiki: Code[79] at the There was an error working with the wiki: Code[80]Lynn Garner DOE's fossil energy boss asked to leave by Watkins. (Robert H. Gentile, James Watkins), The Oil Daily, April 30, 1991. (via Highbeam.com, Retrieved on 2011-07-10).Gerhard Peters, John T. Woolley Nomination of Robert H. Gentile To Be an Assistant Secretary of Energy, January 24, 1990, The American Presidency Project, ucsb.edu (1944-02-05). Retrieved on 2011-07-10. was one of four AmpEnergo founders. The design used for the 1 MW plant, originally intended to be inaugurated in October 2011 in the USA, consists of 52 reactors of 27&nbspkW in a standard shipping container.Mats Lewan

Here’s Rossi’s one megawatt plant Ny Teknik 14 september 2011 In early October, Rossi stated that, due to contractual difficulties, the container had not been shipped to the U.S..

Undisclosed customer

A further, as yet undisclosed, customer was present for the inaugural activation of the 1MW plant, which took place in Bologna on October 28, 2011. The demonstration was performed under the control of this unidentified customer who could acquire the plant, "provided that the power consumption to heat output ratio can be verified by the customer."Here are the analyses of the latest E-cat test - NyTeknik

References

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[31]

External links

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[32]

Newest cold-fusion machine does the impossible … or does it?, Teheran Times, April 28, 2011

Italian scientists claim to have demonstrated cold fusion, physorg.com, January 20, 2011

Cold Fusion: “You have to embrace this”, Mats Lewan, Ny Teknik, February 23, 2011

Swedish Skeptics Confirm Renewable Energy World, May 3, 2011

Ny Teknik: 'E-cat': Here is the Greek energy box

University of Cambridge: Andrea Rossi's 'E-cat' nuclear reactor: a video FAQ

See also

E-CAT FOOTER

Directory:Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator (E-Cat)

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1] | News:2012:Rossi Cold Fusion

Mainstream News:Andrea Rossi's LENR E-Cat

Directory:Industrial Heat, LLC - acquired Rossi's technology

PowerPedia:Energy Catalyzer

OS:Replicating the E-Cat

Directory:Andrea Rossi's E-Cat Validations

News:E-Cat Fuel Analysis and Validation Paper Posted October 8, 2014

News:October 28, 2011 Test of the One Megawatt E-Cat

Archive News:Archive:Page 1:October 28, 2011 Test of the One Megawatt E-Cat | News:Archive:Page 2:October 28, 2011 Test of the One Megawatt E-Cat | News:Archive:Page 3:October 28, 2011 Test of the One Megawatt E-Cat | News:Archive:Page 4:October 28, 2011 Test of the One Megawatt E-Cat | There was an error working with the wiki: Code[2]

News:Real-Time Updates on the October 6, 2011 E-Cat Test

Archive News:Archive:October 6, 2011 E-Cat Test Updates:Page 01 | News:Archive:October 6, 2011 E-Cat Test Updates:Page 02 | News:Archive:October 6, 2011 E-Cat Test Updates:Page 03 | There was an error working with the wiki: Code[3]

News:Photos of the October 6, 2011 E-Cat Test

Directory:Andrea Rossi's Cold Fusion Energy Catalyzer (E-Cat): Frequently Asked Questions

Directory:Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator:Rossi's Hints

OS:Cold Fusion E-Cat Case Design Competition

News:Defkalion Hyperion

Template: 315

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[4]

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[5]

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[6]

- PowerPedia

- Main Page

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[81]

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[82]

Comments