From PESWiki

Terms

Trans Information Terms

Part of Trans Information is getting your conscious mind out of the process. Of particular importance is getting your expectations out of the way. Even after all this, certain bits of information have a higher 'sureness factor' than others. I've compartmentalized the information based on how much I trust it to not be from me. The following tags will clarify this.

• VISION (V) - For me, usually from dreams after doing mental exercises and queries before going to bed. Visions are nearly rock solid, but unfortunately suffer from the need to be interpreted. I have many dreams, but only a very few ever feel truly meaningful when I wake up.

• HUNCH (H) - A very strong feeling that something is the way it is. For instance, I have a Hunch that not a single magnet device is capable of producing Free Energy unless it also utilises electricity. I could be wrong. It could just be that it's harder to produce Free Energy with Magnet Motors, but if any of yous makes one that really works I swear I'll eat a SMOT! Also Hunches are the type of information that I most often ascribe to 'Arantha'.

• FEELING (F) - Like a Hunch but not as strong. More information than a sharp stick in the eye, but not by much.

• COMMENT (C) - Usually my thoughts or comments about a Vision, Hunch, or Feeling. Particularly my thoughts on how something I've seen might function. Often used to point out differences between what I would have expected, and what my Vision, or Hunches have told me. In the past I have come to believe information from Visions that greatly differs from what I expect.

• RESEARCH (R) - Often after a Vision I'll look for something similar on the web. I must have done a hundred searches for 'plate + x' after my 'Vision of the Brick' (see below). Also I sometimes combine Research with Hunches/Feelings to guide me towards useful data.

Other Terms

• Free Energy (FE)/Free Energy Device (FED) - In my original notes (especially the Hunches) I described various processes as '(apparent) over unity' (see theory below). After a while this gets really annoying, so let me just define Free Energy as any process that seems to produce more energy than you put into it. By that definition an un-amplified crystal radio, a solar cell, a thermocouple, a windmill, a nuclear reactor, and a hydroelectric dam are all Free Energy Devices. (Also, pumping gas and running away without paying with a pair of panties over your licence plate [sic].) I think this was to deflect the inevitable criticism of mainstream science. If you copy this and post it somewhere else you may consider replacing 'free energy' with '(apparent) over unity'.

ADDENDUM - Even though I really hate that term, it seems that my source really likes it. My source feels that the device is no different than a solar cell and that the whole concept of 'Free' Energy is very misleading. Ok whatever.

• Graviton - A large part of my Hunches concern the nature of gravity (see theory below). One of my major hunches (very strong) is that Gravitons are everywhere and that they push mass not attract it. Almost every standard theory of gravity today postulates that Gravitons are emitted by mass and pull mass to them. When I use the term Graviton I mean "Omni Bountiful Omni Directional Push Gravitons".

Forward

-From Arantha

This is a rough outline for the generation of Free Energy as detailed by Arantha. Much of the terminology used will be technically incorrect due to my lack of proper vocabulary. I leave it up to the reader to decipher what I'm describing.

This is not so much a blueprint as a sign post to get you going in the right direction. Those with sufficient intuition combined with (but not hampered by) a workable understanding of gravity, quantum mechanics, and electronics should (with a little trial and error) be able to use these instructions to construct an (apparent) over unity device.

The name of the device, which is as basic as an electric motor in civilizations throughout the universe, is purposely omitted. Naming the device (generator, collector, converter, translator, concentrator) often implies a method of it's functioning, which will necessarily change as the understanding of physical laws changes.

Visions

The Device

The Device: First Hunch

Two conducting plates are fixed parallel to each other.

A positive voltage is applied to both plates and released (F). Upon release a 'feedback' charge is produced. When constructed and calibrated correctly the feedback charge will be greater than the energy expended for the initiation charge, by a small but measurable amount.

(The exact way the plates are charged is still somewhat unclear to me, and subsequent visions have only clouded not clarified this. They may be charged like a common capacitor but they may be charged in some other way. I'm not even sure if one can apply voltage to 'both' plates of a capacitor at the same time. I should note that when I 'saw' this I didn't even know that two parallel plates was a capacitor (C/R).)

The magnitude of the feedback charge is based on:

• The surface area of the plates (more = more)
• The distance they are separated (less = more)
• The material between the plates (lighter/vacuum = more)
• The waveform of the applied voltage. (square > sinusoidal)

Only a certain initiation charge is necessary to cause the feedback charge. Any power over this threshold level is wasted (F). The charge voltage should pulse as short as possible. Any duration over a certain (very short) time is wasted. With the materials in use now, it is virtually impossible to make the pulse too short. Making the pulse too long is the main cause of the process NOT achieving over unity (H).

This charge pulse/feedback charge cycle can be repeated as many times as possible with no discernable regeneration time. It is only limited by the response time of the components used. This is mainly because using current technology the machine barely taps a tiny percentage of the theoretical maximum (H).

After initiation by an external power source, the device will run indefinitely if it uses its own feedback charge to generate its charge pulse. Common first designs use a rechargeable battery to initiate the process, which then leeches off a small amount of the (apparent) over unity energy to replenish it's charge for the next start. Civilizations that make this discovery early often use a crank and a large capacitor. Earth is NOT one of those 'early risers'. This design may be better for remote and undeveloped areas because the components (the rechargeable battery) will not wear out as quickly (H).

The Device: A Vision of 'The Brick'

I saw a vision of a simple device last night. It was slick and sleek like something one would buy at the Sharper Image.

It consisted of metal plates with rounded corners about 5" x 8" and stacked together in a cube about 4" high. Each plate was offset from the next plate by discs of black material. The discs were about ½" diameter, ½" high, and about ½" from the (rounded) corners of the plates. The discs on the top and bottom were rounded to make knobs that would keep the 'brick' off of any flat surface on which it was sitting. The plates themselves were about 2mm thick and coated with shiny golden metal (V).

As is the case with visions, I could 'sense' things that would not be apparent just from seeing them. The plates were a hard metal (to me zinc and copper are soft metals (C)), and the coating was electroplated and polished. The discs were something like hard dry rubber. They reminded me of carbon fibre washers that are sometimes used in barbeques. It had a certain 'tightness' (well made) to it. Either it had bolts through the washers/plates, or was made with epoxy and pressure (V). The source of the 'tightness' I couldn't see (C).

On the short (5") end each plate had a small tab in the centre connected to it's own wire, the wire was much thicker than that used for a 9 volt battery, but slightly smaller than one side of that used for a house lamp. The wire was well insulated, perhaps even a bit thicker than would be normal for that gauge. A few inches from the 'brick' the wires were collected in a black corrugated sleeve like cable management tubes used in computer installations. The sleeve ran off to some 'black box' which was not the focus of this vision (V)

This will be a commercial device (VVV). Perhaps a novelty, but functioning nonetheless. It didn't feel like this thing could power a house, but more like a small radio or a nightlight (H). Would you pay $200 at the Sharper Image for a shiny gold brick that can power a small emergency radio and/or an LED flashlight FOREVER with NO BATTEREIS? Besides, if you're going to look into the future you might as well look at the $200 one instead of the ugly grey $40 one (that works just as good) from Sears (C).

After a few days my only feeling of the black box (for THIS device) is that it's small and simple, being about ¾" x 1 ½" x 2 ½". (I expected it to be big like a car battery charger (C).) It may have had another (simpler) cord leaving from the opposite side that the charge plate wires entered(H).

Since this will be a commercial device (VVV), it will comply with product laws common in industrialized countries (C). Things like Underwriters Laboratories approval, product liability assessments, and FCC radio interference laws would all be the same for this device as for every TV, Computer, Electric Motor, Transformer etcetera (C deduction)

Because of this certain things can be deduced from this information, namely:

• It functions in air (V).It doesn't produce arcs, or ozone.
• Anyone can touch it while it's operating, even a child. It must not be capable of shocking or hurting anyone. Either the total power is very low or touching the plates causes them to not work (naturally or by safety circuitry). Possibly, (or not) the power is actually collected in the 'black box' and not dangerous until it is collected (C).
• The device has no RF shielding. It does not interfere with (nor is it susceptible to) any current (or future) RF products, nor does it hinder pacemakers (no warning sticker) (H).

I was really taken aback by how different this vision was from what I expected (or interpolated) from the first 'Hunch'. For instance I expected the plates to be barely a few mm apart (C), not a huge 10-15mm (V). I also expected the plates to be hooked up every other one to a wire. This would have saved a lot of production costs (C). I can only deduce that the individual wires are vitally necessary in this 'multi plate' configuration (H). Even though I still feel that the effect can be produced in just two plates (H), perhaps complicated pulsing, switching, collecting, and grounding (from the 'black box') dramatically increases the efficiency (C). Since even now I'm still not sure how the charge pulse/feedback charge works it's hard for me to even speculate.

I have no idea what the gold (brass?) plating was for. It might prevent corrosion, but then again it might be for no other reason than marketing. (Remember suckers are going to pay 200$ for this at Sharper Image, it might really even be gold (C).)

One thing that occurred to me is that perhaps this device was purposely made to be low power (remember it's a novelty) (C). Perhaps close plates are more efficient but require a higher charge voltage. Such a device might be a thousand times more efficient and produce a kilowatt or more, but create hazardous amounts of voltage for exposed plates, significant RF noise, and ozone producing ionization. It may not even work outside of a vacuum (C).

The Device: The 'Black Box'

I still haven't had any clear visions of the box. I did have one weird and convoluted vision of the charge going into the wires however.

Anyway in my dream I was looking at a grid near the block. Each cube of space had three values: electrical, magnetic, and virtual. Electrical and Magnetic were easy to compute and could be -1,0,1. Virtual was weird, in that it's value was always a letter and not an explicit value, like the imaginary number 'i'. Certain configurations of space blocks with E and M values aligned correctly would yield various multiples of v, like 2v, 3v etcetera Somehow this jumble was the key to the functioning of the device (F- Even though this vision was clear, I feel that I have utterly failed to interpret it correctly, thus it gets an F not a V)

The Pulse

The Pulse: General

Most of my attempts to get information about the black box have instead led me to hunches and visions of the 'Charge Pulse'. It is significantly more complicated than from the first 'hunch', and subsequent visions have all led me to believe that the 'Charge Pulse' is the major factor in the functioning of the device (H). I didn't realize how much of this material was devoted to the pulse. I don't even remember writing some of this down (C). It might be a little 'messy' because it was compiled from about 8 different Visions, Hunches, and Feelings.

Certain properties of 'The Pulse' seem to be fairly constant across visions. These are:

• The pulse is 0 to positive (H). NOTE: I recently learned that in conventional electricity 'current' (electron holes) flows from positive to ground, while the actual electrons flow from ground to positive, so I might have this exactly opposite (or it may not matter) (C). What matters is that an alternating current WILL NOT WORK (H).
• The pulse is incredibly short, in the order of micro seconds, perhaps even nano or pico seconds.
• The pulse has a very very very fast rise time and it's basic form is a square wave.
• The zero time is longer than the pulse time by at least a factor of 3 probably more (F). From 'feeling' the device work it's more around 5-30 pulses per second (H).
• The pulse is high voltage, although amperage can be very low (H). Whether it's 500 or 5,000 or 50,000 volts I don't know. It may depend on the size (and spacing) of the plates (C).

The Pulse: Specific

I'm starting to get the feeling that the pulse is responsible for 90% of the phenomenon in the device. Whether the 'collector' is plates, coils, spark gaps, or just the wires themselves, it seems the pulse is the critical factor (H). (I still think that my plates vision is the most efficient, but with over unity anything over 100% is 'good enough' (F/C). ) Having the pulse be high voltage (current seems unimportant), positive square, and as short as possible seems to have more effect than almost any configuration of 'collector' (H).

I had a vision of the pulse (more like a 'mind taste' or maybe a dream). If you could hear it, it would sound like a 'tic'. Like a little miniature (super fast) lightning bolt. In the vision I could feel something about space/time itself wrench with the pulse, and the feeling would go right through my dream body. It was NOT a frequency, but rather just a few tics per second (H).

From what I can tell controlling the duration of the pulse is the main 'inefficiency point' in most of these machines. Making the pulse as short as possible, should be a primary goal. With current technology, it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to make the pulse too short. Most solid state devices use a charged capacitor to build the high voltages necessary for the pulse, but conversely discharging the whole capacitor (no matter how small) makes the pulse too long and wastes energy (H).

The Pulse: A Vision

I've had hunches and twinges but no stark visions or images lately. I did have another fuzzy dream of the pulse. The voltage has to be high in order to 'slam' something. The image I had was of a metal rod slamming into a metal block at incredible speed. The weight of the rod is not so important as it's speed. (Note that this was a metaphorical vision, with the rod being fast rise time, high voltage). After the piston hits the slab (and is removed just as quickly), the slab is momentarily altered. The atoms become 'primed' (in the vision they were 'confused' and 'disoriented'), and in that 'primed' state they perform some process for a very short time. Something enters them or leaves them, with the net result (possibly after several transitions) is that extra energy is imparted to the electrons of the atoms as a potential (V).

Even though I think the 'rod smashed into block' is metaphorical, on second thought it might NOT be so abstract. I was thinking of something similar to the piezoelectric effect that can be produced in almost any solid material violently shocked. Even though I know the 'rod smashed into block' can not be used to produce (apparent) over unity, the effects MAY be similar (F).

 __          _________          __           _________
|\ |        |\        |        |  |         |         |
| \|        | \       |        |  |         |         |
|  \        |  \      |        |  |         |         |
|  |\       |   \     |        |  |         |         |
|  | \      |    \    |        |  |         |         |
|  |  \     |     \   |        |  |         |         |
|  |   \    |      \  |        |  |         |         |
|  |    \   |       \ |        |  |         |         |
|  |     \  |        \|   or   |  |         |         |    time--->
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   A             B             |   A    /   |    B   /
                               |       /    |       /
                               |      /     |      /
                               |     /      |     /
                               |    /       |    /
                               |   /        |   /
                               |  /         |  /
                               | /          | /
                               |/           |/

SQUARE: Charge Pulse
DIAGONAL: Feedback Charge

A : (ultra short square pulse, over unity)
energy expended : 36.0 units
energy feedback : 45.0 units
net energy  : + 9.0 (125% efficiency)

B : (long square pulse, NOT over unity)

energy expended : 99.0 units
energy feedback : 45.0 units
net energy  : -54.0 (45% efficiency)

This is just a mental picture of the Charge Pulse/Feedback Charge. I think that attempting to 'recycle' the Charge Pulse ruins it's efficacy. Also the Feedback Charge graph is more like 1/t.

The Pulse: Other Devices

I have been striving to get a better view of the 'black box' and the way it operates. Also, I've been researching other (alleged) free energy devices. So far the only machines that seem to make sense to me are those that use ultra short, positive high voltage pulses. There are other devices that work in other ways, but they just don't seem 'right' (H). So far there are three that use this type of pulse. They are from Edwin Gray, Tom Bearden, and Floyd Sweet respectively.

Tom Bearden's idea about 'preserving potential' makes my intuition ring full on false (H). (Note: A guy talking to his imaginary friend isn't really in a strong debating position to criticise other peoples theories (C).) There is one thing he said that sounds right he postulates that certain materials would work better (in his system) than others. Namely he ties the functioning of his device to the 'relaxation time' of the conductor. (According to him the relaxation time is inversely related to how long an electron can travel in a conductor without hitting an atom. Thus good conductors have very low relaxation times and don't work very well.) He points out that copper has a virtually zero relaxation time, while other less conductive materials (semiconductors) have (relatively) long relaxation times. His device uses aluminium doped with iron (R/H). Edwin Gray's 'collector' has a spark gap inside a copper cylinder sleeve, but included inside that cylinder is a block of carbon (in series) with the spark gap as a resister, another long relaxation time material (R/H). I get a strong feeling that the material of the plates in my device is a hard coarse grey metal (the cheap 'Sears' version (F)).

|                        Edwin Gray's 'Collector'
|                        ------------------------
|
|
|          -----------------> (Extra Collected Energy)
|          |
|     _____|________________
|     perforated copper tube
|
|  ------|> <|----/\/\/\/\/-------<(High Voltage, Super Short Pulse)
|
|       air gap    carbon
|                  block

(I should point out that one of my pet peeves is 'moving parts', anything that moves will eventually fail, while solid state devices will last forever. So I have a natural prejudice against motors and moving machines. I also don't like magnets because they weaken over time (C).)

At first 'the spinning wheel' FE devices seemed as plausible as perpetual motion magnet motors (not possible at all) but as I've come to understand them, they seem to mimic all the basic principles of the other pulse type devices by using mechanical processes instead of solid state processes. For instance, the spinning wheels are actually electrostatic generators which produce super high voltages at low currents (charge separation). This is equivalent to a battery/ oscillator/ step up transformer/ rectifier/ and capacitor. A spark gap linked to the wheel's motion serves as a gate transistor/ pulse generator. If you think of the initial momentum of the wheel as the stored energy of the battery, then taking some of the (apparent) over unity power to drive the wheel could be seen at 'recharging' it (R/F).

Almost every analysis says that the two large metal canisters in front of the Testatica machine are large capacitors, but a person who says he actually saw inside them shows a rather bizarre device consisting of inductors around rod magnets, all of which, was surrounded by alternating canisters of aluminium and copper. The copper cylinders were perforated. THIS device while still (possibly, technically) being a capacitor bears an uncanny resemblance to the air gap/carbon block/collector (the main FE part) of Edwin Gray's circuit (R/F). If the spark gap high voltage pulses go through these canisters then it works exactly like Edwin Gray's collector.

I've seen several more devices that use pulses, this time in plasma tubes and corona discharges. This seems as messy as moving parts (chemicals, corrosion, and electrode wear), but I don't see any real difference between plasma in a tube, and an air gap. I think an air gap (or plasma) would be similar to a long relaxation time material like doped aluminium. As usual these pulsed plasma tubes produce electricity that exhibits 'cooling' properties (See "Observable Properties" and "Theory" below) (R/F).

I have a feeling (H) that if a gas is subjected to the pulse, then it may not 'transition' like a conductor. It may emit it's 'feedback charge' as em waves, photons, heat, free electrons (plasma), or any combindation of these. In a pulsed gas (even air in a spark gap) a collector would need to be used like an anode, or a 'shell' around the pulse location in order to collect the feedback charge (H).

The Pulse: The Pulse Process

Been thinking about the similarity to capacitors of my plates. I did a little research and concluded that 10cm x 16cm plates, 1cm apart, with only air in between would actually be a 15 pico farad capacitor which would officially make it the most inefficient capacitor ever made for it's size (a 15 pF capacitor would normally be about 5 mm (C/R)). Still there may be a reason for why a crappy capacitor might be more efficient than coils, spark gaps, or just wires in FE devices (C/R).

It all comes down to the amount of material that gets directly subjected to the pulse (to the actual electrons). In almost every other configuration, the electricity stays in the skin of the conductor, thus the real amount of material that is directly subjected to the pulse is very small, I think (or feel) that a very small capacitance/very high voltage capacitor (or whatever it is) would subject 100% of the material to the pulse (F).

Even if my device is a capacitor, I know for a hard fact (H) that putting a dielectric between the plates would make it work WORSE. The whole purpose of the plates is just to expose more material directly to the pulse (H). A dielectric would slow down the pulse (F). Similarly the reason that plates work better than say inductors is that the magnetic field builds slowly (relatively) and thus 'slows down' and 'blunts' the charge pulse (H).

Was focusing back on my vision of the 'brick' and even though the plates were gold(? C) plated, I'm sure the plates themselves were some hard metal (this rules out copper, which I feel is soft). The plates could have been steel, iron, or even aluminium. The gold plating might have been to 'pretty up' an otherwise ugly (easily corroded) metal (or not). From my vision of the 'rod into metal slab' I feel the metal should be exceptionally hard (although that might be figurative for some other property), almost to the point of brittleness. It would be better if the metal cracked rather than bend or deform (in the vision) (F).

Theory

Theory: General

I don't really know when my visions shifted to theory. Like I said before, I really don’t care how it works, just that it works. But still, after writing the observable properties section (next) which was actually my second vision (and then again later) certain things did come to me and again when I focused more on the pulse.

I do not invalidate any working theory so far. I do not claim that 'evil orthodox science' has it all wrong. Newtown's Laws of Motion were excellent and nearly perfect. It was only at the extrema that they began to break down. Relativity solved these problems for 'unusual' circumstances like high speeds. Similarly I feel (H) that the physical laws we know so well are right 99% of the time and only break down in 'unusual' circumstances. It is this hunt for 'non-classical' processes that defines (apparent) over unity devices (C).

Also, since I'm so object (and math) oriented the mathematics of a theory are much more important to me. The conceptualization of the theory is not nearly as important as it being mathematically consistent, and able to produce verifiable postulations. I readily admit that my conceptualization of this theory may be totally wrong, most likely because of my deficiencies in visualizing abstract topologies (C).

Theory Visions:

• Gravity pushes and it is gravity 'shadows' around masses that causes the pushing of gravity to be uneven in favour towards masses (H).
• The push energy of gravity is MASSIVE, perhaps being near (or more C) to the energy density of matter itself. A cubic centimetre of space should have huge amounts of energy in it (H).
• Gravity interacts on matter in an incredibly weak manner. The vast majority of it passes through matter without interacting at all (H).
• Gravity is quantised into Gravitons and this quantised nature causes all mass exposed to gravitons to jitter at the quantum level. This imparts a real kinetic energy to matter (H).
• The rate of absorption of gravitons by mass is the direct cause of the progression of time. If the local graviton density is zero, time completely stops in that area (H) (I have no idea how this part works (C).)
• The high voltage, super short pulse causes certain materials to momentarily adsorb more gravitons than normal (H). Perhaps many magnitudes of order more (F/C). After several conversions (state changes, whatever) the extra gravitons adsorbed by the material are converted into energy which is imparted to the electrons of the material.
• This process happens in all materials and parts of a circuit directly exposed to the pulse, including the wires, AND ANY DEVICE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE CIRCUIT. (See "Observable Properties" below about cooling (C).)
• For all it's gee wiz neatness, the device is nothing more than an over glorified solar cell, or more precisely a graviton cell (C/F).

Note: If one thinks of the gravity field (zero point energy field) as massive, then one could visualize 'classic gravitons' as 'holes' in this field. Such holes would 'appear' to be emitted by mass, and then cause attraction when 'adsorbed' by another mass (C).

Observable Properties

Observable Properties: General

Even before (apparent) over unity is achieved certain properties will be observable. The presence (or absence) of these properties will help you refine the design of the device. These properties include:

• Near the charge plates time will slow down (H).
• Near the charge plates gravity will decrease (H).
• Near the charge plates mass will decrease (H).
• Near the charge plates the ambient temperature will drop (H).

Of these properties only time slowing down is easily (via atomic clocks) measurable with your current technology. This is because first designs will convert barely a tiny percentage of the theoretically possible energy for a given volume. As the device nears it's theoretical maximum the effects will become much more pronounced (H).

Observable Properties: Detail

Previously I stated my 'hunches' about phenomena near the working plates. I think ALL of these phenomena are the result of the SAME process (H). Namely the decrease in the local graviton field (whatever that field may actually be), by converting gravitons into electricity (H). This decrease is EXACLY the same as that produced by masses like the earth, although many orders of magnitude higher (yes, HIGHER per unit volume than that produced by the earth) (H). Also massive bodies may be acting in this exact same way, that is, the Earth itself may be converting gravitons into electricity/kinetic energy, especially in the interior of the planet (F). This could account for both the core temperature (as opposed to heavy element fission), and the earth's electro-magnetic field. More detail:

Gravity decrease:

The conversion of gravitons near the plates will decrease the ambient level of gravitons. In a pre-existing gravity field (like the surface of a planet), more gravitons will be adsorbed from the side facing away from the planet simply because there are more gravitons from this side already. The net result is that near the machine pre existing graviton imbalances will decrease, as the total number of gravitons also decreases (H).

Time slowing down:

Exactly as predicted by Relativity time will slow down in the presence of a gravity field. When running, the device will decrease the local density of gravitons exactly like a massive body, in effect producing a local 'gravity field'. The absorption of gravitons is directly related to the progression of time (H). If one were able to completely vacate an area of all gravitons, time would STOP in that area (H). (The local density of gravitons is also responsible for the 'curvature' of space, but I still don't completely understand this yet (C).)

Mass reduction:

A more accurate description would be inertia reduction, but coupled with 'less weight' it would appear as though objects in the field become less massive (even as the total number of atoms in the object stays the same). I'm running on pure 'hunch' here, but the ability to accelerate an object (relative to an outside observer) is directly dependent on the local density of the gravitons. A billiard ball in the field will APPEAR to require less energy to accelerate. A converse way of viewing this, is that the space in the field is compressed. If the ball leaves the field (or it is turned off) it will APPEAR to return to the velocity predicted by the force applied to it. In a strong enough field any object can be accelerated to near C (for an outside observer) with almost no energy, while the object itself experiences almost no time. From inside the object it would APPEAR as though it were travelling many times faster than the speed of light (H).

Temperature reduction:

A decrease in the local graviton density will also cause a REAL temperature reduction in that area (H). That is to say, the chilled materials will not immediately spring back to normal ambient temperature when the field is turned off (unlike the billiard ball that slows down). (I'm not exactly sure why this is, someone who understands mathematics better could probably figure it out from the other effects (C).) It may be that the adsorption of gravitons by mass imparts some kinetic energy, and the absence of gravitons causes what could be perceived as a loss of ambient (heat) kinetic energy over time (C). I DO 'know' (hunch) that the inability to cool things below about .3 Kelvin is because of the kinetic energy imparted to mass from the local graviton field (H).

Conclusion:

The reason why I went into such detail about these effects is because I have a 'hunch' that this is how so many of the so called UFO's operate. (I have no hunches whatsoever about who pilots them (C).) By constructing collector plates that only collect gravitons from one direction, the vehicles could APPEAR to accelerate almost instantaneously, also the power generated would probably have to be 'dumped' in whatever way was easiest (and least harmful to the occupants), which may account for the high ionization seen around such craft. The sharp turns, sudden stops, and massive accelerations could all be explained by focused control of the rate at which gravitons are destroyed near the craft. The occupants inside would feel little or no inertia at all as the field manipulation would 'accelerate' every particle in their bodies simultaneously (H).

Observable Properties: Other Devices

I've never seen these properties other than in my visions. After a lot of research though, certain devices seem to be working in nearly the exact same way. The inventors often come up with bizarre or weird theories as to their functioning. For instance Floyd Sweet claims that his device produces 'negative energy' that 'cools instead of heats' while creating 'neg-entropy' (negative entropy), and causing 'time to run backwards' (R). While I don't discount that his device works in a manner similar to that outlined here, these conclusions just don't ring 'right' with my inner voice (H).

It seems to me that differently constructed devices would have more or less (in varying proportions) of the previously outlined properties depending on how they were built, and there is no need to come up with 'magic' theories to explain their working apart from the nature of gravitons and how they relate to space, time and energy (H). (This from a guy talking to his imaginary friend (C).)

I'm also starting to see how different devices could produce varying amounts of the previously stated effects. Namely Over Unity, Anti-Gravity, and Cooling. It might be possible that a device produces the 'effect' (graviton conversion) extraordinarily well, but then fails to collect the feedback charge efficiently (F/C). Partially because the effect is generated in surrounding materials like the air, or nearby dielectrics. This might explain why some devices exhibit massive Anti-Gravity, while others show virtually none at all (F/C). Also where the conversion takes place would effect what parts become cool. If the conversion happens in the surrounding air (and the excess energy collected as radio noise) the cooling effect would hardly be noticeable (F/C). Thus the efficiency and properties of the device would depend on three factors.

• What AMOUNT of material is 'primed' by the pulse.
• WHAT material is primed by the pulse.
  • The skin of wires
  • Plates
  • The surrounding air
• How efficiently the 'Feedback Charge' is collected.

Errata

One thing I found that looks very similar to my vision is called a C-Stack. The creator claims that it exhibits 'unusual' (but not over unity) properties.

|                      C-Stack
|                      -------
|
|                -------plate------- .......
|               xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      .
|               x    dielectric     x      .
|               xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      .
|     .......... -------plate-------       .
|     .         xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   Applied
|   Output      x    dielectric     x   Voltage
|     .         xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   High Hz
|     .......... -------plate-------     (+/-)
|               xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      .
|               x    dielectric     x      .
|               xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      .
|                -------plate------- .......

I do know that taking out the dielectric is essential, as it just 'gunks up' the (apparent) over unity effect (H).

I only include this because even now I'm not totally sure how the charge pulse/feedback charge is generated and collected. A brick with 8 or 9 plates could be pulsed/collected in a large number of permutations mostly because of the switching ability of the 'black box' (C). For instance the innermost/outermost could be pulsed with all the others collecting, every two could be pulsed with every third plate grounded to isolate them from one another, or they could be pulsed in quick series succession (C). These are not visions or hunches but rather rampant speculation.

Addendum

(ALL COMMENT/FEELING)
After a while of reflection it's occurred to me that a lot of my visions are governed by my natural dislike of certain things, namely moving parts, things that wear out, and magnets. While I'm still sure that something that looks like this can produce (apparent) over unity, I think that perhaps other configurations might work as well (or even better, at least for first designs). The important part is the charge pulse/feedback charge and the pulsed materials (H). Still, I like solid state devices, and I was shown a solid state device.

I think that if I were just starting I would build an electrostatic generator powered by an electric motor, that way I could focus on the pulse, the feedback charge collection, and pulsed materials and not have to fiddle around with transformers, rectifiers, and capacitors. Also the materials and expertise for an electrostatic generator are more within my means (currently). Of course the pulse would still need to be controlled with solid state components even with a spark gap.

Also, over unity in such a device would be readily apparent when it runs it's own motor indefinitely. With batteries or mains power there is room for 'fudging' of the data, and room for doubt as to it's authenticity.

I keep getting more 'hunches' and I'm too lazy to put them in the sections they belong. Posibly (H) subjecting a gas to the pulse might mitigate the need for such a super short pulse (It would still have to be very short). The machines that I 'feel' have the best chance of working (and not being frauds) all have air gaps. An image of a 'neon' tube coated with metal on the inside came to me recently. I think this is part of me accepting the validity (as long as they pulse) of non solid state devices. The current would still need to be high voltage, fast rise time, positive pulsed, square wave, but something about the gas might make it so that no energy is wasted on atoms that have already been primed (F).

Measurement Rant

I have another 'hunch' that digital electric meters are notoriously bad at measuring ultra short pulses accurately (H). Also I get the feeling that the destruction of gravitons (and corresponding effects) occurs in almost every part of the primary pulse circuit. INCLUDING A DIGITAL ELECTRIC METER connected to that circuit (H). Now many optimist would immediately jump on this as 'proof' that over unity is being achieved (even when the metre says it's not) (C). I posit the exact opposite view, namely that the time effects of graviton conversion will cause a digital meter to FALSLY read MORE energy than is actually in the circuit (H). I only trust real work done with (apparent) over unity energy, that is, use it to heat something, or lift something, or drive a motor, and then measure THAT energy. Only measured real work and/or the device powering itself should be construed as (apparent) over unity (H/C). I also get the feeling that putting the collection plates near a (modern) CPU or high speed RAM would cause them to malfunction(F). (Side Note: Naming your digital metre company 'FLUKE' is just silly. It's like naming a jumbo jet company 'sometimes' or 'mostly'.)

Theory Rant

(ALL COMMENT)
I remember one of the very last 'New Age' books I read was about telekinesis. I expected mental exercises, visualizations, perhaps some special knowledge to help develop the ability. Instead I got half assed reports about Russian psychic works, spoon benders, and a lot of useless touchy feely philosophical crap about "when you're ready you will be able to move the quarter." (I was way ready, and still am. And I was also out $8, and now 'ready' to quit the New Age movement.) I still believe in a lot of New Age stuff, but mostly what I could verify myself (like Astral Projection and Faeries).

I read these "cult of personality" inventors with their theories and it really sticks in my craw. Perhaps it's because I'm so object oriented. I don't really care how something works, just that it works within defined parameters. For all their books and theories where's the frikin' toy that runs forever? Where's my working SMOT baby? I'm not gonna buy your $15 book (inflation) unless it also comes with a "perpetual motion propeller hat" as a working example. If it comes with a working example I'll buy 20 books (and read them too).

It just seems to me that a lot of these guys are no different than Chanellers and Gurus except that they cater to a different psychological type. I don't debunk anybody or anything just that anybody selling "The Secret of Free Energy" better deliver it to your house in a frikin' UFO, otherwise he should put it on the web for free (like me).

Update to Visions

Reflection

It's been a little while since I wrote "Arantha's Visions of Free Energy". It's kind of weird, because I can barely remember writing any of it. Even though I've forgot most of what I wrote, there have been a few things niggling at the back of my mind since then. It seems that since I got it all out, I've been less obsessed with it, and conversely able to perceive it in a slightly more clear way.

I think that I may have 'over thought' it, or to be more precise, I may have injected too much of myself and my thinking of how things might work into the final material. And although reading about other supposed free energy devices may have sparked my intuition, that knowledge may have also served to contaminate the 'Trans Information' derived from that intuition, especially since I feel that one or more (or all) of them may be scams or hoaxes.

Probably Wrong

First off, I don't know if what I wrote down is wrong, or more likely, misleading but since then a few things have been bothering me. I probably shouldn't have put any of that 'gravity into kinetic energy' stuff, or the need of super high voltage super short duration dc pulse to 'affect as much material as possible'. It's not that I think these things are wrong, but that I may have been confusing causes and effects, or obscuring the real non classical events behind superfluous or auxiliary phenomena. I think that trying to define how something works (and possibly getting it wrong) detracts from the fact that that it does work or something very similar to it works (or maybe it doesn’t).

New Visions

Since then I've been having 3 clear hunch/visions. These are different from my previous visions in that I was not actively seeking anything about free energy, and the visions keep (annoyingly) recurring. I get the feeling that they will continue to plague me until I disgorge them here.

One vision is the feeling that the parallel plates charged with the same voltage (both positive or negative) somehow invoke the Casimir effect. That a static field has a sort of 'virtual mass and volume' thus when the two plates are charged they 'virtually expand'. In the area where the fields meet between the two plates the small zone left free of the fields somehow induces a Casimir or related effect. One reason why the charge needs to be super high voltage super short dc pulse is that it forces the fields together and makes the 'virtual free space' as small as possible. After that, I'm not really sure how it works or how it might produce electricity.

The second vision takes off from the first in that instead of two plates there is one hollow metal ball about 3 inches across. The metal is dull and grey. Sometimes there is another ball about 6 inches across around the first (also dull metal grey) and sometimes there is not. The feeling I get is that when the hollow metal ball is pulsed, a sort of Casimir like singularity or point forms for a microsecond in the exact centre, and then the 'non classical' process begins.

The third vision relates to the first two in that I keep getting the feeling this process is very similar to the anomalous effects seen in sono luminescence. What is mass anyway? Or to be more precise what makes an object solid, if not electric fields? When you jump off a building gravity takes 100 metres to accelerate you while electro repulsive forces take .00001 mm to decelerate you. I guess the gist of this vision is that there is no difference between a static field and the 'solidness' of matter. Using this assumption a clever person might be able to devise a mechanism to take advantage of this process. Also, studying such a mechanism might lead to understanding sono luminescence and vice versa.