Talk:PowerPedia:Creation: The Physical Truth
From PESWiki
The article was first created by myself at Wikipedia (see article page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation:_The_Physical_Truth)) and is now being subjected to deletion by fanatic science ('Relativity') editors there, like the bishop of the middle ages that refused to look through Galileo's telescope (see deletion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Creation:_The_Physical_Truth)), who are supressing at Wikipedia all alternative views, sourced or not, to the mainstream dogma. --Utad3 09:58, 2 Jan 2007 (EST)
References section
Well, my disclaimer sentence :) I may have missed some references and/or I may have inadvertedly typed innacurate data; I'll have a carefull look as soon as possible. Tx! --Utad3 06:23, 4 Jan 2007 (EST)
Freaking Colliders & Reactors
About the following passage from the article: "The author alerts to the serious risks of the recent pursuit of full-scale fusion power (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power) (thermonuclear) reactors and of high-speed impacts experiments in large colliders (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collider)."
I would link this passage to the three current physics international megalomaniac projects, Beasts, under construction:
- a) the violent high-energy impact experiments, creating freaking forms of matter (learn more (http://www.aspden.org/arp/2005arp4.pdf)), at the very large colliders LHC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider) & ILC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Linear_Collider);
- b) the fusion power technology, also a "burning plasma experiment", based on their erroneous understanding of how stars are formed (learn more (http://www.aspden.org/books/2edpoc/2edpocch8.pdf)), at the full-scale thermonuclear reactor ITER (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER).
"Rees [Lord Martin Rees, an international leader in cosmology and space science, in his book The Last Century, 2003] tells us that the Brookhaven Report and a parallel effort by scientists from the biggest European accelerator, CERN in Geneva, indicates that, by running their experiments for 10 years, the risk of a catastrophe is no more than 1 to 50 million. He then alerts us as to what this means. It is not that such a catastrophe might kill 50 millionth of the world's population, but rather that there is a 1 in 50 million chance that the whole of the world's population will be killed.
Are we to believe that those scientists really know how to calculate those odds, when they have no idea how to decipher the messages hidden in the values of the fundamental physical constants that have already been measured with very high precision?"
- by Harold Aspden in Creation: The Physical Truth, p.143, 2006 --Utad3 13:32, 13 Jan 2007 (EST)
Why we should Keep it
The whole purpose of this site is Science and Free energy (and inventions to conserve it). This book sits comfortably under these topics. Is it that somebody cannot cope with the Physical Truth?
