OS:Magnetic Piston

From PESWiki

The Magnetic Piston and Validation of Free Energy

HOME | definitions | Correlated Principles | CAM/CoE Cycle | Magnetic Devices | COGGER

INTRODUCTION

Absolute conservation of energy has all the ear markings of ‘flat earth.’ Clues to the existence of free energy are commonly ignored in favor of theories based on a circular logic presumption that free energy cannot exist.

Tidal locking of the moon causing the same surface to always face earth, cogging stepper motors, and the hydrologic rain cycle are prime examples of phenomena that challenge absolute conservation of energy. The existence of free, un-conserved, energy is easy to challenge based on the laws of thermodynamics. Accordingly, reactions producing free energy in all the examples are not thermodynamic reactions but they are readily dismissed for lacking utility. Absolute conservation of energy is believed to be valid for all thermodynamic reactions and cycles utilizing gaseous working substances. Comparing attributes of thermodynamic cycles to the exampled cycles precipitates fundamental differences that lead to invention of numerous machines with more utility. The free energy reactions in all three examples, directly or indirectly, can be applied to useful machines. The simplest machine with the most visual impact is expected to validate the existence of free, non-conserved, energy and has been dubbed a Magnetic Piston.

The Magnetic Piston project has multiple goals. Obviously, the dream of making an overunity device to improve Earth’s energy problems with free energy is in the foreground. The Magnetic Piston , in itself, is likely to never achieve such a lofty goal. However, there are at least three patented devices that verify overunity free energy. Two of the patented examples are magnetic devices by inventors inspired by the teachings of Nicola Tesla. James Murray III ’s alternator (us4780632) and Howard Johnson’s motor (us4151431) may have justly been dismissed by industry because they lacked commercial utility, but free energy lacking validation in spite of their reproducible working models is puzzling. Free energy claims are inevitably followed with two valid questions. How is the 2nd thermodynamic law violated? What new technology enables the claim? The first question is simply answered by the magnetic reactions being out of the ‘jurisdiction’ of thermodynamics. Murray and Johnson may have both been too brilliant to see the significance of underlying magnetic effects they took for granted. The Magnetic Piston is modeled to simplistically demonstrate a possible explanation for the effect. Minimally the Magnetic Piston will be a vehicle for numerous experiments to delve deeper into unearthed secrets of magnetism.

Tesla also had little publicized theories of free energy based on momentum reactions of the moon. A device with locking pins exhibited free energy potential long before NASA tried to define new technology to explain ever expanding mysteries of the lunar orbit. NASA and others tried to solve the puzzle by placing mirror arrays on the moon’s surface and taking data for over 25 years. It could be argued that more mystery was uncovered than puzzles were solved. Theories of a statistically improbable collision are readily accepted in lieu of accepting the existence of free energy while the new lunar technology. Kepler’s equations, cleverly applied by Tesla may suggest that old technology may be adequate to solve at least part of the lunar puzzle.

Stepper motors are notoriously inefficient. One would be hard pressed to find empirical data showing that all the inefficiency of stepper motors is dissipated as frictional heat, resistive heat, and eddy current heat losses. Electric motors are classified as DC, AC inductive, and synchronous with stepper motors being a subset in the synchronous classification. Research of synchronous motor concepts is ongoing because of relatively recent transistor developments and because of un-conserved energy considerations.

No further debate is offered whether the hydrologic rain cycle is a highly inefficient thermodynamic cycle or and cycle producing relative minuscule amounts of free energy from elevation differences between heat sources and sinks. Rather the cycle reactions are only asserted to be buoyant, partial pressure, reactions with differing buoyant forces on liquid and vapor water. The cycle’s utility may also be limited to novelty as applied to the likes of Sullivan’s dippy bird toy. With little demonstrated utility, potential for the example technologies to be applied to a practical energy producing machine should be minimal. However, the example apparent free energy reactions can be collectively compared to conserved energy reactions with hope of defining free energy principles that can be applied to other technologies.

Expectations are low that any correlated principles, equations, or computer models will ever validate the existence of free energy. Several patents have been issued for magnetic technology motors and generators that were expected to validate free energy. In some cases computer modeling had supported validation but some reactions defied full explanation. The potential for a practical free energy machine may be quite high for magnetic and conserved momentum reactions where absolute conservation of energy may not be the rule. Of course only a fully working model realizing the potential will meet requirements to validate the existence of free energy.

• CORRELATED PRINCIPLES - Attributes of the Rain Cycle are compared to Thermodynamic Cycles. Four fundamental differences are noted and deemed Principles.

• The CAM/CoE CYCLE - The Four Principles are applied to angular momentum reactions where angular momentum rather than energy may be conserved. A theoretical model simulates Tidal Locking, an effect causing nearly every moon in our solar system to have synchronized orbital rotation and spin. Applying the Tidal Locking effect to the model seems to create a free energy cycle.

• MAGNETIC DEVICES - A good portion of pioneer free energy research is in the field of magnetics. Patented devices and functional models are evaluated using the four principles.

• The COGGER - A Class III solenoid demomstrating discontinuity in the energy curve of synchronous motors and generators.