PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki -- your publicly editable site about new energy technologies. Power to the people!

Site:LRP:Central Banks, International Banks and The World Bank

From PESWiki

by Leslie R. Pastor [Central, International & World Banks: Managers of the Control Paradigm]

Back in 1999, after I had finally made contact with Dr. Antony C. Sutton, first via an initial phone call, then via subsequent emails, I decided to send him my own personal verification of his tremendous research. I had been an avid reader of most of his work, from West Tech to his initial phamplets on the RTA Inc. We both referred to my verification as the “April 26th package.”

From: Asu2431426@aol.com
To: l.pastor@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: "April 26th package"
Date: Monday, May 03, 1999 1:14 PM

Les

Very impressive. You have expanded and deepened the research….obviously the control effort continues. However the risks for the US are greater today than in 1918 or 1933…I could name several scenarios where the idiot bankers will get wiped out….and the rest of us too. Some involve Tesla and other new technologies (simple and too effective). Some involve geopolitical balance……

All best, Tony.

On the following day I received a second email, and a second accolade from Dr. Sutton, but with an interesting caveat and an even more interesting revelation.

From: Asu2431426@aol.com
To: l.pastor@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: "April 26th package"
Date: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 9:36 AM

Les

It’s an A except that you missed an important link………

Karl Marx and Frederic Engels were financed by Philadelphia bankers…. Das Kapital was a contract book and plagerized from an earlier book by a French socialist………..[Victor Considerant] Letters from the courier (Philadelphia-Brussels) still exist.

Karl Marx was protected. His father-in-law was the Prussian Minister of the Interior. Engels had independent financing from the family cotton mills in Lancashire.

So Yale Skull & Bones and Karl Marx came from the same cradle….. Hegelianism was all the rage in 1830’s Germany. Bingo.

When you consider that OSS/CIA were heavily staffed from Yale/Princeton their biased analysis are explainable…..they would never employ a Tony Sutton. I used to kid Al Belmont that the bureau would never employ me either……his answer was to the effect, “we have people like you but we keep them in the back room.”

This distinction can become important. A Hegelian can never understand 4-Space and that has extraordinary implication for the future of this country. Good example is Robert Park……….a frothing opponent of cold fusion.

Tony.

Most individuals have little or limited understanding regarding banking, or for that matter, money and/or finance. They never equate banking with politics or with social engineering. To be more precise, the only reference most people have regarding banking is bill paying, home mortgage payments, or attempting to acquire a loan for either business ventures or consolidation of bills into one easy payment.

All banks belong to a hierarchy of centralized control, with authority coming from a Central Bank, usually created by national governments, who provide a national charter, and are thereby given absolute power over the money supply of that nation’s economy.

But what most people do not realize is that the 'monetary system' of these central banks, ultimately control the destiny of their nation’s resources and they do this by 'monetizing debt' out of the very currency that is circulated as money enabling them to transact business in their daily lives. Each monetary unit that they spend is actually a debt instrument, which never gets repaid, for if it did, then the money supply of that nation would no longer exist, and the country would ultimately be impoverished. Money therefore is ultimately a ‘control’ paradigm.

For the purposes of clarification and to provide the appropriate documentation sustaining the argument of the ‘control’ paradigm nature of the banking fraternity, only those aspects of historical significance will be addressed in this presentation.

The money supply as it was originally structured and currently operates is essentially a negative infinity algorithm. And thus can never benefit those that use this system. The insidious nature of this type of system is deliberately hidden from the governments who use this system, and the very people who are bound to its method of silent confiscation. A debt instrument is de facto an obligation to repay value for value, but where there is no value given, then only confiscation remains ultimately the result. If one were to extinguish the debt, (Federal Reserve Notes) then, those FRNs (being the actual currency in circulation) would also be extinguished, thus eliminating all money in circulation. This is known as ‘monetized debt.’ President Lincoln during the American Civil War authorized the Treasury of the United States to issue $450 million ‘green backs’ and placed them in circulation as ‘currency,’ thus enabling him to wage war with the South free of debt. Lincoln was exercising his authority under Article 2, of the Constitution of the United States. The U.S. Congress decided to give their U. S. Constitutional right away to a privately established, governmentally approved, banking authority known as the Federal Reserve System, on December 23rd, 1913, thus ending the U.S. Government’s authority and obligation under Article 1. Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution.

The Truth About Fiat Money And GOLD COINS

http://www.liberty-watch.com/volume03/issue08/coverstory.php

Antony C. Sutton’s revelation regarding the funding of Karl Marx by Philadelphia Bankers was an intriguing revelation, setting me upon an interesting path of research, culminating in subsequent linkage to Carroll Quigley’s personal account regarding International Bankers in his revealing book, Tragedy and Hope (http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119975.pdf). Quigley is important not just because of his revelations, but because of his subsequent influence upon the presidency of the United States, via his former student William Jefferson Clinton. Quigley was the consummate insider, with a knowledgebox most historians lack. His revelations within ‘Tragedy and Hope (http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119975.pdf),’ provided an insider’s view of how international bankers manipulated ‘world events’ and directed ‘historical’ factors like marionettes on a world stage. All that was needed now to link all of these revealing ‘dots of data’ was a significant ‘marionette’ role player demonstrating how the ultimate ‘control’ paradigm carried out its objectives and intent.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." Carroll Quigley, "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time," Macmillan Company, New York, 1966, p.324. (http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119975.pdf)

To begin with, Antony C. Sutton's revelation regarding the funding of Karl Marx work: 'The Communist Manifesto' by Philadelphia Bankers comes from an interesting and significant source:

"The evidence for this twist in modern history has been ignored by modern historians although the documents authenticated by Library of Congress and other sources have been available for some 30 years."

"It is extraordinary that the first academics to report this source of financing for Marx was writing in French, not English! It was a French book by Georges Blond entitled: "Histoire de la Filibuste" that contains the remarkable story of Karl Marx as a friend of a Jean Laffite the pirate who "financed the printing of the Manifesto of the Communist Party." Where did Blond get his information? It originated in two (2) privately printed books published in New Orleans by Stanley Clisby Arthur, "Jean Laffite, The Gentleman Rover" and "The Journal of Jean Laffite." These two (2) books contain original documents describing meetings between Marx and Laffite and the method used to finance the Manifesto."

Dr. Sutton quells the skepticism of his detractors, by further stating, that Jean Laffite did not die in 1823 as alleged by the Encyclopedia Britannica, (they are wrong according to Dr. Sutton, as on many other points)

"Laffite went underground about 1820 and lived a long and exciting life as courier for American bankers and businessmen."

"Laffite’s courier and underground work for American bankers is noted in "The Journal:

"We employed four men as secret officers to spy and report every pertinent conversation and to make verbal reports about any new happenings. We carried out our secret missions very well. We had only two ships operating under private contract with banking interests in Philadelphia. We decided, and took our oath, never to visit saloons or travel the same route twice, or ever go back to Louisiana, Texas or Cuba or any of the Spanish speaking countries"

In the same Journal under date of April 24, 1848 we find the note:

"My interviews were brief, but direct. I lived at the home of Mr. Louis Bertillon in Paris and sometimes hotels. I met Mr. Michel Chevreul, Mr. Louis Braille, Mr. Augustin Thierry, Mr. Alexis de Tocqueville, Mr. Karl Marx, Mr. Frederic Engels, Mr. Daguerre and many others."

Then Laffite goes on to the eye-opening statement:

"Nobody knew the real facts about my mission in Europe. I opened an account in a bank in Paris, a credit in escrow to finance two young men, Mr. Marx and Mr. Engel to help bring about the revolution of working men of the world. They are now working at it."

"The second source of American financing for Karl Marx came from Charles Anderson Dana, Editor of the New York Tribune owned by Horace Greeley. Dana hired Marx to write for the New York Tribune. This Marx did, in over 500 articles spread over ten years from 1851 to 1861."

"Marx’s prime source of German funds came from his associate Frederic Engels, son of a wealthy Bremen cotton manufacturer and subsidy provider to Marx for many years. Additional subsidy was provided by the Prussian elite". Marx married Jenny von Westphalen, and thus was amply rewarded for his work by the Prussian nobility.

Why? "Because the entire Marxist philosophy is aimed at extermination of the "middle class" and the supremacy of the elite. Marxism is a device for consolidating power by the elite. It has nothing to do with relieving the misery of the poor or advancing mankind: it is an elitist political device pure and simple." [Antony C. Sutton: The Federal Reserve Conspiracy: Karl Marx and His Manifesto: pp. 41-46]

Others have furthered Antony C. Sutton's research regarding the objectives:

http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm

Britain’s control is strongly alluded to by Carroll Quigley, "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early sixties, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown., and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." [Tragedy and Hope, p. 950]

Carroll Quigley’s book, "Tragedy and Hope," essentially outlines for us, the hidden agenda of the banking fraternity, essentially, control of international commerce, regulation of international ‘monetary policy,’ and ultimately the structuring of balance of payments and debt refinancing, utilizing both ‘hegelian’ and ‘machiavelian’ methodologies. Quigley demonstrates quite clearly J. P. Morgan’s proclivity of controlling both sides of international disputes, as well as domestically intervening in a nation’s political policy, via their control (financing) of all political parties.

Lindsay Williams in his revealing book: "The Non-Energy Crisis (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Energy_Non-Crisis)," demonstrates that it was not the oil companies, but the World Bank, that determined and actually regulated the pricing structure of the global oil markets. He makes significant comments regarding the direct influence of the World Bank and the IMF in a Video (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Energy_Non-Crisis) presentation. His revelation is significant, when you factor in the goal of the banking fraternity to ultimately do away with the US Dollar and present the Amero as the currency of the Western Hemisphere. An important point regarding the oil in Alaska, is that none of it comes to the United States. All of it goes to China and Japan, currently, some 15-20 billion barrels of oil thus far. Both China and Japan hold significant amounts of US Treasury Bonds and Bills amounting in the trillions of dollars.

John Perkins (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251) reveals his role as a professional economic hit man in his revealing book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (http://www.economichitman.com/). While he (http://www.johnperkins.org/) states that there was no global conspiracy to create a world empire from his activities, he has left out a very important point regarding all economic systems. Control of all such systems ultimately comes under the control of an ‘evil entourage’ regardless of the best of intentions of its originators.

This statement is not as remarkable as you might expect, for it is generally a standard operational process of decay within all systems or processes in business. When the Marsh (http://www.snappleandnyc.com/aboutsnap.php) Brothers sold their rights to Snapple, they gave up control of the ‘content’ of their former beverage. The new owners wishing to ‘capitalize’ on their goal of expanding Snapple’s market base, decided to change the ingredients, substituting sugar, and adding high fructose corn syrup, thus altering the taste of the product, and a significant portion of their former customers. When Home Depot was sold by its former owners, their strategy of providing quality help via actual in-store professional plumbers, electricians, carpenters, as customer care employees was eliminated by the new owners, who decided that such services were no longer needed, and that by eliminating those kinds of professional ‘employees,’ would contribute to the bottom line, thus contributing ultimately in poorer quality service, ultimately affecting customer satisfaction. When Borders decided to remove older employees from their workforce, and to modify the in-store seating policy of allowing their customers to become comfortable, pre-examination of their books and magazines, they also affected their customer base.

Most people who work for corporations go along to get along, they never expect radicalism nor anticipate an ‘evil entourage’ preempting a status quo and substituting ‘generally accepted standards of quality control,’ for autocratic ‘dictatorship,’ thus altering the actual foundational principles. The world has been this way since the beginning of creation, and apparently will remain this way, until those who “go along in order to get along,” ultimately realize that they have a responsibility to actually ‘participate’ in the fruition of their organizations and save it from ultimate decay and deviation. This applies to all governments as well, I might add.

[edit]