PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki -- your publicly editable site about new energy technologies. Power to the people!

Directory:Superrelativity

From PESWiki

The Theory Of Super Relativity: Super Relativity , SuperRelativity.org (http://www.superrelativity.org/html/sitemap.html)

A meta-theoretical analysis on combining particle physics with real world phenomena Physcom (http://physcom.awardspace.com)

Taken from:

A meta-theoretical analysis on combining particle physics with real world phenomena

Physcom (http://physcom.awardspace.com)

Intro:

PESwiki water as a fuel intro (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO0G-gUfxGk)

The incredible garbage shrinking machine (http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-02-26-hot-garbage_x.htm), introducing magnecules (http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0112066)

Videos

These and more videos available @ Physcom Videos (http://physcom.awardspace.com/#Videos)

Water into fuel (http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=wqtmJXsG-uI)

Dean Kamen's Water Distiller (http://gizmodo.com/370698/colbert-first-vid-of-dean-kamens-miracle-water-distiller) (vapor compression distiller)

Joe Cell (http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=c-ulOvJl46U)

GEET fuel processor (http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=hlrxueyulPc)

Nuclear Transmutation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMFvzohuVew)

Analysis

This release mentioned below specifically concerns the discovery and retro-engineering of specialised theoretical physics. The purpose here was to make a physical approach possible of by the scientific mass as ‘unexplainable and unimitably' considered phenomena. Before, phenomena like immediate allergies, vortices and cars running on HHO or on self-sustaining metastable OH could not yet be accounted for. Other constitutions of nature like supposed unexplainable cases of homeopathy, controversial magnecules and perceived 'undeterminable' electromagnetic waves in general are also in this list. For some ideas on what also exists/existed outthere I gladly refer you to the videos and links below, the PESwiki and also to the nice website from rocket scientist Frank Germano. (mirror).(opens new window) The article conveys a new method for analysing and explaining a part of physics and it may seem unfamiliar at first. This is mainly because of the side effects of any more pronounced theory. Further investigation will suggest and fulfill viability, validity and measurability.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, "hmm.... that's funny...."

- Isaac Asimov.

As a result of an article concerning energy and trusting Bruno's (zero-point measurer) wisdom/intuition I have contracted a weeks-long fight with the standardmodel of Physics. This did not provide to be very difficult since there are many, almost mainstream, models that conflict and differentiate within themselves and each other. As an admirer of theoretical physics and theoretical astrophysics I had, however, picked up things with self-study and in the scientific direction of the middle school. Everything seemed natural until during the lesson chemistry the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg entered. Either the speed, or the place. It seemed an important, yet abstract term. Core fission seemed promising at the time. I thought that Heisenberg=Bohr=Atom=atomsplicing=modern technology. I can imagine that I was not alone.

Now what proves to be, they were already splitting atoms before Bohr and Heisenberg(=quantum) wrote about it. (Curie a.o.) It was therefore in short a descriptive and not a prescriptive analysis. To analyse the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg I have been drawn to one of the senior and most wise of all, Einstein. His work is meanwhile just like quantummechanics experimentally proven valuable.

To unite the theories although, has been proven to be, after many years' research through 10 dimensions gone by, fruitless. The problem for this is two-piece:

1. Quantummechanics is an approximation of reality, whereas Einstein’s General Relativity is a theory/law concerning reality. You cannot get from a descriptive analysis of reality to a prescriptive analysis.

2. There is an important methodological mistake that has been made at theorising by Einstein when he said: We cannot detect an aether in a gaseous form, therefore it probably does not exist. He was only partly right.

These two reservations do exist, therefore the standardphysics have not succeeded in forming a coherent connection between the theories. Physicists and mathematicians went of it that one had to start from quantumtheory (very good foreseeability) what led to exorbitant propositions (I have once attended a speech of Stephen Hawking concerning his planes (superstring dimensions) but there could not be tied an end to his physical properties for his mathematical characteristics. Now I know why.)

Of the string came the superstring (sexy!) with accompanying gravity and supergravity. Now that all sounds, cool, however I was in search of answers, damnit, and every theory finished again with problems along all sides. Einstein's last words were thus: “ Every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows what a photon is, but they are mistaken.”

Quantummechanics had given us little in specific prescribed revolutionary products, except for quantumencryption that is just computercode and quantumcomputers which don’t exist. Whereas my growing view, and that of the scientists working on the hereafter mentioned finished products, was that there were definitely new fields of thought possible; including but not limited to: the MIT Plasma Fuel Reformer, the Gliding Arc Fuel Reformer, most definitely the Water Distiller (guest appearance on The Colbert Report 03.24.2008), Toxic Decomposition, introducing magnegases, the Vortex Heat Changer, and last but not least the Joe Cell, all similar OxyHydrogen/HHO products and purported real cold fusion between rods in ²H. The latter explains in full detail their connection.

All of the still unexplained phenomena on the other hand required some kind of electrical theory. But where current explanations were all embedded in old aether theory, this could not be permitted by physicists and quantumphysicists around the world, more specific because of the Michelson-Morley experiment wich says some things about light, the observer thereof and subsequently does deny any aether, where light (http://searchwarp.com/swa95331.htm) itself is not part of the electromechanics.

Einstein's view of 'quantum entanglement' as spooky action at a distance, along with the problems in QM with the measurement of "tachyons", "gravitational waves" and "dark matter", allowed me to think about the etymology of the word ' super ' in the previous brainteasers. This meant here: " brought in agreement with (other theories.)" Assuming that the development of a theory of the reality has stopped at the ‘General Relativity’ of Einstein, which was apparently the breaking point from a true deterministic viewpoint; I put my senses on a super-relativity theory. My search through Wikipedia was, although very educational, unfortunately at its end. With no conclusive information. Somewhat bewildered I tried Google. Yep, it stood there; under http://www.superrelativity.org

Mark Fiorentino, a top software engineer at IBM, parttime theoretical physicist, and allround awarded troubleshooter, in whose foot tracks i could step, had done where every other theorist until now had not succeeded in. His work is only since 2006 partly concluded. He had devoted more than 20 years of his life to the subject and they are currently laying the last hands on his all encompassing book, with a reference system. His model should finally unite Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla. And explain magnegases and OH- at the same time.

So this is therefore the coming scientific revolution where Bruno and others intuitively spoke about. It is clear that a better model of reality can give us new possibilities. And could reconcile new and old things with each other. Such as explaining: all atomic forces, all magnetic forces, cycles and perhaps eventually explaining even more than that; therefore everyone who is interested in geometry or nature, it is not too complicated, please visit http://www.superrelativity.org. I hope that you enjoyed my release from the eyes of a communication scientist;

I would like to thank my scientist friends for their endurance in my struggle through the jungle that is Theoretical Physics, including Gert Aerts, Physics Teacher and Master; Stoffel Janssens, Doctorandus in Chemistry; and JC, Nuclear Engineer, Doctorandus. This would not have been possible without all your constructive support. Lastly, I would like to thank Caroline Thompson, for her work on ‘loopholes’ in Bell’s Theorem Inequality Violations. May she rest in peace.

For some more information visit:

From Physcom: Learn-it-yourself (http://physcom.awardspace.com/#Learn-it-yourself)

http://www.waterfuelconverters.com/ (consortium to determine brownsgas)

http://www.brownsgas.com/ (company)

http://www.magnegas.com/ (plasma arc tech)

http://www.hadronicpress.com

http://www.frank.germano.com, (Tesla & Schauberger)

I would like to thank my scientist friends for their endurance in my struggle through the jungle that is Theoretical Physics, including Gert Aerts, Physics Teacher and Master; Stoffel Janssens, Doctorandus in Chemistry; and JC, Nuclear Engineer;. This would not have been possible without all your constructive support. Lastly, I would like to thank Caroline Thompson, for her work on ‘loopholes’ in Bell’s Theorem Inequality Violations. May she rest in peace.

Benny Creemers

Communication Scientist

VUB Brussel

Disclaimer: This is the theoretical and practical field as it stands. It does not prove zero-point, as zero-point is only a quantified description. I did not just stumble on the forementioned website. I did not follow a link. These people have nothing to do with the theory. Worse than that, most, if not all, don’t even know how it does work exactly. I went through a thought experiment. A habit of which I can surely recommend.

Bibliography

For an updated bibliography, please visit Physcom Bibliography (http://physcom.awardspace.com/#Bibliography)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clerk_Maxwell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Schauberger

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli, Thermodynamics, Hadronic Press

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyhydrogen (OH-, operational for lengthy periods without contact to current)(see DIY joe cell)

Longitudinal waves in ultracold plasma Harvard presentation (.realvideo) on 'mysterious' modes in cold plasma

Transmutation of radioactive waste into non-radioactive waste electrodes, accelerated, without fast neutrons (operational)

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/rd/R&D100.pdf The reverse vortex plasma reformer (operational)