PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki -- your publicly editable site about new energy technologies. Power to the people!





Directory:Elemental Rod Generator

From PESWiki

900W generator displayed in ERR Co.'s brochure.
900W generator displayed in ERR Co.'s brochure.

Two rods. One is composed of 73 elements, and the other, with 74 elements. An electrical charge apparently builds up in one of the rods because of this difference, creating enough potential to generate electricity continously. This charge is alleged to be a function of neutrinos striking differentially.

The solid state function of the generator is similar to a solar photovoltaic panel, except that no light exposure is required. The device will allegedly generate electricity 24/7, regardless of temperature, light, wind and other environmental variables.

Table of contents

About

This is a new page!
This is a new technology-related article needing expansion. You can help PESWiki by expanding it and are invited to help us add to its contents.
After logging in, click the "edit" link above. Further information might be found in a section of the talk page. Please remove this message once the page has become more mature and adequately developed.

Official Website

none?

How it Works

Most likely, it doesn't. This device makes claims for neutrinos that are directly invalidated by what is known about this class of sub-atomic particle. The claim is that a charge builds on one rod, relative to the other(s), because of "neutrinos striking differentially". This is, of course, nonsense. There are two fundamental reasons why this is the case.


The Weak Nuclear Force

Neutrinos only interact with matter via the weak nuclear force or gravity (not relevant to this application).

The range of weak nuclear interactions is very small (around 1000 times smaller than an atomic nucleus) enabling neutrinos to pass through vast amounts of matter unhindered. In fact the earth is bathed in a flux of solar (electron) neutrinos. The overwhelming majority of these pass through the earth and all things on it (including us) without interating with matter at all.

The claim, therefore, that these small rods could be subject to significant numbers of neutrino interactions is plainly false.

No Electromagnetic Interaction

Because they are not electrically charged they are not subject to the electromagnetic force and so do not cause ionisation of matter. So neutrino strikes cannot lead to a build up of charge, even if they were frequent enough; which they are not.

Videos


(2.3 minutes)

  • free energy elemental rod generator video 1 - This machine consists of just two rods of each slightly different elements, and provides power day and night by completely unknown means. (Google Video (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-635987818295327978); July 2, 2006)

- - - -


(2.3 minutes)

  • free energy elemental rod generator video 2 - This machine consists of just two rods of each slightly different elements, and provides power day and night by completely unknown means. (Google Video (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4298347669641896403); July 2, 2006)

Independent Testing

list here

Patents

list here

Profiles

Company: ERR Co.

??

Inventor:

??

James B. Schwartz

Coverage

In the News

list here

Other Coverage

"Nutrino circuit consists of two rods about 3 inches long (see the first picture below). The device consists of the two posts, a wooden base, two terminals and a switch. One of the rods consists of 73 elements and the other rod contains 74. The earth is stuck by particles from space all the time called nutrinos. When nutrinos strike one of the rods it causes a negative charge to build up. The second picture to the shows three Christmas tree lights being illuminated by the rods. These rods put out about 18 watts of power. This device has been used to charge batteries in a cave hundreds of feet below the ground."

Comments

See Discussion page

Probable Toxicity

On Dec. 9, 2007, New Energy Congress member, Ken Rauen wrote:

If there are 74 elements present in one of the two rods as mentioned, there will likely be exotic and toxic components. Toxicity is not always elemental in nature; compounds of an element determine the toxicity in almost every case. Plutonium is an example of toxicity despite its chemical nature. Many elements that are known to be toxic might not be in this device, depending upon how it is formed.

Composition?

On Dec. 9, 2007, John Aspray wrote:

I think maybe that one rod is Tantulum carbide, the other Tungsten carbide.

Related Technologies

Contact

See http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1723.30.html

ERR Co.
2-11-18, Tomioka, Kohtoh-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Phone: 03-3630-1901 (Japan)
Fax: 03-3630-1905 (Japan)

See also

- Other Directory listingsLatestA-IJ-RS-ZTreeNews
- PESWiki home page

Related
Advertisement