PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki:  Finding and facilitating breakthrough clean energy technologies.







    

Directory:Daniel Quale Lenzless Generator

From PESWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Page first featured March 9, 2009

Daniel Quale claims to have come up with an electric generator that is unaffected by Lenz's Law. According to the site, this type of generator should be capable of overunity. It is very easy to turn. The output or load cannot cause the generator to become harder to turn. Experiments show no measurable inductive drag. The inductors are actually repelled by the coils. This causes the inductors to flex as the rotor turns. Flexing of the inductors is the only negative action during operation. This is easily fixed with non-magnetic rigid discs to support the inductors.

Contents

Official Websites


Videos

<object width="480" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/--SpdiJEmeo?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/--SpdiJEmeo?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="390"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/--SpdiJEmeo?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/--SpdiJEmeo?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="390"></embed></object>


<object width="480" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/0ovIydwyW70?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/0ovIydwyW70?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="390"></embed></object>


(5.09 Minutes)

  • LENZLESS GENERATOR 2 BEST VERSION another demonstration of the LENZLESS GENERATOR invented by DAN QUALE more info at www.overunitybuilder.com Also see newer videos with new coils lighting 50 LEDS Meters don't show output well from this generator because of low speed. (YouTube; July 26, 2008)

- - - -

(7.06 Minutes)

  • LENZLESS GENERATOR FEB15 2009 LIGHTS 200 LEDS MY LENZLESS GENERATOR LIGHTING 200 LEDS SHOWING ABOUT 1.8VOLTS AND 48MA CURRENT THAT IS STEPPED UP BY TRANSFORMER TO POWER 200 LEDS (YouTube; February 15, 2009)

- - - -

(4.02 Minutes)

  • FIRST LENZLESS GENERATOR PROTOTYPE MY FIRST LENZLESS GENERATOR PROTOTYPE MORE INFO AT www.overunitybuilder.comS (YouTube; August 02, 2008)

- - - - <object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4D8YYpZAwE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4D8YYpZAwE&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object> This is a device that is something that can be used to create magnetic powered devices.

Research and Development

Patent application filed June 12, 2008

(0.21 Minutes)

  • Lenz's Law This is a short animation which depicts Lenz's Law and how changing magnetic flux creates an induced current. (YouTube; December 09, 2007)

- - - -

Patents

Patent application filed June 12, 2008

Politics

"Finally, now I see what drawing it is that you mean. Wow I was wrong. I am sorry I did not look closely at this drawing before! I thought you had magnets in the middle there. But that was a different version i was looking at. Well i owe you many apologies. Yes I apologize! I will remove all negative remarks e-mails etc. Very soon, on my website and YouTube. I guess the only difference between yours and my designs is that of magnetic field orientation (unless you can show me otherwise). I now will probably only get one single claim on my patent unless you can show me where you disclosed repelling fields. I really am sorry! I didn't look closely at that drawing. I thank you for being persistent and getting me to look at this so, I am going to offer you a compromise now. If you didn't disclose the repelling fields concept as i show on my website, i will consider you a co-inventor and share any patent or license proceeds 50-50 with you however I still believe I have improved on your concept and found the best magnetic configuration that will be the only patentable claim left. You told people to face n to s with the coils between as stated below. This magnetic orientation makes all the difference. My (repelling) (n-n or s-s) orientation works great. Something that is an improvement to your design here. You never revealed a repelling field configuration did you? "
  • http://www.overunitybuilder.com/francouer.html - Alan Francoeur alleges that Daniel Quale has stolen these ideas from him and fraudulently claimed them as his own. Francoeur does not seem to take into consideration the possibility that Daniel might have come up with them on his own, and that this helps validate Francoeur's work.
Danie Quale writes , I don't think that my work validates his work since my generator apparently 

works better than his did and mine is truly a Lenzless generator,

his was definitely not LENZLESS!

Daniel Quale writes:

"IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT MY DESIGN IS SIMILAR TO ALAN FRANCOEUR'S "Interference Disc Alternator" OF CANADA. FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT DIFERENCES SUCH AS MY USE OF REPELLING RING MAGNETS TO ELIMINATE THE DRAG. NOT BY BALANCING ATTRACTION FORCES LIKE HIS. GO TO THE PAGE LINK BELOW FOR MORE INFO AND TO SEE SOME VERY INTERESTING HATE-MAILS.

OK, so what's next? Spread this web page to as many university physics and electrical engineering dept. heads, free energy groups and web sites, manufacturing companies and anyone else that you think might be able to help bring this to market. I might sell the patent rights or form a corporation to help develop and market it myself. This is a real tested device. It does work. It can change our planet's energy future. Don't let them bury this one!"


Saturday, February 7, 2009 1:08 PM
From: "al.f" <al.f@telus.net>
To: alfenergy@yahoogroups.com, magnetomaniac@yahoo.com
Subject: "Fraud and intellectual theft of the concepts in the interference disc generator
There has been a heated exchange with many emails between myself and Daniel Quale because of my complaint against him and his intulectual theft of the concepts I made public years ago for humanity and all good people. Not all here posted here but below is some of the exchanges.
Fraud and intellectual theft of the concepts in the interference disc generator by Daniel Quale magnetomaniac@yahoo.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=wmykNgq9OxI
I have made contact and am sending a formal complaint in writing under the heading 'PROTEST' to the US patent office because this fraudster Daniel Quale has applied for a patent on concepts I made into the public domain years ago for humanity.
Daniel Quale has taken the concepts I developed of a stationary ring magnets and stationary ring coils with a rotating disc with blocking fins and applied for a US patent.. He cannot patent this concept because I already conceved invented and developed this technology many years before the internet was created and I made it public domain for humanity. This technologu is for humanity and all good people, not for fraudsters like Daniel Quale to steal it and claim it as their own and then deny and hide my prior art from the patent office to decieve the US patent office and everyone else who sees the utube video or his web site. http://www.overunitybuilder.com/
He is decieving the US patent office by not tell them of my prior art and technology that he is attempting to patent and steal for his own personal gains and so I made contact with the patent office and they gave me the proper instructions to get them the information they requested and this I have done..
Let it be known to everyone and I will say it again. I gave my earlier interference disc generator concepts for all honest and good people for humanity, not for frauster profeteers who only want to steal it and boost their name on my exspense and many years of very hard work.
Alan Francoeur
The original inventor.
BC, Canada."

Daniel Quale Writes: I want to set the record straight. Mr Francoeur has accused me of fraud and attempted fraud. I do not like accusations by someone who is trying to disparage my reputation. I came up with my design without ever knowing about his design. I started with the concept of using repelling fields and diverting them alternately to produce electricity. Although my final version resembles physically Mr. Francoeur's design, the field orientation that I use"North to North: or "South to South" works better than the attraction "North to South" he uses. Mine results in an alternating field in the output coils. {Reversing the field in a coil results in greater output voltage than a varying field given the same parameters.} His is subject to a great deal of magnetic drag which must be overcome with a great deal input torque. My design using the ring magnets has NO magnetic drag at any time.ZERO DRAG! What other generator has no drag at any time? Mine also exhibits a positive motor effect causing the unit to speed up when current is drawn from the coils. The generator spins freely loaded or not to begin with. What this means is that my design can be built to become a self runner someday. I have had a Chinese company professionally build a replica and they have verified the speeding up under load effect. What Mr. Francoeur seems to ignore is the difference in our designs. This difference is as important as what polarity of DC current is to most electric DC circuits. It works one way and not the other. I believe that the reason Mr. Francoeur would rather spend time trying to divert everyone's attention away from this difference is that it would expose the fact of the poor performance of his design and that he is trying to hide this obvious fact. I believe that he never thought to use the repelling field orientation like I began with, and spent years without ever trying it. This may be embarrassing to him as one would expect. If I had spent all those years and money without seeing that you could orient the fields to repel each other and eliminate the drag and get good output, I would feel pretty foolish myself. This I believe is the source of Mr. Francoeur's pain and embarrassment and therefore the reason for his hatred of me and my success with the LENZLESS GENERATOR. His design apparently was never easy to turn, as can be seen in his posts, trying to balance the drag forces and his comments on the heat produced by the motor driving it, then proposing to recycle the heat from the motor!! Give me a break! For him to claim that my design is his, is like saying that he invented the internal combustion engine but couldn't find what to fuel it with, and then myself finding out what fuel to use. I can't think of a closer analogy, sorry. What I wish everyone would recognize is that Mr. Francoeur's failure with his design, and his complaining, has hurt my efforts at getting people to realize that MY LENZLESS GENERATOR is really a great generator design that can result in free-energy. If Mr. Francoeur ever gets over his pain and embarrassment of his failure and helps to point out the difference in public forums, and that this difference makes mine a GREAT generator design, then maybe he could help promote something that he has only hindered up to now. I call on Mr. Francoeur to admit publicly his failure and endorse my improvement to his physical concept the Interference Generator. This would go a long way to correcting what is truly a developing tragedy, if my design merely gets dismissed as a remake of his failed design. I had a lot of people on Youtube comment that my design was nothing new and how bad the design was, and I believe that it was because of their knowing about the poor performance of Mr. Francoeur's design. Viewers of my videos would assume that it was the same as his and comment on how that design never put out much and that Mr. Francoeur spent years unsuccessfully on it. His decision finally to give up and give the design to the world is on the internet, stating that he hoped someone would improve on the design someday. Well that day came and he reacted badly because I did not credit him. That was because I saw only his disc design with holes when I researched his name, after someone pointed out the resemblance to his design on a youtube post. It was only after he kept trying to get me to see his design by emailing me everything at once and not merely emailing the pertinent files. He buried me with so much that I couldn't see what he was trying to show me. Finally he got the message that I wanted only the relevant files, not his entire life's work, was I able to see his design and was able to end the heated exchange of e-mails. Well I have acknowledged his prior art on my website and to the US patent office. I have done what is right all along. I have not tried to deceive anyone. I am a real scientific researcher and adhere to the scientific principle of objectivity and honesty in my research. Anyone looking at the depth of my material on my website http://overunitybuilder.com/ can see this. If I am wrong or am proven wrong in the future I will correct it, not deny it. Mr. Francoeur needs to come clean in public. Why no videos of his generator working? Anyone can watch videos of all three of my prototypes and the tests of these. I started out with little output in my early videos and showed my progress as I changed coils and added LEDS and increased the speed of my generator, subsequently, I found that increasing output was possible with higher speeds and lower coil resistance, using larger diameter gauge wire. I put my development on youtube at each stage, showing my progress. I am currently trying to get help with building a better unit from a university group. Mr. Francoeur needs to stop accusing me of copying his work and accept the fact that I did something that improved on his design without his assistance or of the knowledge of his original design. I hope that this is all I need to say about this matter. But if Mr. Francoeur or anyone else for that matter thinks that they deserve credit for my work, I will also address them in the future. In any case if anyone wishes to assist with promoting a design that could be the answer to our energy problem that we all seek, then please help in any way you can, start by going to my website and spend time learning about the technology first, then contact me. Sincerely Dan Quale 12/25/2009 UPDATE APRIL 15 2014 > I AM STILL WAITING FOR MR. FRANCOEUR TO SHOW A VIDEO OF HISS GENERATOR RUNNING WITH OUTPUT AND INPUT READINGS AS I WISH TO POINT OUT THAT MY ANALYSIS OF HIS ,INTERFERENCE GENERATOR, NEEDING A 5 HP MOTOR TO TURN IT VERSUS MINE BEING OPERATED BY A 1.6 WATT TOY MOTOR IS PROOF THAT HIS DESIGN IS VERY DIFFERENT AND PROVES HIS DESIGN WAS SERIOUSLY FLAWED AND HIS OBJECTIONS TO MY DESIGN, HIGHLIGHT THE REAL REASON FOR HIS ATTACKING ME, THAT BEING THE CONTRAST BETWEEN THE TWO DESIGNS WHICH HE SEEMS TO BE DESPERATE TO HIDE. WHY NO PUBLIC VIDEO OF HIS GENERATOR? COME CLEAN MR. FRANCOEUR FESS UP REITERATE YOUR REASON FOR ABANDONING YOUR DESIGN SHOW A VIDEO THAT DEMONSTRATES THAT IT PRODUCES ANY ELECTRICITY. SINCERELY DAN QUALE APRIL 15, 2014 STOP THE EMAIL THREATS.

In the News

list here

Discussion

See Discussion page

Contact

Daniel Quale

E-Mail: magnetomaniac@yahoo.com

See also


BEST

ENERGY TYPES

DEVICE TYPES

Personal tools

Departments
Sponsored Links

Support
Toolbox