Directory:Bedini SG:Replications:PES:Sterling Allan:Data:Exp6:Charts
From PESWiki
Shortcut URL for this page: http://tinyurl.com/4zc62
You are here: PES Network (http://pureenergysystems.com) > PESWiki > Directory > Bedini SG > Replications > PES > Sterling D. Allan > Data > Experiment 6 > Charting Ohms Versus Amps
EXPERIMENT 6 -- OHMS VERSUS AMPS
This is Page 2 of the Experiment 6 report. See Page 1.
Graphs pertaining to data from Sterling D. Allan's sixth series of experiments on his first Replication of John Bedini's "School Girl Radiant Energy Circuit and Motor"
- Identification
- Performed by Sterling D. Allan (http://www.pureenergysystems.com/about/personnel/SterlingDAllan/), Executive Director, PES Network Inc (http://www.pureenergysystems.com/), Oct. 25, 2005, Ephraim, UT USA.
- Purpose
- To profile the relationship of ohms resistance to amps input and output in the Bedini SG, using 6V Panasonic Sealed 4.2 Ah/20 h.
- See: Sterling's data page for index of experiments performed on these batteries using the same device on eight identical (new from manufacturer) batteries.
- Primary Discovery
- "Zero Current" Charge State : In the process of running this experiment, I discovered that there seems to be a region in which output current goes to zero, yet battery charging proceeds. Peter Lindemann says that the higher the frequency the better. Tesla purportely said that "current is wasted energy." So we may have discovered a region in which both ideals are met: high frequency, no current. I have not yet verified that the current is indeed zero. I am only extrapolating based on a graph plotted that appears to go to zero. That curve, incidentally, has two shapes. One is linear and goes to zero, and the other is analogous to the input current curve and approaches but never reaches zero.
Highlights (6V Panasonic Sealed 4.2 Ah/20 h batteries)
- Increased ohms give decreased amps output.
- Increased ohms give increased frequency of vibration of the coil.
- Decreased ohms gives increased rpms in the range where rotation is created
- Solid state (no rotation) resonance begins around 2k ohms.
- Audible resonance occurs between the range of 2.2k ohms and 5k ohms.
- A "no output current" state begins at around 11.5k ohms.
- Reduction of the input voltage shifts the curves to the left.
- The shape of the output current curve has two forms. One extrapolates linearly to zero, the other bends analogously to the input curve, approaching asymptotically but not reaching zero.
- The latter curve is obtained by introducing a high resistance between the negative of the output batteries and the positive of the input batteries prior to connecting the circuit.
Follow-up
- Zero Change Detected in "Zero Current" Bedini Charged Batteries - Extrapolating to a point where output current goes to zero, with high frequency pulsing of the circuit, the expected results were to see super robust batteries. Instead, the load test showed no change. Perhaps different load types respond differently?
| Table of contents |
Experimental Set-up
Batteries
- Panasonic-BSG 4.2Ah/20h sealed lead acid batteries' part number LC-R064R2P (http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?PName?Name=P164-ND&Site=US) from Digikey.com.
Circuit
As described herein.
Set-up
Battery #8 on input. Batteries #4,5,6 on output (receiving charge). Resistor on circuit being modified. Current from input and output batteries being measured with multimeter.
Results
Graph Overviews

0 - 1000 Ohms (x) versus amps (y), plotted on non-logarithmic paper.

0 - 1000 Ohms (x, logarithmic) versus amps (y,left) and rpm (y,right), plotted on semi-logarithmic paper.

2.3k - 5k Ohms (x, logarithmic) versus not pitch, plotted on semi-logarithmic paper (note frequency is logarithmic as well.

2k - 20k Ohms (x, logarithmic) versus amps (y), plotted on semi-logarithmic paper.

2k - 20k Ohms (x, logarithmic) versus amps (y), plotted on semi-logarithmic paper, later, at lower voltage. Noticed two different amperages that give 0.01 amps.
0 - 1000 Ohms Versus Amps and RPM
- Amps input decrease asymptotically as ohms increase.
- RPM increase as ohms decrease. Curve needs more careful data collection and points to determine its exact shape. May have harmonic undulations, may be linear.
- At around 70 ohms, the frictional resistances of the wheel seem to over-ride what would otherwise be further increases in speed.
Ohms to Audible Frequency is a linear relationship
2.3k - 5k Ohms (x, logarithmic) versus not pitch, plotted on semi-logarithmic paper (note frequency is logarithmic as well.
2k to 20k Ohms versus Amps
Two graphs. At the time these were plotted, I was thinking that the point in which 0.0x turned to the next number on the meter, e.g. 0.02 flashing about 50% to 0.01, represented 0.019. However, it is actually the 0.0x5 spot, above which is rounded up, and below which is rounded down. This point was sought as the most accurate point to plot. The variable resistor was adjusted until the toggle point was reached.
So in the graphs below, 0.010 amps is actually, 0.005, etc.
6.45 Volts input
Linear Output Goes to Zero
Note that an extrapolation of the output current line goes to zero at around 11.5k Ohms, which would infer that any charging taking place from input derived from resistances above that would result in a "no current" charge, implicating radiant energy. Such a charge state has been measured, but the "no current" part has not been verified with sufficiently sensitive instruments.
6.27 Volts input
- Reduction of the input voltage shifts the curves to the left (expected).
A smaller size of Batteries would probably also shift the curve to the left?
Curve changes shape
- The shape of the output current curve has two forms. One extrapolates linearly to zero, the other bends analogously to the input curve, approaching asymptotically but not reaching zero.
- In the latter curve, point B is obtained by introducing a high resistance between the negative of the output batteries and the positive of the input batteries prior to connecting the circuit. This was repeated several times to verify the effect, Point A was obtained four times, and point B was obtained twice, using the same procedure for each. (This was discovered by accidentally having the circuit meter set on resistance rather than amps. The meter has a resistance of 4.56 k ohms. [Good thing there wasn't any sizeable current flowing, it could have burned up the meter.])
See also
- Resistor Parameters - From 47 ohms to 20k ohms, the "volume/speed control" for this device, from changing rate of rotation to the frequency of resonance in solid state (no rotation) mode, including an audible frequency range.
- Ohms v Amps v RPM and Multiple Stable Rotation Curves - Sterling's Bedini SG data shows several regions in which two stable rotation speeds are obtained at the same resistance in the Bedini SG circuit. Looking for ideal resistance for running the motor-energizer.
- Zero Change Detected in "Zero Current" Bedini Charged Batteries - Extrapolating to a point where output current goes to zero, with high frequency pulsing of the circuit, the expected results were to see super robust batteries. Instead, the load test showed no change. Perhaps different load types respond differently?
- Experiment 6 - Page one of Experiment 6.
- Sterling D. Allan's Replication - main index; includes chronology of build, other replications by SDA when built.
- Bedini "School Girl" (Simplified) Project
- Replications by Others
- Discussion link for this particular page
- Bedini SG egroup (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bedini_SG)







