PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki: Finding and facilitating breakthrough clean energy technologies.
Donations to PES are needed and greatly appreciated. Thank you.
"HS"'s Replication of an Advanced Variation of John Bedini's Simplified 'School Girl' Motor and Battery Energizer
- Report claims that dead and sulfated batteries were significantly replenished in just 24 hours of exposure to an advanced form of John Bedini's circuit.
Dec. 3, 2004 Report
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:33 PM
Just wanted to let everyone know my experience with an ADVANCED version of the Bedini Schoolgirl motor/energizer. John gave me a schematic a few weeks ago of a device that he said would put the issue of radiant energy battery charging to rest.
Having built several other versions of his devices successfully, I was very excited to receive the schematic. I built the device EXACTLY as John said with ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGES!!!!
The first spin the device spun up to around 800 rpm's on a 22" bicycle wheel; and that's fairly fast. The device achieved resonance and the current drain dropped by about 20%, maintaining the rotation speed, and even got a bit faster.
The input battery was a 12v, 1.2aH battery, and as John suggested, I put 4 on the output side. Within a few minutes, the batteries began to rise in voltage. There has been some big debate for awhile about this "radiant charge" producing only a surface charge on the batteries. Well my friends, this is NO SURFACE CHARGE.
The charge was held for 30 minutes at rest, and when I tested the batteries with the Computerized Battery Analyzer by West Mountain Radio, the batteries produced a steady drain for an extended period, after being previously dead, with readings as low as 8 volts per gel cell. They were NOT charged prior to the test with a conventional charger!!! They were completely dead.
In a conversation with John, we were discussing the issue of larger batteries. I told John that I had 2 garden tractor batteries that were completely sulfated and would NOT take a charge at all with a conventional charger.
Tested with the CBA, the batteries produced 1 amp for less than 1 second. I tried charging the batteries 4 different times with a regular automotive battery charger, first on the 6 amp rate for 6 hours, and then overnight on the 2 amp rate. I tried this 4 separate times with no luck. The voltage of the batteries would rise to 14 volts but the current was not even 1 amp when loaded, and then the voltage would drop to 8 or 9 volts under load immediately.
Then John advised that I attach 2 diodes to the output of the newest advanced device that I had built. That would give me 2 isolated branches to charge with. So, I did exactly that. He said to put a steady power supply on the input so as to produce steady input for an extended time, and simply walk away from the machine and the batteries.
The following evening, I stopped the Advanced Energizer Circuit. I removed the recovery batteries. Now, listen closely! The 2 garden batteries that were completely useless and would have otherwise been thrown away are now producing as much as 7 amps of current for several minutes at a time before being discharged to 11.4 volts.
Now, one secret to the Bedini process is the cycling of the batteries in the device. Each cycle, the batteries become less and less sulfated. I am compiling tests of each battery that I use in the device for increases in usefulness. Having proven the smaller devices last year, I am now proving the usefulness of the larger and more advanced Bedini circuitry.
It seems that John has been right all along, and nobody has been listening or following his directions. I have seen engineers argue the Ohms law, and all of that other taught discipline in electrical theory. When these people forget the conventional way of thinking and just do the experiments and quit listening to incompetent people who fail, then there will be more advanced devices that will provide useful power to, otherwise helpless people. You will NOT measure a 1 amp drain in the circuits with a 4 amp output!!! I REPEAT, the circuits do NOT indicate with conventional meters any gain!!! But the batteries become fully charged!!! When all of you forget meters to show this energy, you will see in the load tests that the energy has charged the batteries. It is provided as extra watts in the load tests. That's where you will see it. Perhaps some of you have been looking at this energy all along, but did not know what to look for. Or perhaps, some have been just following the words of a few unsuccessful people who could not walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. If I can do it, ANYONE CAN!!!
I have PROVEN 100%; and I have the analyzer load tests, that these batteries were useless. And now they are resurrected to a useful level. And that increases with each charge and discharge in the unit. Now, if the battery will supply one amp of current for a period of time, perhaps into the hours, then these batteries have been saved, at least enough to charge more batteries with the machine. The way I see it, $50 worth of wire and transistors, scrap PVC for a frame, and some Radio Shack magnets and a scrap bicycle wheel , has begun recovering $50 worth of batteries within 24 hrs.
I have posted some pics of the new, advanced device on www.nuscam.org . I have blocked out some areas of Bedini's proprietary circuitry, until such time that he wishes to release it, then I will replace with the untouched photos. But that is his decision, not mine. The general description of the circuits are in his patents. The schematic that was provided to Sterling Allen and others is a start. Learn the technology, and how it works, then perhaps the more advanced circuits will be available in the future.
-- Best regards, [HS]