Free Energy Blog:2014:September:8-14

Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:05 pm.

  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

Free Energy Blog posts from September 8-14, 2014


Image:Collage labeled 95x95.jpg
Latest: There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1] > There was an error working with the wiki: Code[2] - Latest include: Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13Free Energy Blog:2016:02:13Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:11Free Energy Blog:2016:02:08Free Energy Blog:2016:02:02Blog:Index (PESWiki Bullet updated February 13, 2015 23:15 GMT)

Blog Archive

Going Forward

Free Energy Blog:2014:September:15-22

9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover-Up Wide Open

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:14'

Template: 4607

This is the first video I've seen of a 9/11 firefighter who is on a mission to expose the 9/11 conspiracy.


Infowars reporter Lee Ann McAdoo talks to Rudy Dent, 32 year veteran of NYC fire department and the NYPD, about his incredible first hand experience of the lies surrounding WTC 7. (YouTube September 11, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 23:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Missionary Work = Sharing All Good Things

The relevance to free energy is that we should be "missionaries" of free energy, as a topic that is well within the range of goodness that needs to be promulgated.

Template: 787

-- SilverThunder 07:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

XPRIZE offers $20 Million for ‘Forbidden Energy’

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:14'

Relevance: Directory:Contests and Challenges / Directory:Prizes

Bud Dodgson pointed us to this story over at

I'm surprised I didn't hear about this sooner (or pay attention to the many emails, so many of which fall out of my overflowing inbox).

This is huge for us. Surely at least one of the many technologies we are tracking could qualify. Let the leading inventors know.


: XPRIZE is a nonprofit founded by futurist Peter Diamandis which offers prizes to incentivize innovation. Below is a video clip from this year’s XPRIZE “Visioneering Workshop” at which the conferencees voted that “Forbidden Energy” should be what the prize should be for this year.

: XPRIZE board member Barry Thompson explains that today there is an ‘inquisition of scientific mindsets’ that is holding back breakthroughs in science. He mentions that scientists consider that energy sources like cold fusion, zero-point energy are possible, but that in reality no one can investigate it in academia because of blacklisting and a code of silence surrounding these unpopular topics.

: This year XPRIZE is offering $20 million to the first team that can produce ‘substantive energy generation’ from an ‘entirely new method’ twice in two weeks.

In history, this is likely to be recognized as perhaps the most significant development in exotic free energy this year.


Each year, corporate leaders, philanthropists, heads of innovation and XPRIZE Trustees gather for a multi-day Visioneering meetup to brainstorm, debate, and prioritize which of the world's Grand Challenges might be solved through incentivized competition. (YouTube June 2, 2014)

Here's the page on their site announcing this winning suggestion:

I'm looking into how people submit entries for this contest, what the criteria are, when the deadlines are, etc.

-- SilverThunder 06:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

David Allan says his UFT experiments show existence of free energy field


Template: 859


: Regarding exotic free energy, at time stamp 36:43, he makes this very relevant statement to the work we are engaged in here. This was said in reference to Emeritus Professor, Chauncey Riddle, who wrote the foreword to the book.

:: "He, along with several others, has been very touched by the unified field theory section of our book, because it talks about the work that Sterling is doing because we show evidence, direct evidence that there is a field in the universe that one can tap into which will supply, basically, free energy. We've shown the existence of this field, some of its properties that it has quantum states and we have two or three papers on our website which describe in some detail about the seven experiments we've done to validate the existence of this field and some of its properties. 


(YouTube September 13, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 23:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Write Letter to Editor about SHT

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:12'

Template: 4606

Google News alerts brought this editorial in the Recorder in Greenfield Massachusetts to my attention. I was just going to post it on the SHT page, but then I thought I might as well encourage you to do the same with your local paper. You could use this one as a boiler plate. Spread the good news.

I should note that I've seen a number of "outside the box" articles from this news service, so John Ingress may have had an advantage there.

Letter: Hydrogen power - Today, the test results from an independent lab confirm that the energy output from one barrel of water is equal to that of three barrels of oil, using the LENR process developed by Solar Hydrogen Trends Inc. (Recorder September 11, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 23:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

A working hypothesis about the destruction of the WTC buildings on 9/11/2001

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:12'

Relevance: Directory:Conspiracy > Directory:9/11 Conspiracy

: From: Douglas Zork

: Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:08 PM

: Subject: A working hypothesis about the destruction of the WTC buildings on 9/11/2001

: Sterling,

: I wrote this a couple of years ago. It's along the same lines as your analysis.

: I'm looking forward to your interview with Nancy Lazaryan.

: Regards,

: Douglas Zork

- - - -

: From: Douglas Zork

: To: Kevin Barrett

: Sent: Tue, October 30, 2012 6:34:10 PM

: Kevin,

: I would like to contact Clare Kuehn about the article "Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle" by Don Fox, Clare Kuehn, and others, posted yesterday (Oct 29, 2012) on Veterans Today.

: Dr. Ronald Richter apparently coined the term "zero point energy" to describe the source of large amounts of unpredicted extra energy released by highly compressed electron gas (i.e. plasma) in thermonuclear fission and fusion reactions. In 1956 he was out of work in Argentina after President Juan Peron prematurely announced in 1952 that Dr. Richter's nuclear physics research project on Huemul Island, funded by the Peron government of Argentina, had successfully carried out shock-wave controlled exponential nuclear fusion reactions in the laboratory. A concerted international effort ensued to publicly discredit his nuclear research, apparently with his own cooperation, perhaps coerced by the Nazi International operating in Peron's Argentina after the war.

: In 1956 Dr. Richter, an experimental applied physicist who directed a variety of important research projects in Nazi Germany, was applying to work in the United States under Operation Paperclip. He described his work in Nazi Germany during WW II, and in Peron's Argentina from 1948 to 1954, in a series of US Air Intelligence Information Reports (declassified in 1999):



: Dr. Richter's reported methods of controlling exponential fusion reactions are similar to the promising "focus fusion" approach that is being developed today by nuclear physicists in Iran, and in the USA at Lawrenceville Plasma Physics (LPP).

: The Nazi Bell project involved counter-rotating plasma containers in which the rotating plasma was subjected to electrically-generated shock waves. Materials in the vicinity of the Nazi Bell experiment were reported to undergo a progressive molecular disintegration, as well as nuclear transmutation of elements. Prisoners were used to wash down the equipment and laboratory surfaces with large quantities of water after each experimental operation of the Bell.

: Hypothetically, nuclear weapons could be designed to use controlled fusion reactions to spin and shock plasma, and possibly create physical effects similar to those reported for the Nazi Bell. Exotic states of matter resulting in progressive molecular disintegration (Dr. Judy Wood's"dustification" and "cold fuming"), may be related to unusual high spin states of protons, neutrons and electrons that are generated by specially engineered nuclear reactions. Steel, concrete, ceramic, and other materials may be induced into the exotic high spin state by molecularly and nuclearly-specific resonance effects. The energy contained in the exotic high spin states is transmitted to ordinary matter by specific resonant coupling, and can result in molecular disintegration (dustification, fuming), nuclear transmutation, and exotic luminescence (cold fire).

: Some phenomena noted by Dr. Judy Wood do seem to be better explained by something like the Hutchison effect, hypothetically caused by a perpendicularly directed energy beam interfering with a powerful electric field in the target space. Cylindrical cutouts in WTC Buildings 6 and Building 5, and especially the holes into the basement levels next to Liberty St., and the hole in Vesey St. are hard to explain by "mini-neutron bombs".

: The directed explosive effect of "mini-neutron bombs" create a cone of destruction, not a cylinder. How did "mini-neutron bombs" cause the holes next to Liberty St., only a few feet from the slurry wall of the bathtub. How did "mini-neutron bombs" cause the hole in Vesey St.?

: The steady rain of hundreds of "jumpers" shocked firemen. Burning jetfuel doesn't account for such behavior, nor does the burning of office furnishings. Some bodies seem to have become dismembered before landing, the condition of some bodies showed alterations in body tissues that seemed inconsistent with burn injuries or the force of impact.

: The misnamed "pyroclastic" dust clouds that rolled out immediately after the buildings' destruction were not hot enough to justify being described as "pyroclastic": vegetation and sheets of paper, and skin of people enveloped by the dust cloud were not burned.

: There are many pictures of persistent "fuming" rising from the surface of debris that is not burning, and far removed from any gaps in the debris allowing smoke from hot underground fires to escape to the surface.

: "Mini-neutron bombs" do not explain the pattern of destruction of "toasted cars": missing door handles, the selectively "melted" engine blocks. These phenomena are hypothetically explained by Hutchison-like effets, by exotic high-spin state of matter, resonant coupling of high spin energy to specific elements, metal alloys, and molecular compounds. "Mini-neutron bombs" do not explain the disappearance of the decorative stone facing on the WFC building without adjacent window glass being broken.

: I think Clare Kuehn is on the right track to admit that advanced small nuclear explosives may have been used as part of the technology of destruction of the WTC. Dr. Judy Wood has not made a serious case for ruling them out.

: Jeff Prager's and Don Fox's bombastic loose talk accusing Dr. Judy Wood of being a disinformation agent would be downright silly, were it not arguably libelous. Ditto for Dr. Judy Wood's loose talk accusing her detractors of being disinformation agents.

: Dr. Judy Wood goes wrong when she rules out the use of any types of explosive or incendiary devices in the technology of destruction of the WTC.

: Don Fox and Jeff Prager go wrong when they make the ad hominem argument that because they have alleged she is a disinformation agent, they don't have to deal with her evidence, and with her primary hypothesis that some kind of DEW was used to generate Hutchison-like effects, including exotic states of matter that resulted in dustification without heating steel and other materials to their vaporization temperatures.

: It is interesting to note that nuclear fusion/fission devices could hypothetically be engineered to induce an exotic high-spin state of matter that resulted in progressive molecular disintegration over a period of seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, and months. But clearly many phenomena are better explained by some kind of DEW, than by "mini-neutron bombs" alone, or in combination with conventional explosives, or even nano-engineered thermite or thermate.

: Sincerely,

: Douglas Zork

-- SilverThunder 14:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Undeniable Footage of Jet Aircraft Spraying

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:12'

Relevance: Directory:Conspiracy > Directory:Geoengineering > Directory:Chemtrails

2q-BZxl-Zxk The extremely compelling footage in this 3 minute video should be yet another powerful tool to be used in the battle to awaken the sleeping masses to what is occurring over their heads day in and day out. The sprayed disbursements that are clearly occurring behind this jet tanker can not be rationally denied. All of us must help with the challenge of bringing awareness to this dire issue. My most sincere thanks to Tom Anderson and Anubis 420 for catching this very valuable film footage. Dane Wigington (YouTube September 10, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 12:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

TWIFE™ 9/11/14 -- Featuring Nancy Lazaryan on Subatomic Hutchison Effect


Template: 1607


(YouTube September 11, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 11:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Advertise with PES Network, Inc.


Template: 225

-- SilverThunder 21:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Brillouin ~100x OU
Image:Mike-McKubre Fran-Tanzella SRI 300.jpg

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:10'

Relevance: Directory:Cold Fusion > Directory:Brillouin Energy Corporation (BEC)

Posted with permission of Brillouin:

: From: Dan Kuang

: To: sterlingda

: Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:32 AM

: Subject: Question about the actual power gain in Brillouin Hydrogen Hot Tube boiler

: Hello,

: I have read that the COP of the Brillouin HHT (hydrogen hot tube) boiler is expected to be 100, where the input power is 300 W and the output is 30 kW of thermal power. Do you know the actual power gain in the HHT system?

: Dan

- - - -

: From: reg [of]

: To: Sterling Allan

: Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 9:29 PM

: Subject: Re: Fw: Question about the actual power gain in Brillouin Hydrogen Hot Tube boiler

: Not sure if the system will be stable at a gain of 100 yet. We are still solving other problems in that product / process design.

- - - -

: From: Sterling Allan

: To: reg

: Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2014 9:12 PM

: Subject: Re: Fw: Question about the actual power gain in Brillouin Hydrogen Hot Tube boiler

: Okay if I post this brief dialogue. We've not heard any Brillouin news for quite a few months.

: Anything else you can tell us?

: Sterling

- - - -

: From: Robert Godes

: To: Sterling Allan

: Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:05 PM

: Subject: Re: Fw: Question about the actual power gain in Brillouin Hydrogen Hot Tube boiler

: Sorry. It took so long to respond. Lots going on and we just got to discussing this. The answer is YES

: Best regards,

: Robert E. Godes

: President and Chief Technology Officer

: Brillouin Energy Corp.

Postscript. Inasmuch as the post prior to this pertains to 9/11, I should mention a conversation I had with Mike McKubre as we were walking back to the SRI International lobby after the tour of the Brillouin test set-up a few months ago. He remarked that because NIST prostituted themselves in covering up for the government in their report explaining how building 7 could come down by office fires alone that they have taken a huge hit in credibility among the scientific community. They are no longer viewed as the pillar of metrology that they were set up to be and for decades were revered to be. Scientists are looking elsewhere.

Meanwhile, NIST (in Boulder, according to my Dad, who still lectures there at an annual meeting) got a major facelift with a huge influx of funds (aka payoff). It's all a facade.

-- SilverThunder 04:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Looking for 9/11 guest: both

[[Image:Ambulance_survived_wtc1_sq.jpg|right|frame|Look at this ambulance on the sidewalk, after two 110-story buildings have been destroyed. It's higher than the rubble around it. There is no way that the domolition-only model could be true, even if it drove in after the collapse of the first building. How could it drive in after a 110 story building collapsed 30 feet away? That rubble had to have been from the building it's parked next to and it should be several stories deep, if demolition was the only method for bringing the building down. ]

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:10'

Relevance: Directory:Conspiracy > Directory:9/11 Conspiracy

For my radio show on September 11, I've been looking for a guest who is knowledgeable about both the demolition and the dustification models. Unfortunately, these two camps usually are at odds with one another, calling each other names -- disinformation agents, etc. Who would be a good spokesman to address both of these well?

In particular, I would like to find someone who has a good rebuttal to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth FAQ #3: What’s Your Assessment of the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis?.

A couple of weeks ago, I tried to see if my friend, Directory:Physics Professor, Steven E. Jones, would do the 9/11 interview with me on this subject, but he backed out, citing the above AE911Truth article as what he prefers to cite in response to questions about the "dustification" line of thought put forth by Dr. Judy Woods, who pegs Steve as a disinfo agent [wrongfully, and unfortunately, I think]. For example, the footage she shows of him taking a vote about not calling LENR "cold fusion" was actually a sentiment adopted by Martin Fleishmann himself near the end of his life, preferring "LENR", saying it probably isn't "fusion" after all, but some other anomalous heat (still significant) phenomenon.

Then, I tried to get Jeremy Rys to come on the show with me to talk about this, but he also backed out, not seeing the hard evidence for the dustification model compared to the demolition model [not willing to consider the possibility that both might be in play], also emotionally upset because of death threats he received when he came out against Dr. Judy Wood's model.

I was threatened with a lawsuit by Dr. Judy Woods, herself, when I posted my arguments in favor of her model, because she wants to be the sole spokesperson of her model.

Crazy political stuff that has nothing to do with science. Own worst enemy stuff.

In my view, the evidence points solidly to both phenomenon having been in play: demolition and dustification. Nether model alone satisfies all the data.

The demolition (not dustification) camp ignores things like:

It wasn't just buildings 1, 2 and 7 that went down that day. Building 3 was completely down to the ground level most of Building 4 was gone down to the ground at least half of 6 -- in an oval shape through the middle of it was gone, down to the ground.

The ambulance seen in front of WTC 1 or 2 on the sidewalk, covered in dust, not smashed, not buried in rubble from two 110 story buildings that just "fell" in its vicinity, with sidewalk visible (covered in dust).

You can see the chunks of material going to dust as they fall.

Misshapen beams that resemble the Hutchison effect.

The category 3 hurricane Irene offshore that the news all but ignored.

The correlating Magnetometer readings.

The toasted metal effect.

The dustification (not demolition) camp ignores things like:

The squibs you can see ejecting from the building in advance of its fall.

The many explosions that were heard by hundreds of witnesses.

The sliced beams that match cutter charge work.

It seems to me that it was both, not one or the other. And we should stop squabbling and join together to more effectively expose this crime of the millennium.


(Sept. 10, 3:30 pm MDT)

I talked to Nancy Lazaryan, John Hutchison's wife, and she agreed to come on my show tomorrow with me to talk about this. She said John has shied away from talking about 9/11 because he doesn't like how awake people tend to want to blame him for what happened.

Be sure to tune in. Nancy brings a fresh perspective to this that explains how the buildings turned to dust. Has to do with resonance on the subatomic level. And the black ops have been playing with this stuff much longer than John has. See, for example, Preston Nickols -- predated John.

Template: 1607

-- SilverThunder

Giant Russian Tesla Tower operational again

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1]

'Free Energy Blog:2014:09:09'

Relevance: News:Nikola Tesla > Directory:Giant Russian Tesla Tower Array

My question regarding this announcement is what "operational" means. What was the full purpose of this huge array? Is it achieving that full output? Is it just for show/entertainment, or does it have a practical purpose? [answer below]

EastGhost brought this to our attention:

: Giant Russian Tesla Tower fully operational again — Cold War v2.0 - (dutchsinse September 8, 2014)


: The Russians built a giant “Tesla Tower” during the cold war. They now have reactivated the program, renovated the equipment, and fired up the facility for operational use.

: The towers stand 57meters high (187 feet). The public tests show almost 200 foot long lightning bolts generated.

Image:Teslacoil-7 350.jpg
Image:Teslacoil-11 350.jpg

- - - -


According to this report by RT, the array could power two cities the size of Moscow, but that is not its purpose. It was built to test the effect of lighting on various apparatus, such as planes, to make sure they are ready to meet lightning in the real world.


Thunder and lightning: For centuries mankind's been amazed as well as terrified at the threatening beauty of nature's fury. But these days it's actually been domesticated, and now we can even throw a thunderbolt at the push of a button, as Ilya Petrenko reports. (YouTube / RT August 24, 2014)

Thanks to Yvonne Hanna for giving us that link.

-- SilverThunder 12:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

MES50 QMoGen appears to be for sale in Russia


Template: 1154


(YouTube / PESNetwork September 5, 2014)

-- SilverThunder 15:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


Free Energy Blog:2014:September:1-7