Lasted edited by Andrew Munsey, updated on June 14, 2016 at 9:25 pm.

  • One error has been found on this page. Administrator will correct this soon.
  • This page has been imported from the old peswiki website. This message will be removed once updated.

METOZ overbalance concept by which device is said to be able to tap the energy of gravity, is elaborate but flawed, according to PES Science Advisor, Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen. Inventor, Zygmunt Or?owski, responds saying he has broken the law of conservation of energy.


Official Website

Other Coverage Mathematical description

Recent Correspondence

From: "Zygmunt Or?owski"

Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:31 PM

Subject: Re: TIFE index page at


Dzi?kuj? za poczt? elektroniczn?.

Metoz you had seen is very old. I have got METOZ in other variant. More comprehensible.

This enclosure is clean. In my elaboration METOZ about, no one is able to find even small

mistake. [not true, see below]

I do want to sell the Metoz invention.E veryone is able to build just the model of METOZ

machine and test it.

It is not a long shot. It is very easy. Not complicated. I can help with the aid of E-mail

correspondence. METOZ will be able to produce real clean energy!!! Have a good look at

supplement at [bottom] part of web.

Zygmunt Or?owski

: Attachment (received from Zygmunt Aug. 23, 2005)


Doesn't respond to critical analysis

From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"

Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:09 AM

Subject: Re: Metoz?

Hi Sterling,

Being in this field can be weary at times. While we

put tremendous effort into unlocking Nature's secrets,

lots of other people bog us down with worthless crap.

This is one of those bog-downs. I analyzed METOZ

months ago and the character is baraging us again, and

nothing was addressed from my analysis before. Tell

him to read my analysis and go away.

He has a flaw in his analysis and I pointed it out to

him. It shows up as the mass of the balance beam is

increased, simulated by identical weights on each pan

of the beam balance. At best, this Pole does not

understand English.


Elaborate but not viable

From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"

Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:19 AM

Subject: Fwd: Re: science advisor

Dear Sterling,

I sent this in case you were sent it also from Zygund

and were curious of its viability. His work is one of

the most elaborate I have seen. Unfortunately, I am

sure he is at a dead end, despite his work. His

website is for a full

viewing of his work if you did not receive his initial

email and are curious.


Why it won't work

From: "Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen"

To: "Zygmunt Or³owski"

Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:14 AM

Subject: Re: science advisor

Dear Zygmunt,

The Metozor idea is clever! Good observation skills!

I agree with your basic analysis but not with what it

can do. When the water valve opens to reduce the

water pressure, energy is lost. Pressure relief

dissipates energy, (V)(dP). Also, pressure

application requires energy input to the water, also

(V)(dP). There appears to be no net energy gain in

the cycle. The energy to tip the balance beam came

from the pressure source that did work on the beam and

water pistons. The same energy was dissipated, as

(V)(dP) is the same, just of opposite sign.

The anomaly is due to the same weights (100 kg in your

example) added to each side of the balance beam. This

is the same thing as making a more massive beam, and

of course the beam will deflect less, due to the

center of mass of the beam at point P. See how a more

massive beam in example C/3 would make a smaller


Congress:Advisor:Kenneth M. Rauen

PES Science Advisor

Response to Critique

From: "Zygmunt Orlowski"

To: "Sterling D. Allan"

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 1:47 PM

Subject: Re: Metoz criticism

Thanks for your message.

The principal problem be colled : " Pascal's law ". Lot of people don't understand how is created

cycle : straightening.

In Poland nobody beliews that model of METOZ was able to realize the cycle "straightening".

After build that model i had sent a lot of letters to higher schools in Poland. No

one was interested to see model. In your country is identicaly situation. At least i had




It is all. The " three levers" is for persons , which don't know how looks even arm

lever in "paradox", in model and in balance showed on photo of model.

The supplement is most important. There is the Pascal's law and few pictures of METOZ.

No one in all the world can say that there is mistake. Long time now I had broken " the law

of conservation of energy". Differently : "Energy cannot be made or destroyed, but it can change

from one form to another. Something more: " The total amount of energy is unchanged." METOZ can

take an energy from gravitation or is a "duplicator of energy". At present we can build real " perpetual motion machine"

Zygmunt Orlowski

Q. Does it Work?


Can you produce video tape footage of a prototype running? Can you show data from prototype? Do you have witnesses who are willing to attest?

-- Sterling A. Allan 21:42, 29 Aug 2005 (EDT)

A. Prototype was Destroyed

From: "Zygmunt Orlowski"

To: "Sterling D. Allan"

Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 5:18 AM

Subject: Re: Metoz criticism

Model of METOZ was destroyed about 2003. Only 3 person had seen METOZ's test. Nobody more.

Zygmunt Orlowski

Not Answering the Questions

From: "Ken Rauen"

To: "Sterling Allan"

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:10 PM

Subject: Fwd: Re: Metoz criticism

[Zygmunt] is flat-out ignoring my analysis. I put

about two hours into the meticulous understanding and

analysis of his system and he is still trumpeting no

one finds any flaws.



Zygmunt Or?owski

Gdynia, Polska

Zygmunt Or?owski

phone: 048-58-711-84-15

(48 58) ... 624-68-36 ul.

Niska 1 b / 33 81-646 Gdynia


See Talk:Directory:Metoz

See also

Metoz - page at

- Directory

- Main Page

There was an error working with the wiki: Code[1]